Dream argument: Difference between revisions
Jeff Silvers (talk | contribs) m Heading capitalization. |
→Simulated reality: removed contentious rubbish |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
A paradox concerning dreams and the nature of reality was described by the British writer [[Eric Bond Hutton]] in 1989.<ref>See "Hutton's Paradox", ''Gift of Fire'', June 1993. The paradox made its first appearance in "Adversaria V", ''Write Justified'', Spring 1989.</ref> As a child Hutton often had [[lucid dreaming|lucid dreams]] in which people and things seemed as solid and real as in waking life. This led him to wonder whether life itself was a dream, even whether he existed only in somebody else's dream. Once in a while he would have a [[pre-lucid dream]] (in which one suspects that one is dreaming). He always found these somewhat disturbing, but one day hit upon a magic formula to be used in them: "If I find myself asking 'Am I dreaming?' it proves that I am, since this question would never occur to me in waking life." Yet, such is the nature of dreams, he could never recall it when he needed to. Many years later, when he came to write about his childhood fascination with dreams, he was struck by a contradiction in his earlier reasoning. True, asking oneself "Am I dreaming?" ''in a dream'' would seem to prove that one is. And yet that is precisely what he had often asked himself in waking life. Therein lay a paradox. What was he to conclude? That it does not prove one is dreaming, or that life really is a dream? |
A paradox concerning dreams and the nature of reality was described by the British writer [[Eric Bond Hutton]] in 1989.<ref>See "Hutton's Paradox", ''Gift of Fire'', June 1993. The paradox made its first appearance in "Adversaria V", ''Write Justified'', Spring 1989.</ref> As a child Hutton often had [[lucid dreaming|lucid dreams]] in which people and things seemed as solid and real as in waking life. This led him to wonder whether life itself was a dream, even whether he existed only in somebody else's dream. Once in a while he would have a [[pre-lucid dream]] (in which one suspects that one is dreaming). He always found these somewhat disturbing, but one day hit upon a magic formula to be used in them: "If I find myself asking 'Am I dreaming?' it proves that I am, since this question would never occur to me in waking life." Yet, such is the nature of dreams, he could never recall it when he needed to. Many years later, when he came to write about his childhood fascination with dreams, he was struck by a contradiction in his earlier reasoning. True, asking oneself "Am I dreaming?" ''in a dream'' would seem to prove that one is. And yet that is precisely what he had often asked himself in waking life. Therein lay a paradox. What was he to conclude? That it does not prove one is dreaming, or that life really is a dream? |
||
==Simulated reality== |
|||
Dreaming provides a springboard for those who question whether our own reality may be an illusion. The ability of the brain to trick itself into believing a neuronally generated world is the "real world" means at least one variety of simulated reality is a common, even nightly event. |
|||
Those who argue that the world is not simulated must concede that the mind — at least the sleeping mind — is not itself a reliable mechanism for an analysis attempting to differentiate reality from illusion by nature of its own inability to distinguish between reality states. |
|||
This could be seen as a challenge to those who claim a simulated reality requires highly advanced scientific technology, since the only apparatus needed to construct a simulated reality capable of fooling the unconscious mind is a human brain. |
|||
==References in popular culture== |
==References in popular culture== |
Revision as of 13:00, 11 July 2008
The "dream argument" is the postulation that the act of dreaming provides preliminary evidence that the senses we trust to distinguish reality from illusion should not be fully trusted, and therefore any state that is dependent on our senses should at the very least be carefully examined and rigorously tested to determine if it is in fact "reality."
Synopsis
While people dream, they usually do not realize they are dreaming (in non-lucid dreams). This has led philosophers to wonder whether one could actually be dreaming constantly, instead of being in waking reality (or at least that one can't be certain that he or she is not dreaming). In the West, the philosophical puzzle is referred to as early as Plato (Theaetetus 158b-d) and Aristotle (Metaphysics 1011a6). Having received serious attention in René Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy, the dream argument has become one of the most popular skeptical hypotheses.
In the East, this type of argument is well known as "Zhuangzi dreamed he was a butterfly" (莊周夢蝶 Zhuāng Zhōu mèng dié) introduced by Zhuangzi. It relates that one night Zhuangzi dreamed that he was a carefree butterfly flying happily. After he woke up, he wondered how he could determine whether he was Zhuangzi who had just finished dreaming he was a butterfly, or a butterfly who had just started dreaming he was Zhuangzi. This was a metaphor for what he referred to as a "great dream."
He who dreams of drinking wine may weep when morning comes; he who dreams of weeping may in the morning go off to hunt. While he is dreaming he does not know it is a dream, and in his dream he may even try to interpret a dream. Only after he wakes does he know it was a dream. And someday there will be a great awakening when we know that this is all a great dream. Yet the stupid believe they are awake, busily and brightly assuming they understand things, calling this man ruler, that one herdsman ‑ how dense! Confucius and you are both dreaming! And when I say you are dreaming, I am dreaming, too. Words like these will be labeled the Supreme Swindle. Yet, after ten thousand generations, a great sage may appear who will know their meaning, and it will still be as though he appeared with astonishing speed.[1]
Hutton's Paradox
A paradox concerning dreams and the nature of reality was described by the British writer Eric Bond Hutton in 1989.[2] As a child Hutton often had lucid dreams in which people and things seemed as solid and real as in waking life. This led him to wonder whether life itself was a dream, even whether he existed only in somebody else's dream. Once in a while he would have a pre-lucid dream (in which one suspects that one is dreaming). He always found these somewhat disturbing, but one day hit upon a magic formula to be used in them: "If I find myself asking 'Am I dreaming?' it proves that I am, since this question would never occur to me in waking life." Yet, such is the nature of dreams, he could never recall it when he needed to. Many years later, when he came to write about his childhood fascination with dreams, he was struck by a contradiction in his earlier reasoning. True, asking oneself "Am I dreaming?" in a dream would seem to prove that one is. And yet that is precisely what he had often asked himself in waking life. Therein lay a paradox. What was he to conclude? That it does not prove one is dreaming, or that life really is a dream?
References in popular culture
In Lewis Carrol's Through the Looking-Glass, Alice finds the Red King asleep in the grass; Tweedledum and Tweedledee tell her that the Red King is dreaming about her, and that if he were to wake up she would "go out—bang!—just like a candle."
In the Matrix series, people inside the Matrix itself are dreaming, but not knowing it. Neo, the hero of the movie, is rescued by a band of real people and embarks upon freeing the rest.
Notes
- ^ Zhuangzi, Discussion on making all things equal.
- ^ See "Hutton's Paradox", Gift of Fire, June 1993. The paradox made its first appearance in "Adversaria V", Write Justified, Spring 1989.
See also
- Evil genius
- Lucid dreaming
- Maya (illusion)
- The Matrix, a fictional example of dream argument
- Reality in Buddhism
- Simulation hypothesis
- Simulated reality
- Social simulation
- Voltaire
- Waking Life
- Meta-universe