Talk:Rosalie Abella: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:57, 24 February 2009

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Canada: Law Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 19:21, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

The Controversy section seems to be more about someone disagreeing with a decision in which RA took part than a genuine controversy. SCC justices make hundreds of decisions each year, all of which are controversial in the sense that they are all contested. And someone wins and someone loses. The articles would get pretty big if each decision of the Court were to be listed. I think I'll remove the section in a few days if someone can't come up with a good reason that this particular case is "especially" controversial. --24.68.252.200 (talk) 07:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done 24.68.252.200 (talk) 11:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 07:51, 22 February 2009 edit 24.68.252.200 (talk) →‎Controversy: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:57, 24 February 2009 edit undo 24.68.252.200 (talk) →‎Controversy Next edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:

	The Controversy section seems to be more about someone disagreeing with a decision in which RA took part than a genuine controversy. SCC justices make hundreds of decisions each year, all of which are controversial in the sense that they are all contested. And someone wins and someone loses. The articles would get pretty big if each decision of the Court were to be listed. I think I'll remove the section in a few days if someone can't come up with a good reason that this particular case is "especially" controversial. --[[Special:Contributions/24.68.252.200\|24.68.252.200]] ([[User talk:24.68.252.200\|talk]]) 07:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)		The Controversy section seems to be more about someone disagreeing with a decision in which RA took part than a genuine controversy. SCC justices make hundreds of decisions each year, all of which are controversial in the sense that they are all contested. And someone wins and someone loses. The articles would get pretty big if each decision of the Court were to be listed. I think I'll remove the section in a few days if someone can't come up with a good reason that this particular case is "especially" controversial. --[[Special:Contributions/24.68.252.200\|24.68.252.200]] ([[User talk:24.68.252.200\|talk]]) 07:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

			Done [[Special:Contributions/24.68.252.200\|24.68.252.200]] ([[User talk:24.68.252.200\|talk]]) 11:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)