Talk:Charlton Heston: Difference between revisions
→All right already: there is such a word |
|||
Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
== All right already == |
== All right already == |
||
There is no such word as "alright." The phrase is spelled "all right." Elementary school grammar. |
There is no such word as "alright." The phrase is spelled "all right." Elementary school grammar. |
||
:There certainly is such a word, just as there is such a word as "ain't". The fact that certain authorities don't like it doesn't make it go away! It's not (currently) generally accepted as Standard English, but that's not to say it never will be. After all, within living memory the style "Downing-street" was widely used. [[Special:Contributions/86.132.137.5|86.132.137.5]] ([[User talk:86.132.137.5|talk]]) 04:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Also, please, in second references to people, unless there are two or more people with the same last name in the article, the name used should be the last name. Hence, "Gore Vidal" becomes "Vidal," not "Gore." --[[Special:Contributions/208.106.59.58|208.106.59.58]] ([[User talk:208.106.59.58|talk]]) 18:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC) |
Also, please, in second references to people, unless there are two or more people with the same last name in the article, the name used should be the last name. Hence, "Gore Vidal" becomes "Vidal," not "Gore." --[[Special:Contributions/208.106.59.58|208.106.59.58]] ([[User talk:208.106.59.58|talk]]) 18:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:43, 6 April 2008
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Charlton Heston article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
![]() | Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Politics and Government B‑class | ||||||||||||
|
![]() | Chicago B‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Illinois B‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
Racist?
The photo on the front from 63 is during the equal cival rites march,yet in Bowling for Columbine,theres an indication that hes anti-multiculturalism.Im interested to know what this mans stance is on race.as ive also noted that he was a staunch Democrat and is now a Republican.
- When Heston spoke of problems with Civil Rights in that skilfully edited interview he was actually talking about the problems in getting the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964. Just because he later switched parties does not mean he abandoned his belief in equal rights. (Chunda18 20:19, 13 May 2007 (UTC))
- Neither being a Republican, nor being "anti-multiculturalism" is the same as or something that indicates the presence of, racism Twfowler 15:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Photo of Heston
This picture is rather old. Can we find another that doesn't date from the sixties? --Saforrest 00:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- It is unlikely that we could find another free image of that quality. Arniep 01:20, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Birthdate
For the love of God, Heston was born in 1923. I have all his books, I think he knows the right date........
- Forgive me, but you are a bit naive here about how the old studio system worked. Old-time actors were notorious for providing inaccurate information about their own birthdates. Actors from Humphrey Bogart to Al "Grandpa" Lewis tweaked their birthdates anywhere from a few days to 13 years. Some actors even had their birthdates changed by the studios for PR purposes. Unfortunately, after 60 years, it becomes difficult to change the date back without embarrassment. Without a certified copy of a birth certificate obtained directly from the registrar of the state in question (in other words, not from the actor himself or his representative but directly from the government), I would not accept the word of any old-time actor as to his birthdate. --Charlene.fic 16:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Since every other source I find on the internet says 1924 as the year of birth, I have changed it to that date. When he dies, we'll see how old they report him as. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.39.189.36 (talk) 20:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC).
Trivia sections are the scourge of wikipedia pop-culture articles
WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY just copy out the (already stupid) trivia section on the IMDB and paste it here? It serves no purpose and is almost certainly a copyright violation. If no-one can advise me otherwise in the next few days I will delete the whole section wholesale. Badgerpatrol 01:04, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Yes, it's a copyvio, so no keep. Tawker 00:51, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- Done. As a compromise, I have added an explanatory note to the IMDB link. Badgerpatrol 00:53, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- Much of the info in the "Trivia" section was not trivia, such as the names of his children and his tenure as president of SAG. I hope we're not throwing out the baby with the bathwater. -Will Beback 05:28, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- Done. As a compromise, I have added an explanatory note to the IMDB link. Badgerpatrol 00:53, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- My major complaint was not the content (although much of it was naff), but rather the fact that it was ripped off from the IMDB, almost word-for-word. It looked amateurish at best, and at worst was a copyright violation (IMDB material is copyright). I agree that some of it (if verifiable) would enhance the article if it could be added as proper, continuous prose. Cheers, Badgerpatrol 22:06, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- How can we be sure that imdb contributors didnt copy some of the info from Wikipedia? Arniep 16:11, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- Ha- Touche! How do you want to prove that however? Assuming it is copyright material- which I think is likely- is it more parsimonious (and legally safest) to assume (given that these 'trivia' sections are the accepted format on IMDB but not ubiquitous on wikipedia) that the material originated here or there? The style is VERY reminiscent of IMDB, as I'm sure we all agree. Also, apart from the copyright issue (which may be debatable, I'm not a lawyer), what's your opinion of the actual format of the section itself? I must confess, I think that these sections are amateurish and silly. I strongly agree that (if verifiable) some of the information could go back into the main article, but only as continuous prose rather than bullet-point text - consisting of such illuminating statements as:
- Prior to starring in The Omega Man, a remake of Vincent Price's film The Last Man On Earth, Heston and Price appeared together in Cecil B. Demille's The Ten Commandments. - His wife calls him Charlie, but everyone else calls him Chuck. - While they were starring in a play together in 1960, Laurence Olivier told Heston that he had the potential to become the greatest American actor of the century. Although the play received unfavorable notices, Olivier told Heston that he must to learn to forget good notices in order to do better next time. - *His favorite food is Loushka; a Hungarian dish made with noodles, spinach, and chicken broth. - Was nicknamed "Cheston," on his appearance on "Space Ghost: Coast to Coast" (Episode 3.20, "Dam")
Ahem. If this material originated on wikipedia, then it was contributed by a very poor editor (or, more likely, a very inexperienced one). In any case, these bullet points are a) not continuous text; and b) not verified ('Any unsourced material may be challenged and removed.'). I do not feel that it is a valuable contribution to the article. Equally, I do not feel myself to be knowledgable enough re this subject to separate the wheat from the chaff. I gave prior notice of my intention to delete this section, and received only one assent and no dissenters. If you however feel that reverting to the previous version improves the article (I do not, and I believe that my opinion (re these trivia sections) is shared by other wikipedians, although I accept fully that there are no hard-and-fast rules), or that you have the specialist knowledge to pick out and properly reference the material worth preserving, then please do so! Cheers, Badgerpatrol 21:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
The Olivier item has been corrected on the imdb. What Olivier was basically saying to Heston was that in order to improve as an actor it is essential to forget good reviews, and instead look at the bad notices to understand how one can do better next time.
Year of birth
There seems to be a dispute over the year of birth. Does anyone have a hardcopy of one of his memoirs? -Will Beback 21:39, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I have an original copy of "In the Arena", first published in 1995. Heston writes, "In 1933, when I was ten ..."
In his book, "The Actor's Life", he mentions turning 35 while shooting "Ben-Hur" in Rome, October, 1958.
That means he was born in 1923!! 58 minus 35 is 23!!! This is from his own journals. He was born in 1923...NO DOUBT. I met him in April 1998 here in OKC.~~MikeR~~
- The sources all say 1924. All we have on 1923 is your word, no actual evidence. Wahkeenah 01:19, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Heston himself said he was born in 1923, I think he knows better than any Internet sources. He was 28 when he made "The Greatest Show On Earth", DeMille probably thought it was better to say he was 27.
Some sources say he was born in 1922. (92.10.26.26 (talk) 09:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC))
Politics
Was Heston actually against Nixon and Vietnam as the article says, because according to the Internet Movie Database he attended Richard Nixon's victory celebration in 1972 along with John Wayne, Clint Eastwood and Glenn Ford.
Actor George Clooney was quoted as saying that Heston deserved Alzheimer's …
This is not supported by the link which is provided, which only quotes Clooney as saying that Heston deserved whatever was said about him. Corrected. Aretnap 19:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Missing Something
Shouldn't something be said about his announcement that he has Alzheimer's Disease? Looking over the talk pages, I realize there was some controversy about that a while back, but shouldn't there at least be a sentence in the article mentioning it?Gershwinrb 06:37, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- There is. Badgerpatrol 15:30, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Whoops, my mistake, didn't see that there. Gershwinrb 05:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
This is more of a question. Back in the mid 70's I often received mail from an organization calling itself ZPG (Zero Population Growth) whose concern was that world population was in a headlong plunge toward overwhelming our resouces. If my memory is correct, Charlton Heston was the spokesman for the organization then. Am I correct? Al Gore in his Inconvenient (or Unwelcome)Truth, has sounded the same alarm... which of course would be a very different (and welcome)alliance between the two.
Quotes
How about moving the quotes to wikiquote (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Charlton_Heston) an deleting them here, and then concentrate on Heston and not what he might have said?
- It's always better to move quotes to Wikiquote. -Will Beback 22:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Location of birth?
Here it says St. Helen, Michigan, but imdb.com says Evanston, Illinois. Which is it? Fistful of Questions 04:53, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Just discovered this anonymous IP edit that seemed to have no purpose other than to vandalize and provide false information. Fistful of Questions 01:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- That was unintentional vandalism - I honestly thought Heston's birthyear was 1924 and corrected it. There seems to be considerable confusion about whether he was born in 1923 or 1924. Sorry for the misinformation. 18.243.5.40 05:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Did Charlton Heston star in a Movie about an aging Quarterback? Was it called "The Pro"?
David McClellan
It was called "Number One" (1969).Sensei48 (talk) 11:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Charlton Heston & ZPG
Back in the 70's I received a lot of mail from an organization calling itself ZPG (Zero Population Growth) whose concern was that world population was rapidly exceeding our resources and needed to be volutarily reigned in as a prefered solution to famine, pestilence, & war. If I remember right, Charlton Heston was the spokesman for the organization and the mail was from him. Am I correct? 4.242.150.44 17:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Al (ALTRKR@earthlink.net)
When did he became Charlton?
Charlton is his mother's maiden name...
It is stated at the beginning that he was born John Charles Carter and then got the surname Heston when his mother remarried, but how and when exactly did he became Charlton? I can see no answer to that question in the article. KMA "HF" N 18:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Cold dead hands quote
In the article it states that Heston held up a Sharps rifle. According to the NRA it was a hand made Pennsylvania rifle made by Master rifle maker Cecil Brooks. Here is a link to an NRA article about the rifle maker and the famous Heston quote. http://www.nrapublications.org/TAR/CecilBrooks.asp Wallyyoung 02:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Reference to CH in Midnight Oil song
Something minor, but I figured I'd mention it. Midnight Oil's song 'Shipyards of New Zealand' from Red Sails in the Sunset, Charlton Heston is mentioned: Now danger lurks behind the spreader / And Charlton Heston casts the first stone / User interference birthmarks / Clever, not very wise --81.165.171.208 18:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
All right already
There is no such word as "alright." The phrase is spelled "all right." Elementary school grammar.
- There certainly is such a word, just as there is such a word as "ain't". The fact that certain authorities don't like it doesn't make it go away! It's not (currently) generally accepted as Standard English, but that's not to say it never will be. After all, within living memory the style "Downing-street" was widely used. 86.132.137.5 (talk) 04:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Also, please, in second references to people, unless there are two or more people with the same last name in the article, the name used should be the last name. Hence, "Gore Vidal" becomes "Vidal," not "Gore." --208.106.59.58 (talk) 18:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- In addition, there is an example here of what is a misunderstanding of the term "cult" when applied to films, a misunderstanding that crops up repeatedly on Wiki. A "cult film" is one that received little general attention critically and financially at the time of its release but that acquired a usually small but dedicated fan base that (sometimes stubbornly) maintained that the film was misunderstood, underappreciated, or unjustly neglected. Some cult films' appeal remains restricted to just such a self-perpetuating fan base even decades later; others eventually graduate to a more widespread critical and at times financial success.
- Virtually all of Heston's films after about 1950 were major studio releases; after The Ten Commandments through at least 1980, virtually all of those were A movies. Soylent Green and Omega Man were major movies that attracted quite a bit of critical comment at the time, both positive and negative - not at all "cult" films.
- Nonetheless, a few of Heston's films might qualify - his little-seen and often-bashed 1970 Julius Caesar has its fans, as does the essentially indie production by his son Frazier of the 1980 The Mountain Men. However, the Heston movie that has the best claim to cult status is 1968's Will Penny, written and directed by Tom Gries. This film was (arguably) Heston;s most successful performance and movie with critics, and it does indeed have an avid fan base that points to it (and Major Dundee) as probably the first of the revisionist Westerns that became so popular in the 1970s. Sensei48 (talk) 05:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- High-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- High-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Chicago articles
- Mid-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles
- B-Class WikiProject Illinois articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Illinois articles