User talk:Damiens.rf

This talk page is not a battle ground

Please, stay cool.

Image listed for deletion

In reply to your listing the image Image:Johan Helsingius.jpg for deletion: the original copyright message has been added with an added explanation on the copyright status. Please also see the comment on the Images and media for deletion page.

This should satisfy the standing guidelines, please un-list the image for deletion.

review

please review the article V (programming language)

Sourced Content Removal Warning

Please refrain from making bogus edit sumaries on the removal of sourced content as you did on Eye Color your reason has no validity, please do not remove photo again it could be considered vandalism if done again thank you--Wikiscribe (talk) 00:55, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

We don't use copyrighted non-free images to illustrate simple concepts as "green-eyes". You'll have to use a free picture for that. --Damiens.rf 02:14, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Please point out the wiki policy portal and i will be satisfied and will leave it out of the eye color artcle but sorry i can't just take your word for it you understand right--Wikiscribe (talk) 04:13, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

The policy covering the use of non-free pictures is Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, and the relevant item is the first one, "No free equivalent". We can't use a non-free image to illustrate "green eyes" because a frees images showing green eyes can be found or created. --Damiens.rf 14:31, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

okay great that is settled but just in the future damiens.rf when citing removal of something from an article via policy, just port the wiki policy within the summary edit,so this kind of minor snafu can be avoided.--Wikiscribe (talk) 15:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

ok. Will do that. --Damiens.rf 22:11, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Just a short friendly reminder (in case you forgot) about a question that I asked you on Talk:Che Guevara (photo)#Quote issue. Thanks and take your time.   Redthoreau (talk)RT 00:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Talkpages aren't battlegrounds hey?

Your two faces are clearly showing. Your behaviour has already landed you in hot water in the past, reverting someone's own userpage edit is NOT on by any stretch. Timeshift (talk) 22:46, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

User's don't own their talk page (yes, that was not a user page). --Damiens.rf 22:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Um, yes they do, and you know that. Timeshift (talk) 23:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

STOP TROLLING THIS PAGE !!!!

Now that I have your attention.....three out of the four changes you made to that article have been reverted because they're bullshit changes. I've warned you before about trolling on that page, try it again and I'll push for a topic ban.
You tagged for sources where sources already existed at least three times. (All have been reverted) The only change left standing is the change you made to the lead sentance regarding Dwight Lauderdale's LASIK surgery. I don't have any reason to change it, I think it sucks, of course, but I have no grounds to change it because I think it sucks. Bottom line, stay off the Dwight Lauderdale page, because you contribute nothing to the project! KoshVorlon > rm -r WP:F.U.R 13:07, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Images

Re. History of painting and Western painting: this issue is acknowledged and being addressed in these and other articles, initially Color Field. See article talk page and also discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts. Participation is welcome to work through the text and images properly. Ty 13:14, 24 December 2008 (UTC)