User talk:134.148.5.118: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:25, 4 August 2008

This is 134.148.5.118's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your recent edit to Kim Schmitz (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 01:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

edit to Telstra article

Warning 1:

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Mikecraig 04:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NSW/Wollongong

I've reverted your downgrading of Wollongong to a 'mini-city' on the NSW article. It's approaching the size of Canberra, it's not small. ajdlinux 00:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Geology. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxymoron⁸³ 06:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

September 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Caveman on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 23:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Anon vandalism

We usually give warnings and then report them to an administator who has the power to block. MrMurph101 (talk) 03:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jean Piaget, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jean Piaget was changed by 134.148.5.118 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-03-26T07:20:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Irish!} 12:12, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sicko, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism, and ignoring repeated warnings, with the most recent violation being this edit to Sicko. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Nightscream (talk) 17:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

134.148.5.118 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a university IP address.

Decline reason:

That's not a reason to unblock. We frequently get vandalism from schools and universities due to the frequency our site is accessed from such places. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

134.148.5.118 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a university computer. Someone vandalized two pages four days ago. I think it's safe to say they're gone now.

Decline reason:

We have no means of confirming that. If you would like to edit, you may request an account at that link or by emailing the unblock list as described in your block message. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The entire 134.148.0.0/16 block is allocated to the University of Newcastle.
http://www.caul.edu.au/datasets/ds-coord.htm
http://redvip.homelinux.net/varios/www.ipindex.net/b/137.html
Jared Wiltshire (talk) 04:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Antibiotic, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. D0762 (talk) 12:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Australian republic referendum, 1999 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. LeaveSleaves (talk) 10:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harold Scrubby

This user vandalised the page Harold Scruby --Dlatimer (talk) 08:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harold Scrubby

This user vandalised the page Harold Scruby asking the person who the article was about to resign --Dlatimer (talk) 08:20, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Acromegaly has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:01, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Greenbury Point Light constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

- DVD R W is a NAZI - DVD R W is a NAZI - DVD R W is a NAZI - DVD R W is a NAZI - DVD R W is a NAZI

@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 == August 2008 ==
+-
-[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{#if:The Daily Telegraph (Australia)|, as you did to [[:The Daily Telegraph (Australia)]]}}. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:AlexiusHoratius|AlexiusHoratius]] ([[User talk:AlexiusHoratius|talk]]) 06:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
+DVD R W is a NAZI
+-
-[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop your disruptive editing{{#if:The Daily Telegraph (Australia)|, such as the edit you made to [[:The Daily Telegraph (Australia)]]}}. If your [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] continues, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> [[User:AlexiusHoratius|AlexiusHoratius]] ([[User talk:AlexiusHoratius|talk]]) 06:26, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
+DVD R W is a NAZI
+-
-[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits{{#if:The Daily Telegraph (Australia)|, such as the one you made to [[:The Daily Telegraph (Australia)]]}}. If you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> [[User:AlexiusHoratius|AlexiusHoratius]] ([[User talk:AlexiusHoratius|talk]]) 06:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
+DVD R W is a NAZI
+-
-[[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|left|30px]] '''You have been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing''' for violating Wikipedia policy{{#if:|, by {{{1}}}}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your '''[[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|talk page]]''' by adding the text <nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki>. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from [[Wikipedia:List of administrators|this list]] instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. <!-- Template:block -->[[User_talk:DVD R W|dvdrw]] 06:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
+DVD R W is a NAZI
+-
+DVD R W is a NAZI