User talk:とある白い猫: Difference between revisions
Dorftrottel (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 170: | Line 170: | ||
:::? What do you mean? [[User:Dorftrottel#DT|'''D'''or'''<!-- -->ft'''ro'''tt'''el]] ([[User talk:Dorftrottel|complain]]) 12:06, [[April 2]], 200<!--DT-->8 |
:::? What do you mean? [[User:Dorftrottel#DT|'''D'''or'''<!-- -->ft'''ro'''tt'''el]] ([[User talk:Dorftrottel|complain]]) 12:06, [[April 2]], 200<!--DT-->8 |
||
::::What does "Doesn't however change my attitude towards no-holds-barred fiction inclusionists" intended to mean? --<small> [[User:White Cat/08|Cat]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:White Cat/08|chi?]]</sup> 13:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
::::What does "Doesn't however change my attitude towards no-holds-barred fiction inclusionists" intended to mean? --<small> [[User:White Cat/08|Cat]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:White Cat/08|chi?]]</sup> 13:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
:::::It means that I think e.g. that by far most episode articles are not articles in any encyclopedic way and for a complete and utter lack of available acceptable sources never can be and should therefore be wiped from mainspace. In other words, that content-wise I still agree with Merridew and believe that he did less harm to Wikipedia than the ridiculous clowns and trolls who advocate shit like allowing '''"'''articles'''"''' e.g. on fictional characters based solely on primary sources. But the sockpuppeting was clearly bad. [[User:Dorftrottel#DT|'''D'''or'''<!-- -->ft'''ro'''tt'''el]] ([[User talk:Dorftrottel|complain]]) 14:00, [[April 2]], 200<!--DT-->8 |
Revision as of 14:00, 2 April 2008
Assume good faith!![]() |
|||||
There are currently 6,879,089 articles and 924,603 files on English Wikipedia. The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.
The truth resists simplicity. | |||||
TALK PAGE OF とある白い猫
{{{ovr| To post a new topic please use this link or the 'new section' between "edit this page" and "history". | |||||
PostsHelloHi, I was wondering if you were available to look into a matter. -- Cat chi? 18:37, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
"Cosmetic surgery" and the surgical specialty of "Plastic and reconstructive surgery" are not the same thing. They should be separate articles. Please explain why the article on cosmetics is consistently being redirected to a different article about a related but separate topic (ie. the specialty of PRS). Jwri7474 (talk) 22:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
"Cosmetic surgery" and the surgical specialty of "Plastic and reconstructive surgery" are not the same thing. They should be separate articles. Please explain why the article on cosmetics is consistently being redirected to a different article about a related but separate topic (ie. the specialty of PRS). Jwri7474 (talk) 22:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Here are some examples of the current representative bodies for "cosmetic surgery":
http://www.americanboardcosmeticsurgery.org/fellowship_route.php training requirements for US board certification in cosmetic surgery] Even without fellowship training in cosmetics, many specialties teach cosmetics as part of their standard residency training program (example Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial surgery Board certification exams have a substantial component devoted to cosmetics 15-30%) There are many medical/surgical specialties that utilise cosmetic surgical techniques and procedures and are equally licensed to provide such procedures, not only the surgical specialty of "Plastic and reconstructive surgery". Redirecting the entire article to the Plastic surgery article suggests a certain POV that only Plastic surgeons can provide cosmetic procedures to the public and this is not true. Jwri7474 (talk) 23:09, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
I posted the information on your talk page because you commented on my page, so I thought you were interested in helping with the situation. Sorry, if there was any confusion. The article I'm speaking about is the "Cosmetic surgery" article which now has been redirected to "Plastic surgery".Jwri7474 (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Interwiki on wikisource:elI created more interwiki links on Greek wikisource, so if you have a chance, could you run interwiki again? thanks. Andreas (T) 14:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
TunaIs fishing an art form?Thriley (talk) 02:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC) Oh My Goddess! related character articlesHi, I was the author of most of these articles. I was wondering what is going on... :/ -- Cat chi? 15:01, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
QuestionSo, White Cat... I have a Shadow Gelert character available. Want him? -(Doofallslya v^_^v) Ékséj 06:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:RFA statementHello. Could you please trim down/refactor your statement on WP:RFA? It currently stands much over the 500 word limit. — Coren (talk) for the Arbitration Committee 22:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Looking for Wikipedians for a User StudyHello. I am a graduate student in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Minnesota. We are conducting research on ways to engage content experts on Wikipedia. Previously, Wikipedia started the Adopt-a-User program to allow new users to get to know seasoned Wikipedia editors. We are interested in learning more about how this type of relationship works. Based on your editing record on Wikipedia, we thought you might be interested in participating. If chosen to participate, you will be compensated for your time. We estimate that most participants will spend an hour (over two weeks on your own time and from your own computer) on the study. To learn more or to sign up contact KATPA at CS dot UMN dot EDU or User:KatherinePanciera/WPMentoring. Thanks. KatherinePanciera (talk) 02:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Resurrected discussion from February
Hi, I just wanted to point out a follow up. :) -- Cat chi? 10:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
|