Jump to content

User talk:Scjessey: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Civility: I completely agree. Continued outbursts like this will get you blocked. ~~~~
No edit summary
Line 62: Line 62:


{{#if:|[[User:{{{2}}}]] has|I have}} nominated [[Barack Obama]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Barack Obama|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]]. -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] ([[User talk:Avraham|talk]]) 20:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
{{#if:|[[User:{{{2}}}]] has|I have}} nominated [[Barack Obama]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Barack Obama|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]]. -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] ([[User talk:Avraham|talk]]) 20:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

{{talkback|ChildofMidnight}}

==Civility==
Referring to editors whose views you disagree with as "batshit insane fringetards (and the poor sheep that follow them)," is clearly inappropriate and violates our civility guidelines and is especially unhelpful where an article is on probation and in the midst of a dispute. Please remove or refactor your comment and refrain from making personal attacks in the future. Thanks. [[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 16:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
:I completely agree. Continued outbursts like this will get you blocked. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 16:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:22, 12 March 2009

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A descriptive header==. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions. Please note this is not a forum for discussing the topic generally.

Talk page guidelines

Please respect etiquette and assume good faith. Also be nice and remain civil.

Blocked for 3RR

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Nothing personal — consider this a short shock from the proverbial electric fence. Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 23:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quartermaster chiming in on Obama article and Rezko edits (as well as other stuff)

You come across as an exquisitely honest editor regarding the Obama article. You're a good shepherd. I will tread lightly per your suggestions. Have a barnstar.

The Anti-Flame Barnstar
Thanks, Mom! Quartermaster (talk) 20:06, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I'm not seeing edit warring at the article, and I believe this was a simple mistake after reviewing the contribution history of Scjessey and the filer of the original 3RR report. Wikidemon CENSEI is not completely innocent in this whole matter, and these type of reports and tenacious/gaming editing practices is becoming tiring. That said, I don't think that ceasing editing at Barack Obama is necessary, but please be aware of the sanctions that are in existence and save wholesale reverts for blatant vandalism. Cheers, seicer | talk | contribs 04:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: seicer | talk | contribs 04:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a note directly with the blocking editor suggesting that the block is a mistake and that the editing in question was routine, uncontroversial article patrol. The 3RR report itself is an over-the-top act of wikigaming by a problem editor. Wikidemon (talk) 00:06, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Scjessey, as peculiar as this is, to eliminate any possible argument for the ongoing block will you kindly signal that you will not do more than 3 reverts per day on the main page, even unrelated uncontroversial ones, until and unless we clarify per the terms of article probation that this is okay? Thanks, Wikidemon (talk) 01:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've been away from Wikipedia for a few hours, and this block has come as a complete surprise to me. I agree that this is a highly dubious piece of wikigaming, and this is clearly confirmed by the reporting editor's attempt to ensure the block remains - an agenda-based 3RR report, basically. Oh well. No real harm done. -- Scjessey (talk) 01:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re unblocked

I'm glad you got unblocked. I'm sorry you experienced problems with an autoblock. I hope that my comments, with perhaps an overly-strict interpretation of 3RR enforcement, didn't have too much adverse effect on your ability to edit freely. Coppertwig (talk) 02:38, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

African-American hyphen

Fair enough, but can we make the Obama article consistent? Newguy34 (talk) 00:49, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I responded at my talk page. Newguy34 (talk) 01:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Penn

Thanks for your revert on this. I'm afraid this is going to develop into a problem. Wildhartlivie (talk) 20:29, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obama political positions

I'm the one who wrote the article you deleted. So, LifeNews is not a reliable source? When I said some have criticized him, I meant some in the pro-life movement. I directly referenced the criticism. How is that not "reliable"? NYyankees51 (talk) 17:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama FAR

I have nominated Barack Obama for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Avi (talk) 20:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]