User talk:Jengod/Archive-June2009: Difference between revisions
→Images from flickr: new section |
→Images from flickr: in fact, the confusion is only between 2.0 and 3.0 |
||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
*Licence of [[:Image:2878688366 07f279c1be o.jpg]] : [http://www.flickr.com/photos/watchwithkristin/2878688366/ CC-by-sa-2.0]. See [[:Image:Kevin Spacey - hbo post-emmys party.jpg]] on Wikimedia Commons. |
*Licence of [[:Image:2878688366 07f279c1be o.jpg]] : [http://www.flickr.com/photos/watchwithkristin/2878688366/ CC-by-sa-2.0]. See [[:Image:Kevin Spacey - hbo post-emmys party.jpg]] on Wikimedia Commons. |
||
*Licence of [[:Image:NPH 2866542475 13a903bee8 o.jpg]] : [http://www.flickr.com/photos/watchwithkristin/2866542475/in/set-72157607354799509/ CC-by-sa-2.0] |
*Licence of [[:Image:NPH 2866542475 13a903bee8 o.jpg]] : [http://www.flickr.com/photos/watchwithkristin/2866542475/in/set-72157607354799509/ CC-by-sa-2.0] |
||
Licences CC-by and CC-by-sa are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. The others (CC-by-nc (non commercial), CC-by-nd (no derivative work), CC-by-nc-nd) are not enough free for Wikimedia Commons. And you cannot use these licences in Wikipedia except using the [[fair use]]. |
|||
Regards, [[User:Chphe|Chphe]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Chphe|(d)]]</small></sub> 13:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC) |
Regards, [[User:Chphe|Chphe]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Chphe|(d)]]</small></sub> 13:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:00, 17 October 2008
Nonsense of Image talk:Brazilian grasshopper.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image talk:Brazilian grasshopper.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image talk:Brazilian grasshopper.jpg provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image talk:Brazilian grasshopper.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
RE. Speedy delete tag
Hi,
I have no idea how my name was on that very odd speedy delete tag. I'm investigating. Apologies. -- Chzz ► 06:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Upon investigation; it was an error on my part; whilst tryng new software for monitoring newly created pages, this page appeared; the software should not have brought up talk pages; it therefore appeared to me as an article containing the phrase "What a handsome devil! jengod (talk) 05:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)" (ie a new article with this, and nothing more)
- As this appeared (incorrectly) to be a newly created article containing just this, I selected the option to speedily delete it under the 'nonsense' category.
- This problem will not happen again, and I sincerely apologise for any inconvenience caused.
- Given the nature of wikipedia, in which several new pages are posted every minute, and many of them are pure vandalism, I hope you will understand that some degree of automation in monitoring is necessary.
- Unfortunately, your comment was the victim of a 'computer error' during this process.
- Once again, sincere apologies; I fully agree, he is a very handsome devil.
Proposed deletion of The Glory of Christmas
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Glory of Christmas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Potatoswatter (talk) 18:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of The Glory of Christmas
I have nominated The Glory of Christmas, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Glory of Christmas. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Potatoswatter (talk) 14:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for your kind words. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, You uploaded this image of Edgar Wallace which is currently used at [1] and would go well with the English Edgar Wallace article. How does one use it? Please help.... ciao, Rotational (talk) 15:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
NowCommons: Image:23263997 ea7dd2b7fa b.jpg
Image:23263997 ea7dd2b7fa b.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Los Angeles Public Library.jpg. Commons is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image(s) will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Los Angeles Public Library.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
NowCommons: Image:Minnesota-counties-map.gif
Image:Minnesota-counties-map.gif is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Minnesota-counties-map.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Minnesota-counties-map.png]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading images/media such as Image:California-gull.jpg to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading! Richard001 (talk) 06:26, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:SoA wallpaper 02 800.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SoA wallpaper 02 800.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Image:Indent-sample-dyk-firefox.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Indent-sample-dyk-firefox.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 16:28, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:NPH 2866542475 13a903bee8 o.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:NPH 2866542475 13a903bee8 o.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ebyabe (talk) 22:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Miroslav Sasek, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.miroslavsasek.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Proposed merger: 'Free state' back into 'Slave state' article
Hi Jengod,
I noticed that you were the original creator of the 'Free state' article, as a fork from the 'Slave state' page back in 2004. I'm not sure what you had planned for the split, but currently the 2 articles have a great deal of overlap, so I proposed merging them back together. I'm pretty new to WP, but am trying to follow all the tips at WP:MERGE. Would love to get your thoughts at the talk page
Thanks!--Cheakamus (talk) 20:14, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Blue Laws
I have nominated Blue Laws, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Laws. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Scott MacDonald (talk) 21:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC) Scott MacDonald (talk) 21:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Images from flickr
Hi,
When you upload images from flickr (like Image:2878688366 07f279c1be o.jpg and Image:NPH 2866542475 13a903bee8 o.jpg), please take care about the licence. There is not one Creative Commons Licence, but several. In particular, the CC 3.0 licenses cannot be used on Flick, only the 2.0 licences.
- Licence of Image:2878688366 07f279c1be o.jpg : CC-by-sa-2.0. See Image:Kevin Spacey - hbo post-emmys party.jpg on Wikimedia Commons.
- Licence of Image:NPH 2866542475 13a903bee8 o.jpg : CC-by-sa-2.0
Regards, Chphe (d) 13:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)