Talk:Anima: Age of the Robots: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:42, 5 September 2008

Comics Start‑class

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Furry Start‑class Low‑importance

	Anima: Age of the Robots is within the scope of WikiProject Furry, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to furry fandom. For more information, visit the project page.FurryWikipedia:WikiProject FurryTemplate:WikiProject Furryfurry articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Jkktay (talk · contribs)

Concerns

I'm concerned over the notability of this comic. While I'm not a huge fan of WP:COI, if this comic was notable it really shouldn't have required the author to create the article. The one news article was written by a student from the same university and mentions the work only in passing. The "awards" appear entirely non-notable. The links from generic terms (Fantasy comic, Robot comics, Animal comics, Singapore cartoon, Singapore anime, Singapore manga, Singapore comic) ‎are also highly inappropriate. GreenReaper (talk) 06:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some amendments made based on "GreenReaper"'s comments. The 2 articles referenced are NOT written by students from the university of the author. The university's website is the only place where these articles can still be seen from the web, thus the reference.

Please give me a few days to gather more 'external' and 'verifiable' sources. I'm sure they exist.

Jkktay (talk) 07:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 I'm concerned over the notability of this comic. While I'm not a huge fan of [[WP:COI]], if this comic was notable it really shouldn't have required the author to create the article. The one news article was written by a student from the same university and mentions the work only in passing. The "awards" appear entirely non-notable. The links from generic terms (Fantasy comic, Robot comics, Animal comics, Singapore cartoon, Singapore anime, Singapore manga, Singapore comic) ‎are also highly inappropriate. [[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]] ([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]]) 06:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
-== Responses ==
 Some amendments made based on "GreenReaper"'s comments. The 2 articles referenced are NOT written by students from the university of the author. The university's website is the only place where these articles can still be seen from the web, thus the reference.
+Please give me a few days to gather more 'external' and 'verifiable' sources. I'm sure they exist.
-The claim that this webcomic won 3 "amateur web awards" is accurate, implying that the awards are not major and for amateur webmasters.
-The subject of this article is one of the few original comic stories to have been published in singapore, and naturally should be found by anyone looking for 'singapore comics' or 'singapore manga'. The fact that there are no articles existing for these terms shows the drought of the subject matter.
 [[User:Jkktay|Jkktay]] ([[User talk:Jkktay|talk]]) 07:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)