User talk:Blakegripling ph

---

Archives: 1 | 2

---

Welcome to my discussion page. I welcome all sorts of stuff here, rantings, criticisms, etc. But please obey the Wikipedia rules for user talk pages; I don't engage in an edit war or something, nor do I delight in vandalizing, OK?

Here are the rules for my talk page:

• If you start a new discussion here, I'll reply on your talk page or here.
• Please sign by adding ~~~~ at the end of your message when you post here.
• If you're here to complain about what I did, and you're new here to Wikipedia, please, read the rules first. It is likely that the reason why I reverted or revised your edits is either due to POV problems, vandalism or fanboyism. Asking me to allow you to continue POV-pushing or doing anything else that is contrary to the policy won't do anything good.
• Stay cool; flaming me or others won't do good either.

God Bless, and happy editing! Blake Gripling (talk) 10:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Regarding my forum...

Noted, I went to the host's forums and saw that as well. Thanks. RAM (talk) 05:40, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Response to your message at User talk:GO-PCHS-NJROTC

Please see my user talk page. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 19:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

URGENT!

This is about your abuse report. Can you compile a complete list of IP addresses used for the vandalism in that school range? It's best to report them all. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 15:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

So you're from the Phillipines? That's cool, that's where my father is from. I don't live with him though, I've raised by my mother and grandmother, who are white. I'm really hoping to get a reply today since the school that the vandals attend probably won't be open tomarrow. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 16:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

See my talk page for a response to your response. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 16:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Hatty_Jones.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hatty_Jones.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I've just replaced the GFDL license tag with a more appropriate one, so case closed... Blake Gripling (talk) 02:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Nokia 3110 Classic.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Nokia 3110 Classic.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Nokia 6230 dualsim.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Nokia 6230 dualsim.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Dual SIM adapter.JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Dual SIM adapter.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Copyright and replaceability

Hi, thanks for the message on the talk page. I should clarify a couple of things.

First, all images are copyrighted by default. When someone takes a photograph or writes a piece of music or draws a picture, that piece of work is copyrighted automatically. For other people to use it, the creator, has to license the image to another user, sell the copyright, or release the work to public domain. So you can't just take an image from the web and give it a GFDL or Creative Commons license - that right belongs to the copyright owner.

Second, replaceable means that a reasonable decent substitute can be created. So in the case of mobile phone components, it wouldn't be too much trouble for a Wikipedia editor to take a phone apart and take a picture. Sure, it probably won't be as pretty as a professional publicity shot, but it still gets the job done.

Anyway, let me now if you have any questions, but in the meantime, please follow the directions on the {{rfu}} tag and don't remove dispute tags from images. Thank you. --Mosmof (talk) 13:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

OK... God Bless and have a nice day... Blake Gripling (talk) 13:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Your recent report to WP:AIV

Hi, I removed your report of User:Lancestop to AIV, as it's not the same editing pattern written here. I'm familiar with Gonzalez though there's a high probability it would be better to pass by WP:SSP and then change the sock puppet page to include the Locsin edits. ^Khukri 09:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Mediation request

some fanatics(vandals) are doing nasty things in this page,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenshinhan can you help me??? --Saxnot (talk) 16:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Thank you my friend.How can i do that?I'm new here.God Bless and have a nice day.--Saxnot (talk) 09:39, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Saxnot

Thank you...

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Nice work on the fictional video games! :) GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 01:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Bitoy Album.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Bitoy Album.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bitoy Album.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bitoy Album.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:04, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Harassment

See my talk page. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 03:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Well

Please consider my edit.Okay? Because you feel taht you own this wikipedia Ivan Francis (talk) 07:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

NrDg

I won't revert your revert, but I noticed the problem, and decided that the best way for NrDg to notice DemiLovato15's misbehaviour was to leave it intact. It wasn't doing any particular harm, and it certainly makes it own point. Kww (talk) 00:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh... Sorry about that... Blake Gripling (talk) 01:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop assuming ownership

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Angel Locsin. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. 203.177.240.215 (talk) 03:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

See my reply at your talk page. Wikipedia is NOT a fan site! Blake Gripling (talk) 03:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry but I'm not convinced. You are really assuming that you own Angel Locsin and Strawberry Shortcake's articles. Sorry but you must not do it. We are here in Wikipedia to improve articles OK? 203.177.240.215 (talk) 03:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

I repeat I am NOT assuming ownership of articles! What you did to Angel's article, for the millionth time, is conflict of interest and unnecessary, and is reverted. I only did my job - you're the one who's disrupting... Blake Gripling (talk) 04:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Blakegripling, since the anon user is already blocked, I would advise to move on and ignore his/her comments. I see that you only reverted/edited edits that reeked of POV and you also did your best to clean up other articles. If this anon user still harasses you after the block is lifted, just report him/her to an admin so that the matter can be dealt with accordingly. Thanks. --- Tito Pao (talk) 04:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Just so you know, me and a few other Pinoy Wikipedians were also aware of that now-banned user you were mentioning. If you happen to encounter another (registered) account which might be a sockpuppet of this guy, do let me know so that I can take a look at the articles he has edited and clean them up. Thanks again ;-) --- Tito Pao (talk) 04:29, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Your RFA

Just a heads up; I have left you an addition optional question on your RFA. -IcewedgЁ (ťalķ) 05:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Good luck boy. --Efe (talk) 05:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello, you may possibly want to consider withdrawing your RfA. I am worried that the responses are getting uglier due to pile-ons and the way things are trending right now, passing this time around may be unlikely. I think the RfA has served its purpose in gauging the community's opinion of you becoming a syop at this time as well as pointing out a few things to work on for the next time around. Anyway, just a friendly suggestion.--Finalnight (talk) 07:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

See my reply on your talk page... Blake Gripling (talk) 08:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok, it is your choice of course. I have nothing against your RfA personally if you read my oppose reason. I was simply suggesting a withdraw to make sure you weren't hurt by some members who can be overzealous in their responses. Best of luck.--Finalnight (talk) 15:35, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I have closed your request for adminship as unsuccessful. At this point you should leave thank you notes for the people who expressed opinions. One thing that may help you pass next time is if you ask an experienced administrator to provide admin coaching. Your RFA page contains a much useful advice and I hope you will not be discouraged from seeking adminship in the future. Best regards, Jehochman ^Talk 14:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Angel Locsin.jpg

The image needs first a review from User:FlickreviewR soon to be well Licensed and doesn't need to be deleted as soon as possible. GoblinTech (talk) 08:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		Extreme Devotion Correctional Equipment
		I Award User:Blakegripling ph this "instrument" for keeping Philippine-related entertainment articles free from unnecessary trivia, unsupported information and very persistent socks--Lenticel (talk) 02:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

My Userpage

Dear Blakegripling ph, regarding on what you did to my userpage, it was change. You are suspecting me as a sockpuppet of Gerald Gonzalez why? Hello, I'm just a new wikipedian user here and this is my first account so please respect me, you are keep on bothering me, after you deleted the image ive uploaded now you are doing this to me again you ae keep on disturbing wikipedians! I Thought you were an excellent wikipedian, so please dont do things that you are not sure like this. Please, I want to clear to you aht I'm not Gerald Gonzalez! Cutie guyx22 (talk) 01:50, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Why?

I am not Gerald Gonzalez so the sock tag of my userpage must be removed as soon as possible. Cutie guyx22 (talk) 12:45, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Angel Locsin in ASAP

Hello the this image was not came from ABS-CBN. It was from my Camera Not from ABS-CBN Okay? so please stop bothering us. If you think that it was from ABS-CBN where's your source Mr.Blakegripling ph? Can I get If you have? Please be serious man. Cutie guyx22 (talk) 09:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

See my reply in your talk page. Blake Gripling (talk) 09:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I dont think so, I take the image during the rehearsal of ASAP 08 right, ABS-CBN Management is not important because I am the uploader of the image not them, It is capable for GNU Free Documentation License as soon as it was not copied from other websites. Blakegripling ph can you please respect wikipedian users here, your such an unrespect wikipedian. I dont think if you studied in your school in learning GMRC, Maybe not because its really obvious on your behaviour. Cutie guyx22 (talk) 09:50, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Gerald Gonzalez

Good to see a knowledgable opinion on that one. Seems like you know this one better than I do. Thanks for backing me up. Daniel Case (talk) 09:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Matthew 8965

i deleted you page for a minute so i coud get the right protecshon you need becus some people vaderlize the sights —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew 8965 (talk • contribs) 09:38, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Friendster Screenshot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Friendster Screenshot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Your edits on Angel Locsin

Please do not remove references as you did to Angel Locsin it was changed. It was considered as vandalism.

Please review first the following:

• Wikipedia:Verifiability that states that an statements on an article must be attributed to a reliable, published source; meaning don't remove the references.
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers#Filmography that states that the filmography must be chronological and this applies to all actors and filmmakers (including Filipino actors).ZMaxim (talk) 04:39, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

This is your second warning,Do not Removed references on Angel Locsin.ZMaxim (talk) 05:08, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

You act like a sock, and you are. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:14, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

That's cute. That same message above is the one I posted over Loverboyz's talk page. Sure these two accounts are controlled by the same person. --bluemask ^(talk) 05:30, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your edits on Angel Locsin

"I deleted your revisions to the article, simply because it was biased, and was more or less inclined to giving praise to Angel. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)"

Your wrong my dear, it was not praised it was talking about ratings, read this!

In January 28, 2008, Locsin launched her first teleserye in ABS-CBN entitled Lobo where she was paired to Piolo Pascual. The show premiered on January 28, 2008 with a rating of 27.7%. This registered a higher pilot reception compared to Palos and Kung Fu Kids in Mega Manila ratings. The cast of Lobo was ecstatic with the warm reception from viewers to their pilot episode, especially Angel whose transfer to ABS-CBN was considered very controversial. Eventually, in the end of the series, it got the highest rating of 33.4% (compared to its on-screen rival Dyesebel (aired on GMA 7, top-billed by Locsin's so-called rival Marian Rivera) which only garnered 33.2% in the nationwide ratings game conducted by NUTAM Ratings. However, It is currently the most expensive teleserye made by ABS-CBN. The series ended on July 11, 2008. ---Every sentence has a references, so it must be consider as a minor edit You only misinterpret my edit.ZMaxim (talk) 06:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Please Stop

Can you please stop removing references in Angel Locsin, we're not a young boy playing in an article, you already know that removing references isn't an essence of a wikipedian, but a crazy wikipedian so please stop doing it, or else i will report you to an administrator here in wiki. Flicrz (talk) 06:35, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Please be discipline enough, ok! Flicrz (talk) 07:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Angel Locsin

Here are the links to prove that Land Down Under is Angel Locsin's movie with Piolo Pascual so you wont remove some references in the article of Angel Locsin [1], [2] at ito pa [3]. Thankyou! Flicrz (talk) 07:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Please stop Vandalizing

Please stop vandalizing Angel Locsin, I will report you to an Admin here so you will be blocked. WRCurtis (talk) 08:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Question

Hi Blake, as you know Aiza00 uses 203.177.x.x and 222.127.x.x. You said on NrDg's talk page that it's the same range you use. I've previously narrowed the block between 222.127.26.0 to 222.127.26.255 based on Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gerald Gonzalez and it seemed to be effective until recently, so I'll see if a hardblock is effective. Does your IP fall within there? Spellcast (talk) 09:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok thanks, I'll try hardblocking then. Spellcast (talk) 10:50, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: User:Wuqiqiang and other spammers

It looks like A. B. (talk · contribs) has these cross-wiki spammers under control. If the spamming persists, it'll be added to the blacklist. Spellcast (talk) 07:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the correction...

Pardon my bad grammar (Australia/Australian in the Mitsubishi_L300 page) & thanks for the correction! OzWalkerz (talk) 11:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Regarding what you did...

Not a problem. Cheers. --AussieLegend (talk) 12:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Reply to: Notability of Lira Luis

I can give you numerous references to the notability of architect Lira Luis. I created this article as a fan of architecture. I used this username as the name of the article because it is the most logical and easiest name to remember. If you do a search on "Lira Luis" from the Yahoo! search engine, you will see a lot of articles written about Ms Luis, and NOT BY Ms Luis. I think the original article I wrote about her was unfairly reported and deleted. It appears as a blatant sabotage against a person by a group who appears to be very jealous of the success of Ms Luis. The persons in question are: Blakegripling ph, who conspired to taint the reputation of Ms Luis. Please read these articles that will justify the notability of the achievements of Ms Luis:

http://www.metropolismag.com/cda/story.php?artid=1150 http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1023770461.html http://damnedinblue.blogspot.com/2006/04/architect-lira-luis-and-immortal.html http://www.aiany.org/firms/firm.php?id=1001563 http://archrecord.construction.com/archrecord2/live/OnTheSide/bowwowhaus.asp http://www.target.com/gp/detail.html/602-2332920-3398253?asin=1424300479&afid=yahoosspplp_bmvd&lnm=1424300479%7CFRANKly_Speaking:_It%27s_the_WRIGHT_Way_:_Books&ref=tgt_adv_XSNG1060 http://archrecord.construction.com/archrecord2/work/0502/pod.asp http://www.metropolismag.com/cda/story.php?artid=1051 http://www.planetizen.com/node/14990 http://globalnation.inquirer.net/ofwspotlight/ofwspotlight/view_article.php?article_id=26967 http://goodnewspilipinas.com/wp/?p=865 http://aec.cadalyst.com/aec/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=429618 http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/questex/cadalyst0607/index.php?startid=14 http://aec.cadalyst.com/aec/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=437990&ref=25 www.midglen.com/newsletter/volume9.pdf http://www.jurgita.com/models-id218134.html Liraluis (talk) 02:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Eloise

Re your message: Semi-protection has been tried before and he just returns at a later time or changes focus. I think we have him fairly controlled though. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:37, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Controversy Section

Hi, I thought you might be interested in the issue of controversy section to all Filipino actors' and actresses' articles. The said discussion is to have coherence on all the said articles whether they should have a controversy section or the information be merged into other sections of the articles to achieve a more neutral presentation. If you are interested kindly visit User talk:Shoowak. Thanks! Axxand (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Your notifications

HI Blake. I read your comments here User_talk:Geniusdream#Your_edits_to_Sarah_Geronimo. I think the editor needs mentoring. --Efe (talk) 05:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Exactly. I hope we'll get response from him anytime soon. The FA nomination is going to be killed. --Efe (talk) 05:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

TAMBAY knew of this already. --Efe (talk) 05:57, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

From GeniusDream

Sir, the edits I did with Sarah Geronimo has references, I can revise some of its details to be formal and comprehensive. I will also delete some of the unnecessary photos there. I'll work on it as soon as possible. Please give me time, so that I can re-edit properly.

Give me a deadline, and I'll work on it, and try to check on the article by then and inform me if it is still biased. Thank You. --Geniusdream (talk) 09:12, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

From Genius Dream

I've finished re-editing the article, and if there are still biased portions, please inform me.

--Geniusdream (talk) 10:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

From Genius Dream

I'm still surfing and researching for references and sources, and I hope that I can finish it soon.

--Geniusdream (talk) 10:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Computing RD

Your recent edit at the Computing RD seems to have overwritten a bunch of other edits. Just letting you know in case you want to clear this up. Gandalf61 (talk) 11:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Too late - looks like someone fixed it for you. Gandalf61 (talk) 12:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

From --Geniusdream (talk) 02:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Sarah Geronimo, you will be blocked from editing.

You are continuously blanking the article, Sarah Geronimo without carefully reading the page. You are carelessly removing contents which are necessary and informative.

--Geniusdream (talk) 02:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

From --Geniusdream (talk) 02:59, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I've made a new version of the article but it seems that you are still undoing the edits. I removed the biased words and sentences in the page as you said so, look and check for it. Moreover, I'm not yet done about looking for the references, to prove the contents of Sarah Geronimo.

From --Geniusdream (talk) 03:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

The introduction is long, but when you look at other articles in Wikipedia, they are even longer. I think that the length of the intro doesn't matter at all, as long as it is factual.

The issue about the occupation as an endorser, I will remove it.

--Geniusdream (talk) 03:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

From --Geniusdream (talk) 03:14, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

As I see it, maybe you might be overwhelmed of how the article was presented. Mainly because the words used are very persuasive, and I think that is the profound point, to make each and every article in Wikipedia, interesting to read for the young ones.

From --Geniusdream (talk) 03:19, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm re-editing it now, and I'll be finish maybe about 2-3 days, to find also the references.

--Geniusdream (talk) 03:19, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

From --Geniusdream (talk) 04:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I am now placing the references, look at it, but I'm not yet finished.

--Geniusdream (talk) 04:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Good Day Sir

I Think its not fair if you will not consider my constribution, I only added important informations about her, like that her Movie's opening is on Nov.25 not Nov.12 and if im wrong theres nothing wrong on it. I am right? Backmeupof2 (talk) 05:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Some images that are in need of being speedied...

Re your message: The images are scheduled for deletion in a few days. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Geniusdream

Think there's any chance that the IP isn't Geniusdream evading his block?—Kww(talk) 01:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

from --Geniusdream (talk) 07:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

As I've read on one of the guidelines here in wikipedia, it is said that there are no limitations in putting details on an article as long as it has references, furthermore your last revision has no references. Please present me references that says that these details aren't true.

--Geniusdream (talk) 07:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Genuisdream

Can we request him to be blocked into an Admin, He keeps on overflowing the details and infos of Sarah Geronimo without having valid sources. Look at his edits so crazy. Wynchard Bloom (talk) 09:03, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

He again repeatedly do it right now, Geniusdream is so stubbord. Can you block him indefenetely. Wynchard Bloom (talk) 11:14, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

--Geniusdream (talk) 11:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

The current version of Sarah Geronimo, has already have the references to validate the contents, why do you keep reverting it back to the version which has no references at all. --Geniusdream (talk) 11:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)