Jump to content

User talk:AnmaFinotera: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnmaFinotera (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 281375761 by Proxy User (talk) rv; while pointing, go read WP:USER
Proxy User (talk | contribs)
Line 227: Line 227:


Very well then, i'll go and search for it. though the promotional image isn't that good either.[[User:Haseo445|<font color="Purple">Death</font><font color="Indigo">Berry</font>]] [[User talk:DeathBerry|<font color="Indigo">talk</font>]] 17:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Very well then, i'll go and search for it. though the promotional image isn't that good either.[[User:Haseo445|<font color="Purple">Death</font><font color="Indigo">Berry</font>]] [[User talk:DeathBerry|<font color="Indigo">talk</font>]] 17:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
==Proxy USer==
I don't think you are in a position to say the things to me that you did. The comments I have made DO NOT rise to the level that would result in any type of putative action, and your comments on my page constitute harassment. If you continue to harass me and modify my legitimate comments on article pages, I *WILL* make a formal complaint against you. [[User:Proxy User|Proxy User]] ([[User talk:Proxy User|talk]])

Revision as of 21:59, 2 April 2009

User:Collectonian/talkheader

Wassup

What's new with you? I just got engaged! Yippe! *joking* And I'm 12 years old! *joking* Some new manga I got include 5 Raijin Comics issues and the first volume of City Hunter, both rare. – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 16:37, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing much. Got some more unpacking done (finally), overhauled/organized my bathroom at last (yay), and tried to destress during my spring break. Ended up doing weird Wiki editing :P -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No seriously, I just got engaged. (the *joking* thing was reffering to the 12-year old thingy) What was the weird Wiki editing? – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 22:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, cool, congrats. :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You get any new manga? – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 16:09, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In general? I bought 41 new volumes last month, seven have arrived this month. If you mean new series, I started reading Hell Girl. BookCloseOuts.com put all their manga on sale for 99 cents, so I picked up the first volume of Pearl Pink and the first five volumes of Ultra Cute (along with vol 8, they didn't have 6 * 7), and vols 2 & 3 of Platinum Garden (got vol 1 ages ago). They are still in route, though, along with the latest volume of Fruits Basket. :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I just got JP volumes 1 & 2 of Bakuman and 2 & 3 of Tegami Bachi. Tegami Bachi has the most amazing artwork ever! It makes me so mad that stupid ol' Viz had to go and replace all the Japanese FX with goofy typefaces and edit out the *gasp!* D-word! Well, Bakuman also has really good artwork. :) – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 16:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Eh? Another Furuba has been released? *goes to check chapter list* EDIT: Woohoo, so it has! And RPLS already has a copy! *requests* =D ダイノガイ?!」(Dinoguy1000) 18:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yep...now just have to wait till July for the final volume. Both a sad and an exciting thought. Have you tried her new series,Phantom Dream? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Aah, yes, the love/hate melancholy of a series finale... ='( I believe I've read the first chapter of Phantom Dream, and I have volume 1 requested, but it's still in cataloging. ダイノガイ?!」(Dinoguy1000) 19:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think I read the first chapter two (didn't it preview in Shojo Beat?) Man your library gets stuff relatively quick :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I can't relate to anything you're saying now! :D *nose bleed* – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 21:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
LOL. Hey, least we aren't talking yaoi :P -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If I recall correctly, I read the first chapter when it was previewed in a different manga volume (though what volume that was, I've forgotten completely... maybe Forbidden Dance 1? hmm...). I've read a few issues of SB (someone's been donating back issues to my library! ^_^ ), but that's definitely not where I read the preview. It's not my library getting Phantom Dream 1, but another one in the Rolling Prairie Library System (RPLS), which includes several dozen school, academic, and public libraries throughout central Illinois. I'd still have to agree, though, that *was* pretty fast... most of the time when an RPLS library gets a volume so soon after release (or preorders it), it's a big-name series like Naruto or One Piece. As for yaoi... I'm not so sure about the serious stuff (Descendants of Darkness was absolute torture when I watched it on Ani-Monday, but that could be more because of bad voice acting and a rather stupid (or at least poorly executed) plotline IMHO), but I love the comical yaoi in some series (like the twins from Ouran XD ). BTW, Collectonian, you need to get the semiprotection removed from your talkpage so I can reply from home without having to log in on my ancient behemoth! ;) ダイノガイ?!」(Dinoguy1000) 05:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It couldn't have been Forbidden Dance as that one was released ages ago and I think is now out of print :) ROFLOL at Descendants of Darkness cause yeah, that voice acting was so hideous I couldn't even watch one whole episode. For the semi-protection, I'd put in a request but I guess I messed it up because I just discovered my user page's semi-protection was removed instead of my talk page. Asked the admin who fulfilled to switch it around :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(yay massive indents! XD ) Not Forbidden Dance, eh? Hmm... I'll have to think on it more, than. And as for Forbidden Dance being out of print... well, that's rather disappointing, I've only read vol. 1, and none of the libraries in RPLS have any other volumes. =( Descendants of Darkness... I wanted to shoot the characters so often, it wasn't even funny. Just so long as Sci Fi doesn't decide to reair it for some asinine reason, like they insist on doing with Sword for Truth and Psychic Wars (Vampire Wars on the other hand, I don't mind so much, since its plot is actually quite interesting, even if a single hour-long OVA episode doesn't do it justice...). Hope you get the protection straightened out quick! ダイノガイ?!」(Dinoguy1000) 07:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Should try to find the other three...its a pretty good series and packs in a great story despite its short length. I've seen several of the volumes making the rounds in the remaindered book sales...oh, if its still going on check the Bookcloseouts.com 99 cent manga sale. They had some earlier. :) Isn't Sci Fi torturing people with the English dub of Rave Master now? (love the manga, but after 3 minutes of the dub, decided I'll skip the anime until its released properly :-P) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I wish I could, but I have no funds... =( Yeah, SF is running Rave Master, and I was actually looking forward to it (back when I was still naive and didn't know Tokyopop had dubbed it (I didn't know T-pop even *did* anime dubbing!) =P ). I missed the first two episodes, but then I got to see episode three, and I was like, WTF? I *know* the manga wasn't this stupid and annoying... Even Blue Dragon wasn't that bad. Still, I guess I'll soldier through it, just so I can say yeah, I've watched it, and I know firsthand how bad it was. Beyond that, though, I wish Sf would rerun GitS: SSS already, I really like Ghost in the Shell (for the awesome technology, the kickass story, and the killer animation). ダイノガイ?!」(Dinoguy1000) 19:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I only recall Tokyopop doing Initial D and Great Teacher Onizuka. They don't do much anime. Dandy Sephy (talk) 19:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've read some of GTO, but never seen the anime... I'd hate to see what T-pop might've done to it. =P ダイノガイ?!」(Dinoguy1000) 17:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

D: Sorry I haven't been editing, or talking to you guys, I'm pretty busy with school and stuff, almost the end of the year, and there's a lot going on... moocowsruletalk to moo 18:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to hear from you again, Moo! Don't worry, if it's school, that's obviously more important than work in WP. ;) Good luck with tests or whatever you have to do! ダイノガイ?!」(Dinoguy1000) 17:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I finally put a plot section on the Cobra page. Its still kinda rough, but we got the main idea. How do you like it Collect? Any suggestions?, I typed it kinda quick... : P Its actually a very good manga : ), if you can get past the really skimpy women... :P – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 20:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Case Closed

Hi, I've been checking the Bleach episodes and realize that for the Japanese titles, the only thing remaining of them are the romanization of the Japanese Kanjis, so I'm wondering if I should do the same for List of Case Closed episodes and remove the translated title so only the dub remains. DragonZero (talk) 23:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you mean? Bleach's translated titles and sub/dub titles are close enough so it only needs one. Case Closed's are very different, right? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wait...now I see. Someone did that in December, seemingly without discussion. Let me see why that was done before I can answer properly. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's the same on the Naruto episodes. Also how come the Naruto episodes each don't have separate season articles? DragonZero (talk) 05:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For those, it was discussed on the talk page that those combined need splitting, but it hasn't been done yet. For Naruto, are the titles greatly different? That's about the only reason I can think of that there isn't a translation, as the official titles are close enough to not need to list both (which is actually the case with most anime series). -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:49, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dragon, its the same for all animes. Pokemon, Dragonball... all have an episode list but dont have their seperate articles. My opinion, each episode is around 20 mins long (commercials removed) and because theres 20 minutes, there will be wayyyyyy to many atricles for one topic. You really want to keep it at a minimum. Things like (andi use them again) Merlin is good as its only had one season and every episode is 45 minutes long AND theres something to write about. This is in my opinion so collectonian, i dont want you linking an... MSMEDIA or something xD Goku1st (talk) 22:08, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
He wasn't asking about separate episode articles, but about the titles that appear in the episode list and why there was only the dubbed title and not the translated title, which are different for some series (see List of Tokyo Mew Mew episodes for an example of this). And NO television series gets individual episode articles just because of the length of the episode or whatever, as you already know. :P A 45 minute episode can be summarized within 300 words, same as a 25 minute one. ~should probably go deal with those Merlin episode articles, just don't feel like it (or so she said then ended up doing a little cleaning an tagging) ~ The Anime project is just better about stopping that mess than the TV project is. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not very, just small differences like "The Summoning Jutsu: Wisdom of the Toad Sage!" was the dub while Ero-sennin jikiden Kuchiyose no Jutsu dattebayo!(Perverted hermit something Summoning jutsu dattebayo). Also seeing the dragonball article, why are they divided in arcs? It seems messy. DragonZero (talk) 22:57, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's probably why then. If the differences are minor, both aren't used. You mean the main Dragonball article or the episode lists? If the latter, its following the official English arcs because of the lack of verifiable season divisions. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, apparently this episode is a special separate from the running series and the ova, should this be placed in a separate section called "Special"? DragonZero (talk) 05:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orig. Ep# Title Original Airdate

Template:Japanese episode list

It actually aired? Interesting...hmmm...yeah, for now I'd say a special section would work. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, on the List of Case Closed episodes list, someone split Conan Lupin episode from the other OVA's and I don't think it deserves it's own space just because it was aired on television and is longer than 30 minutes. Like Bleach, the OVA's have no order and are not numbered. DragonZero (talk) 01:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe rename the section to "OVAs and specials" to clarify it has both? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final questions. For the List of Shaman King characters, I changed many of he character's names to their English anime names but have been told their names remained unchanged in the manga so I just left it alone and assumed they're right. Recently, a person moved the article Rio (Shaman King) to "Wooden Sword" Ryu, which I assume is completely wrong since that's his nickname from Japanese partially translated to English. I'm not sure what his English name for the manga is, but it should at least be Rio or Ryunosuke Umemiya. Thanks for your help. DragonZero (talk) 05:52, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They should all use the English manga names, however I'm not sure what those are as I don't read the series. I have undone that move, though, as even if his English name is Ryu and not Rio, we don't include nicknames in the article names. May want to post to ask at the project to get someone else who has read the legit copies of the series to confirm the English manga names. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I can get many of the English names from my back issues of Shonen Jump, but most of the newer characters you'll have to ask someone else about, since I never got past the first volume (RPLS didn't have vol. 2 last time I checked). ダイノガイ?!」(Dinoguy1000) 18:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Ball

I was checking amazon.com and I found that the Dragon Ball Z series had season divisions of the digitally remastered series. Is this a reliable source? DragonZero (talk) 06:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, Amazon itself is not a reliable source for the season divisions, but the actual DVDs are. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If that's the case, should the List of Dragon Ball Z episodes be re-arranged and maybe have separate season articles? Since Amazon lists what are on the disc and what episodes they are. Also could you check SolanaRanger's edit to Rune Factory 2? DragonZero (talk) 01:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rearranged, possibly, but separated? Hmmm...I guess it needs it because it is 270k...but I really don't want to deal with it :P It took ages to get all of it merged back and cleaned up into two lists and get summaries added. For now, I'd just go with the rearranging and split if there is a large consensus. I just don't know how the main List of Dragon Ball episodes would end up if its doing double transcludes....ewww.... technically, per size its fine. :P -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What the Hell is this?

Have you finally gone completely mad? Yes I realise I really shouldn't be block evading but what is your rationale for reverting my perfectly constructive edits to Nemesis the Warlock, Azkadellia and List of characters in Skulduggery Pleasant? You'll notice that in the third of the above mentioned edits I was in fact reverting vandalism which now thanks to you is back in the article. It's Jupiter Optimus Maximus by the way. --81.159.154.160 (talk) 14:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reported for block evading. ɳOCTURNEɳOIR (t • c) 15:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonball Evolution Lock

I 100% realise this wasn't you, but any idea why the user who locked it until April 4th did lock it? Was there really any point? :S Goku1st (talk) 16:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it was me, in that I requested the page be locked due to the continuing arguments over what dates should be in the infobox and what the release dates are. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am embarrassed ;'( But i got a bit riht that it personally wasnt you who locked it. You got someone else to do it :P Goku1st (talk) 06:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
*grin* Kinda have to since I'm not an admin ;) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well you should be an admin :P Goku1st (talk) 17:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, I'm not tolerant or patient enough to WP:AGF with vandals, sockpuppeteers, and the really annoying disruptive people who run around trying to make a point and force their views through ridiculously excessive arguing until everyone gets sick of them and stops reading their conversations, or keep changing policies and guidelines then arguing it has "no consensus" just because they don't like it :P -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:51, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I followed up on your work and made a few tweaks. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anime Encyclopedia

Am I right in thinking you have the revised edition and not the "properly" updated book (the black one)? I'm just hovering over the checkout button on Amazon, although I'm loathe to give Clements any money, £13 is a bit of a bargain and as a resource it's damm useful. However it's been a looooooonnnnngggg time since I threw my copy of the first edition out so I can't remember if it gives start/finish dates for the shows? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dandy Sephy (talkcontribs) 08:33, March 31, 2009 (UTC)

Yep, I have the first edition (white cover). I keep meaning to get the newer one, but waiting for it to be a sensible price here :P I can't remember if the second one has start/finish either though...-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Collectonian, I just attempted a rewrite of the lead of List of Oh My Goddess! chapters; however, it still needs lots and lots of work. Would you care to read through the second paragraph and give your thoughts as to how it should be restructured, and what information should be cut out or added (yeah, I know, it's still *really* ugly)? (this goes for anyone watching this talk page who happens to have a few minutes, as well) ダイノガイ?!」(Dinoguy1000) 22:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. BTW, if you're working on the chapter list, this may interest you[1]. Jump, you have a source for that? :P -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:08, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I knew about Super Manga Blast! already, see SMB 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 (hmm, was linking to all 13 issues really necessary?). I was thinking about how to mention it in the list, but hadn't gotten to working on it yet. --Dinoguy1000 (talk · contribs) as 66.116.12.126 (talk) 04:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, well :-P List of Marmalade Boy chapters has an example of noting an English serialization :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
LOL... That works well for a release history as clean as Marmalade Boy's, but I'll have to see how the serialization info fits in on OMG's chapter list (and I need to somehow get ahold of serialization details, such as exactly what chapters were serialized). --Dinoguy1000 (talk · contribs) as 66.116.12.126 (talk) 05:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
LOL, true true. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My Progress

Hello Collectonian. I'm particularly pleased with my progress so far. Sorry about the vague editing descriptions earlier, but I was rudely interrupted by a persistant editor. I'm aiming to edit fair and square without any conflict. I have no wish to overwrite anyone's articles unless they're grossly incorrect. Perhaps soon I can look out for requests to fulfill. Do you have any advice on how I may be able to insert pictures? I look forward to hearing from you. Deltasim (talk) 17:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Having looked closer, I do agree in theory that your reverts were fine, they just needed to be explained that the new summaries were too long and detailed (keep in mind, Admiral Maxtreme is also a newer editor). I can't remember what the current rules are on how old an account has to be to upload images. The first thing, though, is to learn the image guideines: WP:IMAGE and especially WP:NONFREE, and look to good articles for examples of appropriate images and how to properly note a rationale and license for using non-free images. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No...April Fools...

Wow...sorry... : ( It was just a joke... : ( Didn't really mean any harm to ya... : ( Heh... – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 19:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello...... D: – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 20:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I just really hate April Fools and all the silliness associated with it. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I guess that you really don't like April Fools, but man! What was that edit summary! Jeez louise! I mean seriously, I imagined you turning into Beelzebub when I read that! That was really flippin' harsh! – J U M P G U R U ask㋐㋜㋗ 23:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well...got my point across now didn't :-P (and hey, I have to spin my head around 360 now and again to keep my powers *mua ha ha* -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well then, I guess you'd absolutely hate this and this. =) --Dinoguy1000 (talk · contribs) as 66.116.12.126 :  Chat  00:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes to both, and I finally took ANI off my watchlist because of the absolute stupidity going on there. *sigh* At least Google sticks to just one, official and very obvious prank. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VANDALISM, HOW DARE YOU ACCUSE ME OF VANDALISM. I ADD FACTS AND INFORMATION LEFT OUT AND BETTER CATEGORIZE THE INFORMATION—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Grave (talkcontribs) 22:16, April 1, 2009

No, you are once again being disruptive and trying to implement inappropriate changes and add original research to a character list. You have pulled this crap before and it will not be tolerated. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I put a lot of work in fixing that page, stop screwing it up —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Grave (talkcontribs) 22:17, April 1, 2009

You are the one messing up the page. I'm the one who FIXED the page, you are just trying to revert it back to a crappy version. You have had this explained to you AD NAUSEUM on multiple other lists. Just stop it. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This is the first im hearing ive done this multiple times. All the information i have ever added on this site is 100% fact. Dont ever, and i mean ever, lump me in with those idiots that but in those random and personal opinions in as facts —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Grave (talkcontribs) 22:21, April 1, 2009

Sorry, but when you stop doing it, you'll stop being lumped with them. And yes, I know you've gotten away with it on other lists, but please do not act like you've never been warned. Your talk page history doesn't disappear (and, in fact, the warnings are still there) and I was involved in some of those earlier warnings. To point you yet again: WP:OR, WP:WAF, WP:PLOT, WP:MOSTV, and WP:CONSENSUS. And learn how to freakin sign your message.-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Wow, who was that masked woman? I wanted to thank her....Thank you for the quick response on Mr Daniel Jones re Hershey's.

If I may ask a question, as I'm rather confused from what I've read on the official pages...how do I change a REDIRECT? I've written an article on Neisner's (the American dimestore chain) and a previous Neisner Brothers redirects to 'Variety Store'. I'd like to change the redirect to the new article. TaFoofbun (talk) 06:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When you are redirected, at the top of the page there should be a link that says something like "redirected from". If you click that, it will take you to the actual redirect, then you can access the edit tab. It should have something like #REDIRECT [[Target page name]] and you just need to change the name between the brackets. :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:41, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A message from the lead coordinator

Hello and congratulations on being elected as a coordinator for WikiProject Films! As the lead coordinator, I look forward to helping set an agenda for the WikiProject for this term and beyond, and I hope that you will actively participate in working through our agenda's objectives. I ask you to take a moment and review the goals of WikiProject Films (listed on the WikiProject's front page and reiterated here):

  • To standardize the film articles in Wikipedia
  • To improve Wikipedia coverage of films by adding, expanding and improving film articles
  • To serve as a central point of discussion for issues related to Wikipedia film articles
  • To provide the necessary framework to assist in bringing all articles within the project scope to the highest possible quality

Since you have stepped forward to take on the responsibilities of the coordinator position, my expectations are for you to play an active role in most coordinator-related discussions and to bring new ideas to the circle whenever possible. Since all seven of us will collaborate in discussions, I ask you to take a moment and leave a comment here about your background as an editor (I provided my own background). Outline what you believe your strengths and your weaknesses are, and summarize what you want to accomplish for WikiProject Films this term. ——Erik (talkcontrib) 12:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question about split

I think that some of these days (months), List of Bleach chapters should be splitted. However, how the lead and images from the splitted articles should be? Also, should the main list stay as List of Dragon Ball manga volumes or List of Naruto manga volumes respecting the Graphic novel list template? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The lead needs to be rewritten for each split article to focus a bit more on the volumes included. The lead image can be carried through, or maybe for the first list, split at volume 21 and have it have the first box set image instead. I believe they have now made it possible to do the transclusion's on the graphic novel list template the same as with episodes, so that would be the preferred option. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. The volume 22 starts a new story arc, so it could be easy. I see that List of One Piece manga volumes also made that translusion, but adding both Japanese and English volume titles (The volumes titles from Bleach are directly in English, so I think could be like the Dragon Ball list. However, I think only one the volume 1-21 list should be split for now since there are only 38 volumes.Tintor2 (talk) 16:18, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, chapter list transclusions are now possible, thanks to Goodraise (talk · contribs) making {{Graphic novel list/sublist}} (he beat me to the punch! =O ). I still have yet to look at the source in detail, to see what improvements I might be able to offer, though. ダイノガイ?!」(Dinoguy1000) 18:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Started discussion at Talk:List of Bleach chapters#Splitting. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you do that?

why did you remove the samurai champloo logo and replace it with a picture of the characters? that looks unprofessional in my opinion. anyways if you didnt like the logo you could also put the DVD cover case as well. that will look much more professional.DeathBerry talk 16:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A link to a diff or something would have been useful, particularly when you are asking about something from THREE months ago. Logos are not a useful nor appropriate image in the infobox. I moved the promotional image up into the infobox because it was the only other one in the article, and better than the logo. Its fine for illustrating the series for now. Eventually, yes, the DVD cover would be better, but no one had bothered to upload it yet to neither the main page nor the episode page and I didn't have the time to hunt it down. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:20, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very well then, i'll go and search for it. though the promotional image isn't that good either.DeathBerry talk 17:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proxy USer

I don't think you are in a position to say the things to me that you did. The comments I have made DO NOT rise to the level that would result in any type of putative action, and your comments on my page constitute harassment. If you continue to harass me and modify my legitimate comments on article pages, I *WILL* make a formal complaint against you. Proxy User (talk)