User talk:Moonriddengirl: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:51, 11 October 2007

Welcome. To leave a message for me, please press the plus sign at the top of the page. Remember to sign your message with ~~~~. I will respond to all civil comments at your talk page, unless you specify that you would rather I respond here.

If you have an issue with a vandalism revert I have made, please let me know. I try to ensure that I do not revert good faith edits, but accidents do happen. Leave me a message, and I will review my action and reverse it if my assumption was false. We all make mistakes, and we are both trying to work in the best interests of the project.

Archives

/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by .

Re:Deletion

Why did you delete my page on atadrad.com? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pen lord2000 (talk • contribs) 22:02, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Faerghail

An article that you previously prodded and had notability questions about, Faerghail, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faerghail. Thank you. Springnuts 14:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Permanently?

What do you mean by that? Squash Racket 15:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I've just read it. Sorry, didn't know about that. Squash Racket 15:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for telling me. I should have read the beginning of the talk page:-) Tankred 15:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability concerns and speedy deletions

Thanks for this heads up, for some reason this detail had escaped me. Will take it on board. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 14:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Vs Speedy Deletion

I had no idea what it meant. Thanks for your help :) Karthik 06:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to comment, but please don't remove 3PO requests

Other people might want to share an opinion. Thank you. --NBCfootballju 19:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK I'll move it. --NBCfootballju 19:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Chickie-girl

You got a sec? ^Ariel♥Gold 13:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do. What's up? --Moonriddengirl 13:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, take a look at this thread please? Both issues? The editor is replacing "sexual intercourse" with "fuck". Now, while neither Mike, nor I, are particularly offended easily, it seems completely un-necessary to do on this page, and then there's the issue of the editor's name, which is an exact match to a hugely well-known corporation. Well, you'll see when you read the thread, hee hee. ^Ariel♥Gold 13:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All right. I'm heading over to check it out. --Moonriddengirl 13:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that it's a clear and blatant case of username policy violation since it's not being used promotionally, but I suspect that its usage is improper since the editor's behavior could cause the company embarrassment. I haven't done much with username violations. However, I've brought the issue up at User talk:Rlevse with an admin who is active at WP:UAA, asking for advice and/or an assist. --Moonriddengirl 13:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You rock, girlie! Seriously. Thanks for stepping in on this. I really would have thought it would be a UAA issue, but either way, if it goes to RFCN I have little doubt it would be disallowed. Of course, I've been proved wrong before, so hey, lol. ^Ariel♥Gold 14:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dropped the tag on his page for you, hope that's okay. Rlevse 14:18, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He responded and was not receptive. Listed it at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names.Rlevse 22:48, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roots (Everly Brothers album)

Hi. :) I just wanted to point out to you that the above article actually did have a reference when you placed your "unreferenced" tag on it here. The reference is in the infobox and can be traced by following the "link". When I first started working on albums, I was confused by this as well, but this is the standard placement as developed by consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums. I also wanted to note that the article had the "inuse" tag at the top of it at the time you edited. Of course, it is only a request that other editors not edit the article while the tag is in place, in order to avoid edit conflicts, and you were well within your rights to ignore the request, but it is a nice gesture to hold off while the article is under active construction to see how it develops. You may already be well familiar with that template, but since you're on new page patrol I thought I would point it out to you in case you were not. :) --Moonriddengirl 22:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, before I say anything else I would like to apologize for the confusion (and sorry about how long it took to get back!). I have generally always hesitated when tagging album articles with unreferenced tags, because I realized there must be some reason hardly any of them cite no external links or references at the bottom of the page. However, I am very familiar with the in use/under constuction tags because I am in the NP Patrol and use it myself when creating articles sometimes. The reason I tagged it was because I saw it was in use, and realized that you must still be working on it, and if you saw the tag, you would add references. (That's where I made the mistake.) I never paid enough attention to the music infoboxes to notice that one link would be the references. Thanks for the notice…and I now have my confusions clarified. jj137 (Talk) 22:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. :) As I said, when I first started working on albums, I was also confused by the apparent lack of sourcing. I still sort of think they should be on the bottom myself, but that's consensus for you. --Moonriddengirl 00:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, thanks for the help. jj137 (Talk) 02:23, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for doing what you to my article. It really helped out.

I also saw you were looking for users to adopt. How does that work?

Thanks! Gdk41 1 01:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a cool tool to help format reference links: [1]. Dreadstar † 04:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may already know this stuff, but I added a references section and formatted a link in Rome High School. Check it out! Dreadstar † 04:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Gdk41 1 21:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd thought I'd let you know that I nominated Rome High School for deletion here since you helped in the article. Thanks! Phgao 16:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Annie in Wonderland

Thanks for tweaking this, it was one of my first efforts. I would have looked up the AllMusic reference but that site keeps crashing my browser! --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 18:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing continued vandalism by moongirl

Moongirl you are nothing but a pathetic fool. You serve no purpose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moongirl enemy (talk • contribs) 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Sultan Catto

There is no Copyright violation as you suggest on the talk page there. --Ludvikus 13:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will demonstrate at the article's talk page. --Moonriddengirl 13:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following single descriptive sentence, and brief list, does not constitute a Copyright violation:

   Catto has made important contributions to the development of elementary particle physics
   particularly in the area of dynamical supersymmetry,
   and in mathematics in the subject areas of spectral theory of automorphic forms
   and "octonionic projective geometries"
   (see Octonions and Projective Geometry) with applications to quantum mechanics.Yours truly, --Ludvikus 13:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changed sentence. Hope you're satisfied. --Ludvikus 21:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three Valley Museum

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Three Valley Museum. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Dsmdgold 13:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads up. :) I'll pop over. --Moonriddengirl 13:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rome HS

Since you were involved, thought you might want to comment on this. Dreadstar † 16:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment..<blushes>... Dreadstar † 23:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize that I only got involved because of you...I saw it on your talk page, that thing you do...or did here. Dreadstar † 02:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits on Texas A&M's Corps of Cadets page

I responded to your comments. If you have feedback/additional ideas, I'd love to hear them! — BQZip01 — ^talk 21:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Responded here. --Moonriddengirl 15:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boiling tube productions

I am anmnoyed about the fact that BTP was deleted and am asking why. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Damnsmalldan (talk • contribs) 13:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded here. --Moonriddengirl 15:03, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 121: / Line 121: @@
 I am anmnoyed about the fact that BTP was deleted and am asking why.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Damnsmalldan|Damnsmalldan]] ([[User talk:Damnsmalldan|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Damnsmalldan|contribs]]) 13:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :I have responded [[User_talk:Damnsmalldan#Regarding your note|here]]. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] 15:03, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
-so.....conclusion on NYCmetroProject:  all i have to do is produce an article of non-trivial descent, and have someone else post the article to maintain neutrality???
-if such articles do not exist on the project as of yet.....as "substitutes".....is there any way i can use the multitude of consent forms signed by subway riders participating in the project already, and articles summarizing other experiential websites ("genre-ing" the same subject matter - NYC Subways)???
-i read credible sources include the following:
-. idea or project (New York City Subway photo-documentary)
-. project creator info (QuagInc)
-. a site to substantiate the idea exists (www.nycmetroproject.com)
-please advise.