Jump to content

User talk:EncMstr: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Rabbler - "Objection to MD5 reject"
Rabbler (talk | contribs)
Line 111: Line 111:
I submitted an external link to the MD5 page and was promptly removed and then you made the remark that it is an inappropriate external link and possibly considered vandalism. I beg to differ. What I offered was a service that does online MD5, SHA, CRC, and most popular algorithms you can think of, for BIG FILES. I don't know of any other online services that can do that. Let's say you still consider this free service inappropriate... then how come other external links such as the one linked to http://hash-it.net considered appropriate when it is doing much less? Millions of people downloaded and installed free-or-paid checksum programs (often at the risk of getting bogus ones and infecting their computers), when they can use an online service which was not the first of its kind. How is this considered inappropriate?
I submitted an external link to the MD5 page and was promptly removed and then you made the remark that it is an inappropriate external link and possibly considered vandalism. I beg to differ. What I offered was a service that does online MD5, SHA, CRC, and most popular algorithms you can think of, for BIG FILES. I don't know of any other online services that can do that. Let's say you still consider this free service inappropriate... then how come other external links such as the one linked to http://hash-it.net considered appropriate when it is doing much less? Millions of people downloaded and installed free-or-paid checksum programs (often at the risk of getting bogus ones and infecting their computers), when they can use an online service which was not the first of its kind. How is this considered inappropriate?


At the end of the day there may be nothing I can do, due to the way Wikipedia editorial works, but let me state my objection anyway. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rabbler|Rabbler]] ([[User talk:Rabbler|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rabbler|contribs]]) 23:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
At the end of the day there may be nothing I can do, due to the way Wikipedia editorial works, but let me state my objection anyway. [[User:Rabbler|Rabbler]] ([[User talk:Rabbler|talk]]) 23:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rabbler|Rabbler]] ([[User talk:Rabbler|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rabbler|contribs]]) 23:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


{{Talkback|Versus22}}
{{Talkback|Versus22}}

Revision as of 23:38, 13 February 2009

My admin actions
ContribsBlocksProtectsDeletions
Admin links
NoticeboardIncidentsAIV3RR
BacklogProdAfDAutoblocks
Arbitration
ArbitrationNoticeboardEnforcement
Checkuser
RFCUClerks pageCheckuser
Abusive HostsVCN proxycheckippages
Multi-RBL lookupDNSstuff
Wannabe Kate's toolPrefix index

Section order

Nice to meet you. And, sorry for my late response. Thank you for your correction. Yes, I need some correct modifications and opinions.--Cuaxdon (talk) 08:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A question

First of all thanks for the helpful template in welcoming me to Wikipedia! I had a problem with the "Nicole Brown Simpson" page, as I listed citations using the normal Wikipedia mechanics, but the page now says "Cite Error" at the bottom and I do not know why.Jonnyhottrod (talk) 06:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Jonnyhottrod The Guidance Barnstar[reply]

The Guidance Barnstar
You fixed it! For that you deserve this barnstar.Jonnyhottrod (talk) 06:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Jonnyhottrod[reply]

Museums & Prisons COTW

Howdy to all those in WikiProject Oregon land! To start, thanks to those who helped improve Grattan Kerans and Oregon and California Railroad as part of the Collaboration of the Week. This week we’ll try and start some new articles with a red link elimination drive on a couple of Oregon lists. So, you have your pick of prisons, or museums. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PCH

Thank you for your support. Things should be OK as long as the page stays protected. I've taken the page off my watch list for the time being, just to reign in my annoyance with that character. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 04:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


fallout from Rooster Rock

Baseball Bugs I believe I am that character that you refer to above. Sorry i am not one of the "good ol'e boys club" here, but I really feel that you should be more careful of your edits as well as not take action when you have no knowledge of a topic, and feel compelled to edit it. The only reason that you are annoyed with me is because you removed FACT from a page, because it did not conform to your preferences, whether religious, or otherwise. BTW you Posted about your religious beliefs on wikipedia therefore it IS open for discussion. If it is not open for discussion, you should not post it!

EncMstr I see no issue with using caps for emphasis and I commented so on that users page where I believed to be appropriate, I will not tolerate being belittled here because I am an unknown. I use caps for EMPHASIS, that is different from ALL Caps as I posted to the appropriate user! Had thee preceding user on this page, not made the edits (that he obviously knew nothing about) I would not be in a position to have to defend them at all, and they would not find me an annoyance. It is that user that someone should get after, not me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markosjal (talkcontribs) 07:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC) BTW if you keep getting after folks who make GENUINE CONTRIBUTIONS, Wikipedia looses its value. It becomes nothing more than your personal mouthpiece07:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"move GeoGroupTemplate to top so it acts as surrogate article coordinate"?

Hi. You recently did this edit to National Register of Historic Places listings in Southwest Portland, Oregon. Your edit summary was "move GeoGroupTemplate to top so it acts as surrogate article coordinate". But I still don't follow the purpose of the edit. It's probably just my lack of understanding of the GeoGroupTemplate, so can you explain what you mean by "surrogate article coordinate" in a bit more depth? Thanks! —Ipoellet (talk) 16:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My comment should have said move GeoGroupTemplate to top so it acts as surrogate article title coordinate. A title coordinate appears at the top right of geolocated articles (for most users—depending on skin), so users expect to be able to produce a map, etc. for an article by clicking on something at the top right. Moving {{GeoGroupTemplate}} to the top makes Map of all coordinates appear almost in the same place, meeting most "geoexpectations". —EncMstr (talk) 18:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Taiga

Your welcome! I have corrected the spelling. In future (if possible), try to be bold and fix te error yourself. Regards, FM talk to me | show contributions ]  17:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks. Keep up the good work. —EncMstr (talk) 18:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RTOS "examples"

Hello EncMstr, the examples are growing again, the anonymous user seems to be connected to the vendor looking at the log. I reverted a small vandalism but this one is work for you.

Thank You —Preceding unsigned comment added by N'SallaNuto (talkcontribs) 20:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:French laundry l'addition.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:French laundry l'addition.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGatalk 07:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting 5 articles which were deleted

I notice that you are listed on: Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles.

I am requesting 5 deleted articles to be userfied, pretty, pretty please :):

From: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 November 15

If I could please also get the creator's name and date it was created?

You can move all 5 pages to a userspace, lets say User:Ikip/Heaven Or Hell, with the history intact (I am interested in who created the article, and when).

I really appreciate it. You are probably wondering why I ask. Well, I have spent my weekend on a graph found here: User:Ikip/AfD on average day. I am interested in what type of user gets their page deleted, etc....November 15 is just a day pulled out of a hat by another user.

Thanks :) Ikip (talk) 17:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done
They are at User:Ikip/Heaven Or Hell, User:Ikip/Darren Sadler, User:Ikip/FPSBanana, User:Ikip/Halfway House (music venue), and User:Ikip/NASCO Properties. The last is unusual because a redirect was added after the article was deleted. I'm still trying to fix that part. —EncMstr (talk) 23:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Helping Hand Barnstar
The Helping Hand Barnstar is to be awarded to users who frequently help new users.

This barnstar is awarded to EncMstr, for his wonderful assistance in helping in my research to understand AfDs, which will greatly assist future new users. EncMstr, Thank you so much for your eagerness to help the project, you are a fine administrator. Ikip (talk) 19:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MD5

I submitted an external link to the MD5 page and was promptly removed and then you made the remark that it is an inappropriate external link and possibly considered vandalism. I beg to differ. What I offered was a service that does online MD5, SHA, CRC, and most popular algorithms you can think of, for BIG FILES. I don't know of any other online services that can do that. Let's say you still consider this free service inappropriate... then how come other external links such as the one linked to http://hash-it.net considered appropriate when it is doing much less? Millions of people downloaded and installed free-or-paid checksum programs (often at the risk of getting bogus ones and infecting their computers), when they can use an online service which was not the first of its kind. How is this considered inappropriate?

At the end of the day there may be nothing I can do, due to the way Wikipedia editorial works, but let me state my objection anyway. Rabbler (talk) 23:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabbler (talkcontribs) 23:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EncMstr. You have new messages at Versus22's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.