Jump to content

Talk:Eight-Nation Alliance: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
TheAsianGURU (talk | contribs)
m edit WPCHINA Tag
Line 29: Line 29:
==Comparison with G8==
==Comparison with G8==
Compare the constituents with [[G8]]. – [[User:Kaihsu|Kaihsu]] 18:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Compare the constituents with [[G8]]. – [[User:Kaihsu|Kaihsu]] 18:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
:'''Eight-Nation Alliance''': [[Austria-Hungary]], [[France]], [[Germany]], [[Italy]], [[Japan]], [[Russia]], the [[United Kingdom]], and the [[United States]]
:'''Group of Eight (G8)''': [[Canada]], [[France]], [[Germany]], [[Italy]], [[Japan]], [[Russia]], the [[United Kingdom]] and the [[United States]]
:--[[Special:Contributions/207.112.4.206|207.112.4.206]] ([[User talk:207.112.4.206|talk]]) 19:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


=='''Article Needs to be Rewritten'''== This article needs to be rewritten. Some of it is almost incoherent. [[User:Stevenmitchell|Stevenmitchell]] 16:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
==Article Needs to be Rewritten==
This article needs to be rewritten. Some of it is almost incoherent. [[User:Stevenmitchell|Stevenmitchell]] 16:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


==British and Americans didn't loot?==
==British and Americans didn't loot?==

Revision as of 19:42, 16 February 2008

WikiProject iconChina Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

}}

WikiProject iconMilitary history: Asian / British / Chinese / European / French / United States Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
British military history task force
Taskforce icon
Chinese military history task force
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
French military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force

Sign your posts!!!!

You guys need to sign your posts. TheAsianGURU (talk) 17:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison with G8

Compare the constituents with G8. – Kaihsu 18:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eight-Nation Alliance: Austria-Hungary, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States
Group of Eight (G8): Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States
--207.112.4.206 (talk) 19:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article Needs to be Rewritten

This article needs to be rewritten. Some of it is almost incoherent. Stevenmitchell 16:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

British and Americans didn't loot?

I don't see any sources for this information, could anyone provide any? I've heard of Chinese artifacts in British museums, if they didn't loot, how did the artifacts get there?

==Ridiculously speculative logic, unless you can provide a list of chinese artifacts in British museums that you can prove were looted during this specific incident by the army units in question.

You're right the initial claim is a bit dubious, though I can't see why the Russo-war research society would have any particular axe to grind . I suspect it means the British and American forces weren't given leave to engage in looting by their officers, rather than none occuring at all.

Siege of Peking

Why do you suppress information about the taking of Peking by foreign forces? China will not collapse just because this detail is present in Wikipedia. Take it easy. --Ghirla-трёп- 00:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Eiorgiomugini"