Talk:All Hope Is Gone: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:08, 19 September 2008

This article is currently the WikiProject Slipknot's article of focus! Please help to improve this article to match the standards of a featured article.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the All Hope Is Gone article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

All Hope Is Gone has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 28, 2007	Articles for deletion	Kept
August 7, 2008	Featured topic candidate	Not promoted
August 28, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Slipknot GA‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slipknot, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SlipknotWikipedia:WikiProject SlipknotTemplate:WikiProject SlipknotSlipknot articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Albums GA‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Metal GA‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Genre

This album isn't alternative metal. theres nothing about this album which makes it alternative, besides the fact that they used to play nu metal which is a metal genre influenced from a variety of genres (alternative being one of them). Id say this album is Groove metal and id like to add that onto the page without it being deleted. and its more groove metal as well because as stated in many reviews, they have used a lot more guitar solos now, and when the band was talking about the new album before it was released they stated that they would continue with the thrashy solos and riffing. the reason i am saying all this is because it says not to change the genre name unless discussed on this page. so i guess i need to wait for an agreement of some sort. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Okram 09 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What sources do you have that declare the album Grove Metal? It may be clear as day to you but with reliable sources, it is nothing more than original research and you can't use it on Wikipedia. REZTER ^TALK ø 23:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with your argument, Okram, is that there's no basis but your personal opinion. If we're going off of personal opinions, then it's this simple: I disagree. Now you can't add it. Luckily for you, we don't go on personal opinions, we use reliable sources to prove our claims (click and read the link). If you can prove it's groove metal, come back here and link us. --The Guy _complain ^edits 00:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mispelling

Finnish is spelled as "Finish" in the Chart Positions for different countries. Is it possible for someone to correct it? Alice1869 (talk) 08:39, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Alice1869[reply]

Done. Black ngold29 12:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Number 1 in the world?

I was just wondering if this was noteworthy enough? [1] Is this actually a chart? REZTER ^TALK ø 12:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The album did go number one but those charts don't seem very reliable —Vanishdoom (talk) 13:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, how can you ask if number 1 IN THE WORLD is noteworthy enough to be added. There is chart data for various countries, and even continents already, so why not add it?

Revision as of 00:30, 14 September 2008 edit Dude527 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,241 edits →‎Genre ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:08, 19 September 2008 edit undo 81.79.151.212 (talk) →‎Number 1 in the world? Next edit →
Line 40:		Line 40:

	: The album did go number one but those charts don't seem very reliable [[User:Vanishdoom\|—Vanishdoom]] ([[User talk:Vanishdoom\|talk]]) 13:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)		: The album did go number one but those charts don't seem very reliable [[User:Vanishdoom\|—Vanishdoom]] ([[User talk:Vanishdoom\|talk]]) 13:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

			Honestly, how can you ask if number 1 IN THE WORLD is noteworthy enough to be added. There is chart data for various countries, and even continents already, so why not add it?