User talk:77.42.187.213

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SMS ^Talk 17:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. SMS ^Talk 17:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Re: Zulfikar Ali Bhutto

Bring a reference and change it hundered times. And please be civil. --SMS ^Talk 17:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I told you and now telling you again to be civil, don't assume things about other's parents and here at Wikipedia no one believes anything until you bring a verifiable reference. --SMS ^Talk 17:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

---

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 20:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

77.42.187.213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You should take have looked at the edits before blocking me. I was reverting edits that were made by an anon two weeks ago on April 1st and April 15 by Special:Contributions/81.149.22.123. User:Smsarmad was reverting my reversions of these edits and, instead of blocking User:Smsarmad who is most likely the anon, User:Edgar181 blocked me.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=You should take have looked at the edits before blocking me. I was reverting edits that were made by an anon two weeks ago on April 1st and April 15 by [[Special:Contributions/81.149.22.123]]. [[User:Smsarmad]] was reverting my reversions of these edits and, instead of blocking [[User:Smsarmad]] who is most likely the anon, [[User:Edgar181]] blocked me. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=You should take have looked at the edits before blocking me. I was reverting edits that were made by an anon two weeks ago on April 1st and April 15 by [[Special:Contributions/81.149.22.123]]. [[User:Smsarmad]] was reverting my reversions of these edits and, instead of blocking [[User:Smsarmad]] who is most likely the anon, [[User:Edgar181]] blocked me. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=You should take have looked at the edits before blocking me. I was reverting edits that were made by an anon two weeks ago on April 1st and April 15 by [[Special:Contributions/81.149.22.123]]. [[User:Smsarmad]] was reverting my reversions of these edits and, instead of blocking [[User:Smsarmad]] who is most likely the anon, [[User:Edgar181]] blocked me. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}