Jump to content

Talk:Joshua Bloch: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Matt Crypto (talk | contribs)
Kylar (talk | contribs)
my 0.02 on notability and expansion ideas.
Line 16: Line 16:
==It reads like a self-promoted PR release==
==It reads like a self-promoted PR release==
I do not know if Joshua Bloch is notable or not. But the tone of this article really does not fit into the spirit of Wikipedia. I cannot say why, but I just feel it. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/198.62.10.11|198.62.10.11]] ([[User talk:198.62.10.11|talk]]) 21:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I do not know if Joshua Bloch is notable or not. But the tone of this article really does not fit into the spirit of Wikipedia. I cannot say why, but I just feel it. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/198.62.10.11|198.62.10.11]] ([[User talk:198.62.10.11|talk]]) 21:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Needs improvement, but definately notable==
I think that he's notable enough, but that the article doesn't express why. I think that if other notable tech people, like [[Bjarne_Stroustrup]] or [[Tim_Berners-Lee]] are notable enough to have wikipedia articles, then Bloch certainly is. I do also agree that this article needs cleanup, and more information about his notable works, such as *why* he's notable, what works he did @Sun and Google would go a long way towards this goal.
[[User:Kylar|Kylar]] ([[User talk:Kylar|talk]]) 20:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:59, 19 March 2008

WikiProject iconBiography Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Needs complete rewrite

This is actually a pretty well-written biography, but it's not that great a Wikipedia article, for two reasons; 1) it cites few sources, and is for the most part not written from published sources, stating "Much of the personal background in this article is derived from discussions with the subject and his family and friends". On Wikipedia, original research is verboten; articles must be derived from reliable published sources. 2) The tone of the text is just plain wrong for a encyclopedia article.

I suggest we just prune the thing right down to the bare, sourced facts (stub length, most likely), and build it up again from there. — Matt Crypto

Not a notable person

Joshua Bloch is not a notable person and Wikipedia is not a CV warehouse. This article should be promptly deleted. Graham Wellington 01:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it depends what you mean by notable...Bloch is fairly well known in the Java world, as these things go. — Matt Crypto 06:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
He is not a notable person by Wikipedia standards. Self-promotion articles of this kind are routinely deleted. Graham Wellington 00:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As orignal author I suggest to revert to my version, add pieces of information bit by bit, and strictly warn adders of unsoursed, biased and non-encyclopedical information --Ilya K 09:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted it to that version. Personally, I think he's notable enough by Wikipedia standards. — Matt Crypto 09:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It reads like a self-promoted PR release

I do not know if Joshua Bloch is notable or not. But the tone of this article really does not fit into the spirit of Wikipedia. I cannot say why, but I just feel it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.62.10.11 (talk) 21:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs improvement, but definately notable

I think that he's notable enough, but that the article doesn't express why. I think that if other notable tech people, like Bjarne_Stroustrup or Tim_Berners-Lee are notable enough to have wikipedia articles, then Bloch certainly is. I do also agree that this article needs cleanup, and more information about his notable works, such as *why* he's notable, what works he did @Sun and Google would go a long way towards this goal. Kylar (talk) 20:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]