Talk:Ready to Die: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:14, 28 June 2008

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ready to Die article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ready to Die has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 14, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
May 19, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Good article

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Albums GA‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Hip hop GA‑class Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Readytodieoriginalalbumcover.jpg

Image:Readytodieoriginalalbumcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remaster: better or worse?

Does anyone know, *from an audiophile point of view* weather the remaster of RTD is considered better quality (sonically) or worse?? is there any discussion of this on the internet anywhere? whilst you would hope it would be better a lot of remasters have been done very badly with all dynamic range being destroyed by maxing the volumes of all audio tracks, for example. ~Mr IP —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.65.198 (talk) 20:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA on hold

Refs #2 and #9 need publishers and accessdates. I'm not sure why ref #11 ([1]) is reliable, it appears to be a blog. There are also a few minor MoS issues, for example a space between the ref and the period and miscapitalisations in the lead. Minor issues that can be easily fixed. naerii - talk 20:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've took care of the things you brought up, I removed the 'Re-Issues' section because it was unnecessary and I cleaned-up all the refs. - Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 22:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great, I'll go fill in all the forms now ;) naerii - talk 10:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

censoring

some of the EXPLICIT cd is censored[2]

is this in all pressings? --66.158.232.98 (talk) 18:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 :I've took care of the things you brought up, I removed the 'Re-Issues' section because it was unnecessary and I cleaned-up all the refs. - [[User:Guerilla In Tha Mist|Guerilla In Tha Mist]] ([[User talk:Guerilla In Tha Mist|talk]]) 22:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 ::Looks great, I'll go fill in all the forms now ;) <small>'''[[User:Naerii|<font face="verdana" color="#CC0099">naerii</font>]] - [[User talk:Naerii|<font face="verdana" color="#CC0099">talk</font>]]'''</small> 10:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
+== censoring ==
+some of the EXPLICIT cd is censored[http://www.rapreviews.com/archive/BTTL_readytodie.html]
+is this in all pressings? --[[Special:Contributions/66.158.232.98|66.158.232.98]] ([[User talk:66.158.232.98|talk]]) 18:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)