User talk:Gurch: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:48, 17 May 2008

Welcome!

Hi Gurch! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Longhair | Talk 10:37, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

WBOSITG's RfA

Hello Gurch, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for your participation in my RfA which was passed with a final tally of 114/10/4. I'm both shocked and honoured to gain so much support from users whom I admire and trust, and I hope I can avoid breaking that backing by being the best administrator I possibly can. I will take on board the opposition's comments and I hope to improve over the coming months and years. Once again, thank you! weburiedoursecrets inthegarden 20:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:24.61.101.183 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gurchzilla (talk) 22:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle stuff

I should have said in amongst the feature requests, that I'm really pleased with Huggle as it is, and I do appreciate the work you've put into it - it really makes an otherwise unpleasant task much more comfortable, and gives the pleasantly smug feeling that quite a lot of vandalism is now more hard work for the vandals than for the AV editors... Pseudomonas_(talk) 09:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My editor review

I'm not assuming that edit count makes me a more valued contributor than someone with say, 500 edits. It's the actual contributions that count overall. As i'd reached that milestone I thought I'd ask for a review. Am mulling over whether to go for admin at some point in the future and I think a review would be worthwhile. Mjroots (talk) 17:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thank-spam

Gurch, just a note of thanks for your participation in my request for adminship, which ended successfully with 112 supports, 2 opposes, and 1 neutral. If there's something I've realized during my RFA process this last week, it's that adminship is primarily about trust. I will strive to honour that trust in my future interactions with the community. Gatoclass (talk) 06:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 I'm not assuming that edit count makes me a more valued contributor than someone with say, 500 edits. It's the actual contributions that count overall. As i'd reached that milestone I thought I'd ask for a review. Am mulling over whether to go for admin at some point in the future and I think a review would be worthwhile. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 17:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
+== RfA thank-spam ==
+<div style="background-color: white; border: #5B92E5 solid 2px; margin-bottom:.5em; padding: 5px; font-family: trebuchet ms, sans-serif;">[[Image:Broom_icon.svg|left|75px]]<font color="#084C9E">'''{{PAGENAME}}''', just a note of thanks for your participation in my '''[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gatoclass 2|request for adminship]]''', which ended successfully with '''112''' supports, '''2''' opposes, and '''1''' neutral. If there's something I've realized during my RFA process this last week, it's that adminship is primarily about trust. I will strive to honour that trust in my future interactions with the community. </font> [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 06:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)</div>