User talk:Kaizer13

All automated messages will be removed from this page. If you have something to say, say it yourself. --Kaizer13 (talk) 21:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Block

You have been blocked for an expiry time of 72 hours due to incivility and personal attacks. This is inappropriate. If you continue to attack other users, your blocking times will continue to increase. Nikki311 15:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Block 2

Your comments are disruptive. Calling me and someone else a Nazi is extremely rude. I find it extremely offensive from a religious perspective, as well. Opinions are welcome, but that really isn't called for. You have a history of these sorts of statements, and your block log also shows a history of incivility. I'm blocking you for 4 days, for said incivility and to prevent more personal attacks. I'm sorry you find administrators to be "Nazi/Fascist/Totalitarians", but I'm just doing my job. If you can't handle the way Wikipedia works, then perhaps it isn't for you. Nikki311 00:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

In defense of this guy here, someone who represses someone else's opinions because they do not agree with it does lean toward right-wingness. --77.106.158.254 (talk) 17:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Thats is not fair, you must be from somewhere that people can't express their opinions or summin. I was blocked by a punk for calling him dude, it's unbelievealbe Gangsterwolf (talk) 19:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Abusive edit summaries

This: [1] and [2] are unacceptable. Revert the vandalism or whatever, but don't be rude about it. RobJ1981 (talk) 19:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Hehe, still stalking me are you? Do you guys, like, get rewards for preying on people? Or do you just do it because you have absolutely no life to speak of? But hey, knowing you guys, you won't answer, or probably block me yet again. You know why people vandalize? Because they can get away with it. You do absolutely nothing about it. That's why this happens. You've got to tell them when to stop, and saying "Pretty please with sugar on top, don't do that again okay? 3>" won't help. --Kaizer13 (talk) 19:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Warnings and notifying admins works a majority of the time. Being abusive doesn't help things at all. If anything, it makes the matter worse. You need to settle down. RobJ1981 (talk) 19:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

• Indeed you do. Once you hit the radar, as it were, you can kiss your own prejudices goodbye and start to learn to edit cooperatively and with a minimum level of politeness, redneck or not. You either play the game or we take the ball away; simple as that. I'm putting you one a "one strike and you're out" warning. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 00:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

See? That's the kind of attitude you need! Keep it up, and you may stop being so universally hated on the internet. Or not, hey? By the way, it takes a redneck to know one. --Kaizer13 (talk) 11:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

A cup of tea

Hey, I know you feel stressed and all, but trying to invite some "robots" to a cup of tea because they "demonstrate the maturity of an eight-year old" isn't going to help anyone at all. I don't share your opinion, but I think you're entitled to your own opinion it as long as it isn't directed at anyone negatively. bibliomaniac15 Do I have your trust? 00:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey, you know as well as I do that if robots ingest tea or other liquids they will malfunction. Which would explain a whole lot... --Kaizer13 (talk) 16:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Another disruptive edit.

The revert you made in the article The Beatles was of a photo with a formal fair-use rationale included and is thus allowed in infoboxes. As you seem to have a history of unhelpful editing, I may report you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Steelbeard1 (talk) 10:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Okay, okay, fine. I made a mistake. It's just every time I've ever seen a non-free image get put up there, it's been deleted. I get the whole "I'm a new user, let's suck up to the admins" deal. I tried that once myself. If you want to use me as a stepping stone for your no doubt remarkable Wikipedia career, I'm not gonna stop you. --Kaizer13 (talk) 11:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kaizers Orchestra - Maestro.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kaizers Orchestra - Maestro.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Maskineri

Sorry about november --> November in the Maskineri article. Although I'm of Norwegian descent I know nothing of the language, and hadn't even thought of that as an issue as I merrily worked my way through the numerous other issues in music related articles. Thanks for the quick fix & happy editing Slysplace ^{talk ♫} 19:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, well it's easy to make some oversights when you're on edit rampages. Thanks yourself for helping to improve the article, it's my baby of sorts >.< --Kaizer13 (talk) 00:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Help

I need help with an article I made and this is it: Pro Wrestling Unplugged Roster So can you help me fix it up!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecwfan123 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Eeh, I'm probably not the best guy to help you with that, but thanks for asking anyway :) --Kaizer13 (talk) 18:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Who would you recommend??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecwfan123 (talk • contribs) 23:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

You can always ask at the professional wrestling Wikipedia project. --Kaizer13 (talk) 23:41, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a forum.

Please do not use talk pages such as - WWE roster - for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thanks. Kalajan (talk) 15:04, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Clear? Kalajan (talk) 20:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Whatever you say dude. If you don't want an opinion, restrict people from editing the articles. --Kaizer13 (talk) 21:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Downloadable content

what is it. plz help me tell me wat it is does it come wit the game do you have to buy it or wat?Kalajan (talk) 21:43, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, you download it through an internet connection to your X360 or PS3 console. The Downloadable Content is expected to be released in about two weeks' time. You can download the wrestlers Super Crazy, Charlie Haas, Ted DiBiase Jr. and Evan Bourne and some alternate attire like Christmas attires for Kelly and Candice and MVP's attire from last year...I can't really remember the rest. And it's unknown at this point whether or not you have to pay for it. Some interviews have indicated that you may not have to, though. Either way, it looks to be worth the money. Hope that helped. --Kaizer13 (talk) 23:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

So its not on ps2? Kalajan (talk) 18:35, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Nope. It's only available for the games with online support. They dropped that from the PS2 version of SvR 2009. Sucks, I know. --Kaizer13 (talk) 18:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Ok thanks Kalajan (talk) 15:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit summary at WWE Legends of WrestleMania

Don't be abusive. Telling someone to "get a life" isn't necessary. Revert the vandal, and leave it at that. RobJ1981 (talk) 06:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

That's not "being abusive", it's advice. --Kaizer13 (talk) 12:41, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Call it whatever you want, there isn't a need for it. Revert the vandalism, and leave people alone. It doesn't help to egg on vandals. RobJ1981 (talk) 14:44, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

LOL Gangsterwolf (talk) 18:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Help

Can i ask you two things? I'm Kalajan, and ive been blocked, can you tell me how to get unblocked, cos wikipedia explains itself real bad, and the oter thing is, how do i sugest making an article on priceless (WWE tag team)? I hope you'll help me as you have done in the past Gangsterwolf (talk) 18:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, if you've been blocked, you shouldn't really create another account. That's what they call "sockpuppeteering" around here and if anyone finds out about it, that account will be blocked too. Sorry dude, but I won't help people out who don't follow the rules. Perhaps Wikipedia isn't the place for you? --Kaizer13 (talk) 00:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Making two acounts isn´t illegal: Although multiple user accounts are allowed on Wikipedia in general, only one account of a given person should have administrative tools. The sole exceptions are by agreement of Arbcom or the community. (Wikipedia administrator in becoming an administrator), and where can i sugest creating a new article about WWE stable "The Legacy" Kalajan (talk) 14:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps Wikipedia isn't the place for you The Master Of All Wolves (talk) 16:56, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Check this out

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/203.208.72.197 The Master Of All Wolves (talk) 17:51, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

What?

Where'dyou get that from? The Master Of All Wolves (talk) 13:11, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Kazier I'm quite new I don't think I can report people?! The Master Of All Wolves (talk) 13:27, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Aw, come on, you even mispelled "Kaizer" like you did here. Could you just leave me alone, you're beginning to bother me. --Kaizer13 (talk) 13:41, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey I don't like making enemys, I was just a bit angry cos of the cheat code thing, but matt explained it to me and you were right. Anyway it seems I ended up losing don'tcha think? Will you acept my appologys and forgive me? I promise it won't happen again.

The Master Of All Wolves (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

The Master Of All Wolves (talk) 21:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Kalajan, leave Kaizer alone. He obviously doesn't care about WP:CIVIL, look at his user page, it even talks about how he doesn't like it here. He doesn't care that your new like he should. SteelersFan-94 04:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Did you send me that Email? Please tell me for future contact. I've replied. SteelersFan-94 04:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Cody Rhodes

Hey I was just bolding it cos its the title he has currently, if u've got a problem with that tell me and I'll remove it, but seeing as u've taken the liberty to do so already, there is no point removing something that isn't there. Kalajan 20:13, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

It's not the title he holds currently, he and DiBiase dropped it to Punk and Kofi a long time ago and they in turn dropped them to John Morrison and The Miz. Do you even watch anymore? --Kaizer13 (talk) 21:00, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh no sorry I had the channel where I watched wwe put down, sorry. Kalajan 21:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Infobox

I used the old one because the new ones code is messed up so it doesn't show up as an Infobox, you would know this if you actually looked at the article --afkatk signs off (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 22:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC).

Note

I did read the note. That was for future editors, if they need to warn you they can look in the edit history and see I already did so (so that they could go straight to Level 3 for example). I reverted your edit because you provided no source that the track is SmackDown's theme. See WP:OR for more. TJ Spyke 23:22, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I already know all about that crap. But it is possible to think outside the box. It's the same name as the SmackDown theme. Sources are all well and good for "controversial" edits but even a monkey with a retarding brain effection could plus together 1 and 1 and come up with a 2. It's just common sense. --Kaizer13 (talk) 23:25, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

There is no source for what SmackDown's current theme is even called, so you can't say it's the same name. Do not insult people when you are clearly in the wrong. TJ Spyke 23:37, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

2009

Happy new year!  Kalajan  01:38, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Inglorious Basterds

Hi,

I disagree on the subject concerning Tarantino's upcoming film. However, I won't change it now! See my comment on the film's discussion page. Regards. Dutzi (talk) 23:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Shouldn't the lead sentence be rephrased then? As it stands now, the reader might believe that the film is a complete western instead of a war film which features Spaghetti western elements. Dutzi (talk) 22:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Wrestling fans

This is exactly the sort of comment I'd expect to see from someone who's a professional wrestling fan. You people have absolutely no sense of civility or ability to work together in the Wikipedia environment. You're unable to control yourselves, yet you resist the attempts of anyone else on Wikipedia to try and bring order to the slop of asininity of these wrestling articles. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 20:30, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

The choice of one's entertainment is not an indicator of neither intelligence nor demeanour sir, and in the case that should be your viewpoint, you are one sad, biased, elitist snob. You openly provoke wrestling fans and generalize them. Why you have admin rights in the first place is beyond me - a calm rational not to mention balanced approach obviously is not in the job description. If you don't like wrestling at all; stay away from it and leave it to somebody who either likes it or remain neutral to it. Your attitude sir, is that of one who involves yourselves with matters you dislike (such as wrestling) just to make degrading, demeaning remarks. I advise you to stick to whatever it is you like doing and leave wrestling to people who like it. --Kaizer13 (talk) 20:36, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

[3] I've reported Elkman and I would appreciate you helped me there, (you know to get him into trouble). Kalajan€₣ 20:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not here to degrade anyone or telling Wikipedia they're doing a wrong job selecting admins. I won't join in on any demotion session. While I do strongly critique Elkman's approach to this situation, that is his problem and luckily, not mine. --Kaizer13 (talk) 20:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

He told you to suck his balls or something. Kalajan€₣ 20:45, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

The Brian Kendrick

Please don't do that. The [[Brian Kendrick]] is the exact same as [[Brian Kendrick|The Brian Kendrick]] but takes up less space. TJ Spyke 00:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, his ring name is "The Brian Kendrick" not "[The] Brian Kendrick". There's in fact a difference. What about The Big Show, The Ultimate Warrior or The like (hehe, geddit?) You're seriously worried about a couple of bytes of space? Now that's nitpicky. In any logical world, they'd link The Brian Kendrick, you know, logically. --Kaizer13 (talk) 02:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Super Reyes

Article creator provided a link with proof the album of this group charted. Please revisit the AFD. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Hardy Discussion

But Jeff Hardy wasn't the 17th. He was the first. No other person can claim that they captured the combination of all the wwe titles from the attitude era, or just the combination of titles in general which is, the WWF light heavyweight, the WWF Hardcore, the WWF European, the WWF Intercontinental, and the WWE title. nobody else has captured all five of those titles.