User talk:Luk: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 04:13, 6 December 2008

AF • HQ • RFU
AIV • ANI • AN

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Click here to leave me a new message .
I will usually reply on your talk page if you sign your comments by typing ~~~~ at the end.

If you are here because you think I've made a mistake somewhere, you might be right.

If you can, please undo my action (even if it's a deletion or a block) and notify me, I'll double check later.

	Archives
2006 – 2007 – 2008 – 2009
2010 – 2011 – 2012 – 2013–2017
2018 – 2019 – 2020 – 2021

A template I made.

My alternate account (NOT A SOCKPUPPET, PUT UP ALT. ACCOUNT NOTICE) recently made a template (like the {{repeat vandal}} template). I was wondering if you could:

a) Tell other admins and have them spread the word
b) Start using it
c) Protect it so that only I and the admins can edit it.

Thanks, --Encyclopedia77 (talk) 22:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very stupid question: Errr, which template? :D However I do think that {{repeat vandal}} is a bad template, it is useless (if it's a user it'll be blocked indef shortly anyway, if it's a shared IP this is not welcoming to the innocent users there). I don't think any admin really considers this template before blocking. -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:09, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's {{VandalNoticeSmall}}, which is rather ironic because, based on this user's recent edit history, there's a good chance it could end up on his/her talk page. Regarding {{repeat vandal}}, I was under the impression that this was meant more of a warning to the user whose page it was on, rather than as information for administrators. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:02, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is VandalNoticeSmall. Sorry. Lost my brain.

checkuser

Thank you. Cheers 65.31.103.28 (talk) 17:28, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my apologies... i was meaning to change it correctly when i left my computer and somebody decided to have some fun. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.138.92 (talk) 18:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WHACK!!

Plip!

--Encyclopedia77 Talk 22:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

?? -- lucasbfr ^talk 22:14, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol --Encyclopedia77 Talk 23:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JOSE1.jpg

Hi, about a month ago I had asked about how to get the licensing cleared on this image. You mentioned that you can monitor the permissions emailbox, so if I could ask you to keep an eye out over the next couple of days (if you have time of course) for an email relating to the image? I believe the email will be coming from the address "Nycth at aol dot com" but whatever the address the subject header should include the filename. If you don't have time please don't worry about it. Thanks either way! Otto4711 (talk) 01:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing yet, I'll check again in a few days. -- lucasbfr ^talk 07:50, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I checked again, still no luck. -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:41, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Page

I was wondering if you could get me the text from the deleted pages http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Masters_%28Group%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_Plan. I made them as a joke to my friend a while back and we were talking about them and wondering what I had written. Thanks.-SaigonTheDon ^Talk

Unblock my account please

Could you please unblock my account User:sv23. I understand that I vandalized and received repeated warnings. However, it has been almost a month and I want my account back. I will edit responsibly on Wikipedia henceforth and will not ask for any additional chances. My user page has been protected also. I request you to unprotect the page as well. Again, I agree that my edits were unconstructive and I simply ask for another chance.

Hi, just to say I have seen your message. I'll think over it and try to reply later today. -- lucasbfr ^talk 09:33, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, sorry for the late reply. In all honesty if that was your first block I would have unblocked you without much thoughts. I see however that you were already unblocked once and promised to behave yourself. We misplaced our trust once and I'm not a big fan of third chances. I suggest you create a new account and start again from scratch with a clean record. -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:37, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who

I didn't even visit that page, never mind delete any content of the pages. Get your facts right before you start accusing me of deleting other people's pages! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.215.88 (talk • contribs)

Thanks Fuhghettaboutit for the reply :) I have added my 2 cents even if they'll probably never see it :(. -- lucasbfr ^talk 09:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime and yeah, it'll probably go unseen. Dem's the breaks when dealing with IPs who don't know they're dynamic.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 66

Hey! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 66: Searching High and Low has been released. You can listen and comment at the episode's page and, as always, listen to all of the past episodes at wikipediaweekly.org. WODUPbot 07:54, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

Nice Template!

Thank you for creating that descriptive template. I did leave a message regarding the account creation request tool but your template is quite helpful in the heat of this situation. Thanks again.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Np :) I hope this gets fixed soon :S. I tweaked it a bit to redirect users to the unblock mailing list but I fear it's gonna get overwhelmed. -- lucasbfr ^talk 17:18, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah its a pretty ugly pickle right now >.<...I still think appending a link to requesting an account wouldn't hurt though. The unblock list is primarily for an unblocking after all. (Off topic: How'd you manage to conjure up that nice little preview message you wizard of wikicoding?!)¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:25, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shoot nevermind:

Also, the ACC does not work for IP addresses currently blocked on Wikipedia. Users should be directed to email accounts-enwiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org to request an account. 4I7.4I7 17:11, 5 December 2008 (UTC) ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:34, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock please

Hi, my IP address 62.30.249.131 has been blocked by you due to vandalism. Additionally, when trying to make a new login(I am currently changing emails and nicknames), i am told i cant because "6 accounts have been made by this IP in the last 24 hrs". I haven't used my IP for the last 24hrs, no one has!!!

Please could you unblock this???

Eladkse61 (talk) 19:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, we are aware of this issue. Unfortunately, due to an internal bug we had to disable editing from a part of the UK. We are working very hard in order to resolve this issue. -- lucasbfr ^talk 21:43, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

62.30.249.131

are you aware you've blocked the majority of Virgin Media customers in the UK? several million people? that this block has had to be undone several times today alone? how about blocking 82.148.97.69 next time, genius! Jw2034 (talk) 00:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey man uncool don't do me like that, think you are some hot shot take a look at the man and then you will see!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.4.140.156 (talk) 04:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not do me like that

get a life bro editing the edits of other people do your research find a picture of the guy and you will see!!! You are a meanie and inconsiderate you should check your attitude Due you hug your mother with the arms that you use to hurt peoples internet dreams. It is unfortunate how you flaunt that previous vandalism on your page. It is embarrassing not only to the man who wrote but to you as well, it reflects poorly on your character. What is the smell? Oh it is just the lingering odor of your blatant disregard for others feeling. Low blow dude could have even been hard enough for a gelatinous ball. JK man keep up the good work. It takes a spacial someone to edit an edit you must feel one step above those who try to make a difference in the world. Get of your high horse and get the stick out of your bung hole and just chillax But seriously JK good work i admire it seriously Wikipedia is a useful tool and upkeep is important especially with all the crazys out there. Wikipedia has been an invaluable tool in my life for the betterment of my general knowledge your contributions are well noted and appreciated thanks for the hard and dedicated work. Please keep it up.