User talk:Ceyockey

Archives

• User talk:Ceyockey/archive1 ~ before April 2006
• User talk:Ceyockey/archive2 ~ June 2006 to April/May 2007

hi

Howdy, can't let this fresh talk page be blank for too long! Diletante has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Diletante 01:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Cookie! Oztion

Have a few cookies on me. You helped me rescue Oztion from deletion quite a while back by watching that article's history and reverting an IP user's reference deletions. I just went back to that article today to see how it was going, and did a bit of pruning myself, and I realized how much I appreciated your help back then as a newbie. Thanks! SMC 07:26, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Moldovan Song

Surely notable if and only if the other Eurovision 2007 entries are? 131.111.250.142 07:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Stub

Nice work ([1]). --Dweller 10:46, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Diamond Management

Hi, you had put a notability tag on Diamond Management & Technology Partners. I have updated the discussion page to show that the company is notable. Once you get a chance to look at it, could you please remove the tag. Also, I am not sure if you can do this, but would it be possible to move this article to "Diamond Management & Technology Consultants"? I got the name wrong when I first put it together. Thanks! PadreNuestro 23:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Fight (song)

I've removed the merger and notability tags from this article, as it placed in the top 10 (not 24th, as you've suggested to the anon who queried it) in the largest competitive music festival in the world. Precedent, furthermore, has been that any song performed onstage at ESC is eminently notable, due to the fact that it represented a country in an international competition. You're welcome to discuss this further on my Talk page if you want. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Belated agreement

re: Your ole post in Template_talk:R_to_section

My gut feeling is that there is little substantive difference between Template:R from subtopic and Template:R to section. What is unfortunate is the merger of concepts underlying Template:R from subtopic and Template:R with possibilities as it is a truism that almost all tolerated titles and named concepts have the possibility of becoming an article though there might be a very small probability of this taking place. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

• I'd never heard of Template:R from subtopic(edit talk links history) before this, but I agree. There's maybe a gnats eyelash of difference between the two. In general, I've been tagging the section linked to with {{Redirectstohere}} as well, so there's an back notation (no link) suggesting changing the title is a bad idea! You might think about working the aliased name into the redirects documentation page. Cheers! // FrankB 03:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

The Case of the Constant Suicides

1930s book never had ISBNs this is either a modern edition or a retrospecitively added (and not historically significant) addition. but thanks anyway! :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 12:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Vandal Wermania

Hi, Ceyockey.
That tagging was done by user that purposely registered himself to vandalize articles related to Croatian victims of war crimes done by Serbs.
I've reported that user to admins.
Case of tagging is solved; these articles are backed up with ICTY materials (that that vandal, user Wermania, has ignored). Kubura 09:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

User:Hxseeker

I'm restoring the sockpuppet notice for Hxseeker. Next time I'd appreciate some sort of comment somewhere before or at least after such a notice is removed. Thanks. --Ronz 16:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

He's been blocked. I was just surprised that his user page, where I had placed the sockpuppet warning, was deleted with no indication why nor any other indication (on his talk page for instance) that Hxseeker was being investigated for sockpuppetry. Sorry that I came across a bit abrupt and harsh. --Ronz 18:21, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy v. Prod

For astute understanding of when to use prod and when to use speedy:

Ginkgo100^talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! 02:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Re:Thank you for your assistance on my talk page

No problemo. :D Angel Of Sadness ^T/C 21:59, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Mangaria

I don't understand your change from speedy to PROD. Being a hoax is certainly not a criterion for speedy deletion, but I didn't nominate for speedy deletion because it's a hoax, I nominated it for speedy deletion because it's non-notable. If the hoax non-criterion trumps the specific CSD criteria, wouldn't it be true that any article that meets the other criteria could exempt itself from the reach of speedy deletion merely by adding a fake source? PubliusFL 18:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, the criterion I nominated under was A7. But I guess the claim about the Lonely Planet guide, although false, could plausibly be construed as an assertion of notability. PubliusFL 18:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

RE:Hills Have Eyes

I don't oppose the deletion. Do what you must. :) --Victor (talk) 05:59, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

RE: AFD note

Thanks for your advice on the AFD process. It's really hard to find such processes sometimes. --Lendorien 13:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD Closure

I strongly disagree with the closure of this AfD. While I am, obviously, not exactly an impartial observer, it seems to me that there is clear consensus against this article. Most participants made the perfectly cogent, policy-based argument that the article is just a trivial list, which is not appropriate for Wikipedia (WP:FIVE). --Eyrian 17:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Morse code in popular culture. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Eyrian 17:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Removal of speedy delete tag for Inga Liljeström

Hi, I am not sure why you removed the SD tag on article Inga Liljeström and converted it into a redirect to Inga Liljestrom; as you can see from the lead of the latter article, Inga Liljeström is the correct name (see also the singer's website and the album covers) — as such, the redirect should go the other way round, which is exactly why I tagged the article {{db-move}} in the first place. What did I miss ? Schutz 07:48, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Information virus

No worries. It's almost in the procees.Go ahead :).Thank you--NAHID 17:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Xhet

May I ask why you suggested that Xhet be copied to Wicktionary? The word is clearly fake, not only does Google come up with nothing (nothing english at any rate), but according to the article, the word was created this very day. -WarthogDemon 01:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Diamond DA40 Star

After more consideration, this redirect is fine. At first this seemed like just a mix up of all the words, but then I relized it is a commonly used term, although not correct. But a redirect to the correct title would be fine. If you want to remove the complete AfD on the article, that's fine with me. Sorry for the confusion. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 03:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Amzeglouf

Are you calling me a liar? The Internet has almost no coverage of rural towns and villages in Africa ask anybody so its not surprising google doesn't pick it up. Africa is so poor in parts that putting their village on a website is the last thing on their minds. I've just checked the Phillips World Atlas again and it lies approximately 40 km north of Zaouiet Reggane in central Algeria. Swearing the honest truth. but if there is no info as yet best to mention it in the Zaouiet Reggane as being nearby rather than a seperate article ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you?" Contribs} 12:50, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Its amazing how the Internet cannot pick up tone of voice!!!. Spouting bile? Hey aside from the first few words this was friendly. Why should I be worked up about a one line stub? I am agreeing with you about it - its just the "no evidence there is such a place" (whilst partly true on the Internet) makes me look like a prankster. I'd suggest a redirect to Zaouiet Reggane. All the best ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you?" Contribs} 13:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me anyway. Its a shame that there is very little information on Africa. I have added prod templates many times to entire province articles which covers thousands of sq kilometres in Africa yet only have a two line stub. Then you get a tiny shopping mall in America with a full length article!!! Even for the African capital cities there is not really much online information to go on. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you?" Contribs} 13:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Hmm. The only thing is whilst the detailed map shows up many of these settlements there is quite truthfully zilch info to go on. Should wikipedia be a reference point to say where something is or should it provide information about that place? In my view it should do both and provide at least some basic facts. This is where the fundamental problem lies that wikipedia despite its global reach will inevitably be biased because of the uneven distribution of information. If you see anymore geo stubs with no google hits -I'd strongly suggest a merging into List of towns and villages in ... Province or Algeria etc... ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you?" Contribs} 13:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Again I guess its what wikipedia means to people. There are those who think it should collect any given topic under the sun and those who believe much of it should be filtered out like a formal traditional encyclopedia. I created those stubs over a year ago I think - i haven't done much work on municipalities for a very long time. My work on wikipedia is now chiefly involved with Films and actors, Tibet and Cambodia with the odd artist/writer article rather than geo stubbing. Ah never mind -you can't say I didn't try. In reality many of these villages in the desert are not exactly of global significance anyway are they!!! but I was trying to cover land more evenly. Regards and keep up the good wikiing. I appreciate your're efforts ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you?" Contribs} 13:24, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: PROD cycling club

No problem with deletion for that article. I had no memory of seeing it before until looking at the article history :-) Nyttend 22:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Image talk commons

Sorry for this error, I asked people in IRC to adding CAT to this template, but noone answer me, So I add these CATs then asked them to see it, but no one answer me :), Sorry for this.--OsamaK 18:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

CSD R1

This discussion seems stalled, or maybe it is dying a natural death. As you contributed to it, I wonder if you would have any more to add? Carcharoth 08:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)