User talk:Chirag/Archive 02

Your comment on the Deletion page for Garib Rath

You said "I'm not an admin, so I'm not sure if my two bits count". To answer that, yes, they do. Everyone's opinion counts on Articles for Deletion; the strength of the arguments is what matters, not who makes it.--CastAStone/^{/₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€} 13:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

• You do not need to be an Admin to comment on an AFD; I am not and often comment. The issue seems to be whether we should have the article Garib Rath Express or Garib Rath: there is no need to have both as they are duplicates. Do you have a view on which it should be? If so, I would suggest that you add to your previous comments on the AFD page. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:40, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

indian media

saw your post on the wikiproject india discussion board about help on this subject. Drop me a line as to what you need. Lihaas (talk) 03:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I have replied to your question in WP:INDIA discussion board. I hope that helps -- Tinu Cherian - 09:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Category:Indian media

Hi Chirag. I have started reverting your edits because the newspapers and magazines are categorised as "newspapers/magazines in India", which are a subcategory of Indian media, so they are redundant in acordance with Wikipedia policy. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 11:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Indian media reply

Im afraid I dont quite get your q. As far as I know you should add all categories, even if its a subcategory. But maybe i don't get the q. fully. Lihaas (talk) 01:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Indian Media

Yes I realised that. I was waiting for this weekend to revert them. We can divide the work so it gets done faster. Let me know, if that works with you. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 12:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Crap! you shouldn't have reverted... there were other changes I made there... You should have just deleted the category... ChiragPatnaik (talk) 12:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

one more thing. something similar is also the case with television channels. as in. It is an Indian television station as well as a member of Indian television. indian television stations is a member of Indian Televisions. will u be making those changes as well? ChiragPatnaik (talk) 13:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, television is a subset of media. I think because you have AWB, it is faster for you to order it to remove a supercat if it is already in the subcat. I don't have AWB. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

triservices crest

if the crest is wrong on one site it should be on the original too. Can you remove it from there as well? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CISF (im not credible on this subject, i admit i don't know, so it makes more sense if you do it, no?) Lihaas (talk) 19:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Banglore rename

dont behave funny its genuine because I think state govt have changed its name to Bengaluru....so there should not be any hesitation to use this word...world and state people have also accepted this...i dont know why you not? Bombay->Mumbai, Madras->Chennai, Calcutta->Kolkata....have you any objection on this matters also?....still you have any doubt then i m ready to discuss this issue..Alokprasad84 (talk) 05:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

• its not a matter of anyone's personal interest to recognise any of our big city with a perticular name...most of the local or even distant resident know Varanasi as Banaras...i respect them and even i use Banaras generally, but every body (at official places) know its Varanasi...similar in case of Vadodara/Baroda...Now come to the point...yeah Banglore is popular but at one time Madras was also equally popular..if you are asking my personal opinion, yes I want that world know Bangalore as Bengaluru in future and wikipedia is a very big platform where we should aside our emotions and use things as such..wikipedia is not only limited to some section of peoples its' open for all world. if anyone want to use Banglore then he should use it in parenthesis with denotion previously known as or something like this.Alokprasad84 (talk) 11:26, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:SAB TV Shows

I have nominated Category:SAB TV Shows (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:SAB TV television series (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 05:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request

Hello ChiragPatnaik, I've granted your request for rollback. Please remember that rollback should only be used on clear cases of vandalism, spam, or trolling. Abuse/misuse of the tool, either by reverting good-faith edits or revert-warring, will lead to the removal of the tool. If you have to revert an edit, but need to explain why you're reverting it, don't use rollback. For practice with rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 16:54, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. Acalamari 18:51, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Nelly Makdessy

hey! I want to fix this article but you don't let me do it! you called that vandalism but it isn't, the currently written in the section "2002–2003: Ahli Arab, Ana Eih, scandal and move to Rotana Records" doesn't match with the subject and it is written twice! the same in the "Early years" is in "2002–2003: Ahli Arab, Ana Eih, scandal and move to Rotana Records" I want to write right information about that section but you call it vandalism!! OOOOOOh come on! and you even want to block me :@