Talk:Exit Wounds (Torchwood): Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 90.210.78.64 - "→Death Spoiler: - comment" |
m GEOS reference |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
The British have this annoying habit of using "series" where the rest of the world uses "season" - if they won't respect this when writing for wikipedia perhaps there should be a tooltip or something to the casual user isn't totally confused. --[[User:IceHunter|IceHunter]] ([[User talk:IceHunter|talk]]) 20:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
The British have this annoying habit of using "series" where the rest of the world uses "season" - if they won't respect this when writing for wikipedia perhaps there should be a tooltip or something to the casual user isn't totally confused. --[[User:IceHunter|IceHunter]] ([[User talk:IceHunter|talk]]) 20:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
:"series" is the correct term in Britain and since this is a British program then the word series should be used, especially since the BBC call it Torchwood series 2, not season 2[[User:NIKKKIN|NIKKKIN]] ([[User talk:NIKKKIN|talk]]) 16:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
:"series" is the correct term in Britain and since this is a British program then the word series should be used, especially since the BBC call it Torchwood series 2, not season 2[[User:NIKKKIN|NIKKKIN]] ([[User talk:NIKKKIN|talk]]) 16:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
== GEOS reference == |
|||
I think that this reference should be removed. Firstlt it can be a spoiler for next season. And secondly, it's even probably wrong. That same source talked about the filming of the 2009 Doctor Who Specials being underway while they were actually still shooting season four (and they won't start shooting those specials until January 2009. While they've started shooting this Christmas Special these days). Also, I think it's possible they mixed up John *Barrowman* with John *Hart* for being "recurring" next year. And anyway the source is not GEOS, it's SCI-FI Pulse http://scifipulse.net/Dr_Who/ChangesForWho_Torchwood.html (if you want to keep the reference, I really wouldn't). [[User:LazLong|Laz]] ([[User talk:LazLong|talk]]) 19:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:17, 6 April 2008
Doctor Who: Torchwood Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Exit Wounds (Torchwood) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Spoiler
This article contained what was blatantly advertised as a rumour in place of a synopsis. I deleted this to prevent anyone reading it and having the episode spoilt. 90.192.94.73 (talk) 20:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Although it's not the spoilers we're worried about; it's because it is totally unsourced and unverifiable. — Edokter • Talk • 20:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- the episode is finished now can we add the plot?--Lerdthenerd (talk) 20:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Lachlan Nieboer
Who is this Lachlan Nieboer, and why do people keep adding him to the cast without a source? — Edokter • Talk • 19:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Sentence Removal
I don't know that it's really worth mentioning, but I took out "Captain John wants Jack to make The Beast with a Two Backs ". It's a sentence fragment, I have no idea what it's supposed to say, and it sounds like it's an unsourced piece of plot. justaredherring (talk) 15:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
It refers to them being attracted to each other. Pureferret (talk) 20:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Death Spoiler
Someone has just posted about the two characters deaths. Should this be removed/put behind a cut? Pureferret (talk) 21:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Does it matter now? The episode has ended.--Lerdthenerd (talk) 21:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- That doesn't mean everyone has seen it. I assumed there would be a Synopsis and a Plot section. Pureferret (talk) 21:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- write it up properly, so far the IPs have wrote it up as gibberish.--Lerdthenerd (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- I am trying to correct some of it now, but with such poor grammar I gave up and may being from scratch rather than fixing what has already been writtenNIKKKIN (talk) 21:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- its also becoming hard to write every time someone deletes it!--Lerdthenerd (talk) 21:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, i wrote something relevant but i got the links and font size wrong by accident. Im not sure how to do this so could someone sort it out please. Thank you 82.39.116.172 (talk) 21:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I dont think there is a problem with putting a death spoiler in. If people are reading in that far I think its pretty clear they want to know what happened. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.210.78.64 (talk) 17:07, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Annoying use of "series"
The British have this annoying habit of using "series" where the rest of the world uses "season" - if they won't respect this when writing for wikipedia perhaps there should be a tooltip or something to the casual user isn't totally confused. --IceHunter (talk) 20:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- "series" is the correct term in Britain and since this is a British program then the word series should be used, especially since the BBC call it Torchwood series 2, not season 2NIKKKIN (talk) 16:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
GEOS reference
I think that this reference should be removed. Firstlt it can be a spoiler for next season. And secondly, it's even probably wrong. That same source talked about the filming of the 2009 Doctor Who Specials being underway while they were actually still shooting season four (and they won't start shooting those specials until January 2009. While they've started shooting this Christmas Special these days). Also, I think it's possible they mixed up John *Barrowman* with John *Hart* for being "recurring" next year. And anyway the source is not GEOS, it's SCI-FI Pulse http://scifipulse.net/Dr_Who/ChangesForWho_Torchwood.html (if you want to keep the reference, I really wouldn't). Laz (talk) 19:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)