Jump to content

User talk:Nishkid64: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Pgecaj (talk | contribs)
889 edits
Carabera (talk | contribs)
252 edits
Line 175: Line 175:


I'd be glad if you could. User Loodong and I finally reached a consensus on how to word the disputed sentence, but after concluding our thoughts, we now have found enough common ground to properly render the sentence. However, to do so, you first have to remove the [[New York City|article]]'s full protection, and instead place back its semi protection. That way, we'll be able to edit it. By the way, I like the picture of your user page. I have a passion for photography! --[[User:Pgecaj|Pgecaj]] ([[User talk:Pgecaj|talk]]) 21:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
I'd be glad if you could. User Loodong and I finally reached a consensus on how to word the disputed sentence, but after concluding our thoughts, we now have found enough common ground to properly render the sentence. However, to do so, you first have to remove the [[New York City|article]]'s full protection, and instead place back its semi protection. That way, we'll be able to edit it. By the way, I like the picture of your user page. I have a passion for photography! --[[User:Pgecaj|Pgecaj]] ([[User talk:Pgecaj|talk]]) 21:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

== Advice for adminship ==

Hi

I was wondering if you could give me advice for becoming an administrator. What I mean is that what should I do to be worthy of being an administrator? [[User:Carabera|Carabera]] ([[User talk:Carabera|talk]]) 22:13, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:13, 4 April 2009

This user wrote Abram Lincoln Harris, which is a good article. This user wrote Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale, which is a good article. This user wrote Flag of Tunisia, which is a good article. This user wrote Félix Houphouët-Boigny, which is a good article. This user contributes to the Did you know? section on the Main Page. This user is an Indian-American. This user is an Indian-American.
This user wrote Samuel Adams, a featured article. This user wrote Joshua A. Norton, a featured article. This user wrote 1880 Republican National Convention, a featured article. This user wrote Arrest and assassination of Thomas C. Hindman, a featured article. This user wrote Lee Smith (baseball player), which is a featured article. This user wrote Stede Bonnet, which is a featured article. This user wrote T206 Honus Wagner, a featured article. This user wrote Louis Slotin, which is a featured article. This user wrote Barthélemy Boganda, a featured article. This user wrote D. B. Cooper, a featured article. This user helped write Ima Hogg, a featured article. This user wrote J. R. Richard, which is a featured article. This user wrote 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings, a featured article. This user wrote Saint-Sylvestre coup d’état, a featured article. This user wrote 1926 World Series, which is a featured article. This user wrote Alexandre Banza, which is a featured article. This user wrote List of heads of government of the Central African Republic and Central African Empire, a featured list. This user wrote List of Buffalo Bills head coaches, a featured list. This user wrote List of Sultans of Zanzibar, a featured list. This user wrote List of San Francisco 49ers head coaches, a featured list. This user wrote List of heads of state of the Central African Republic and Central African Empire, a featured list. This user wrote List of New York Jets head coaches, a featured list. This user wrote List of Baltimore Ravens first-round draft picks, a featured list. This user wrote List of Jacksonville Jaguars first-round draft picks, a featured list. This user wrote List of New York Jets first-round draft picks, a featured list. This user wrote List of Minnesota Vikings first-round draft picks, a featured list. This user worked on Portal:Business and economics, a featured portal. This user created Portal:Disasters, a featured portal.

Leave me a new message.

Please SIGN your comments using ~~~~. That way it'll be easier for me to identify who is trying to get a hold of me.
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 4 days are automatically archived to User_talk:Nishkid64/Archive 55. Sections without timestamps are not archived.
Wikipedia ad for Wikipedia
Wikipedia adsfile info – show another – #176
Archive
Archives
  1. July 1, 2006 - August 20, 2006
  2. August 21, 2006 - August 30, 2006
  3. August 31, 2006 - September 29, 2006
  4. September 30, 2006 - October 6, 2006
  5. October 7, 2006 - October 12, 2006
  6. October 13, 2006 - October 19, 2006
  7. October 19, 2006 - October 27, 2006
  8. October 27, 2006 - November 6, 2006
  9. November 7, 2006 - November 14, 2006
  10. November 14, 2006 - November 23, 2006
  11. November 23, 2006 - December 3, 2006
  12. December 3, 2006 - December 9, 2006
  13. December 10, 2006 - December 16, 2006
  14. December 17, 2006 - December 26, 2006
  15. December 26, 2006 - December 31, 2006
  16. December 31, 2006 - January 5, 2007
  17. January 6, 2007 - January 16, 2007
  18. January 16, 2007 - January, 22, 2007
  19. January 23, 2007 - January 29, 2007
  20. January 29, 2007 - February 7, 2007
  21. February 7, 2007 - February 16, 2007
  22. February 16, 2007 - February 22, 2007
  23. February 22, 2007 - March 2, 2007
  24. March 2, 2007 - March 10, 2007
  25. March 10, 2007 - March 23, 2007
  26. March 25, 2007 - April 19, 2007
  27. April 20, 2007 - April 30, 2007
  28. April 30, 2007 - May 14, 2007
  29. May 14, 2007 - June 3, 2007
  30. June 3, 2007 - June 19, 2007
  31. June 19, 2007 - July 10, 2007
  32. July 11, 2007 - September 15, 2007
  33. September 17, 2007 - October 3, 2007
  34. October 4, 2007 - October 15, 2007
  35. October 15, 2007 - November 1, 2007
  36. November 1, 2007 - November 19, 2007
  37. November 20, 2007 - December 14, 2007
  38. December 14, 2007 - January 3, 2008
  39. January 3, 2008 - January 17, 2008
  40. January 18, 2008 - February 6, 2008
  41. February 7, 2008 - March 3, 2008
  42. March 3, 2008 - March 24, 2008
  43. March 24, 2008 - April 23, 2008
  44. April 23, 2008 - May 15, 2008
  45. May 15, 2008 - June 11, 2008
  46. June 11, 2008 - July 9, 2008
  47. July 9, 2008 - July 29, 2008
  48. July 29, 2008 - August 20, 2008
  49. August 20, 2008 - September 12, 2008
  50. September 12, 2008 - October 21, 2008
  51. October 21, 2008 - December 1, 2008
  52. December 1, 2008 - December 31, 2008
  53. January 1, 2009 - January 24, 2009
  54. January 25, 2009 - February 17, 2009
  55. February 17, 2009 - Present

Nishkid, we need REAL justice in Wikipedia!

"Appear" is not a sure accusation. A "coincidence" cannot rule a sure accusation, in any court of the western world. And the CU "popped up" can be the usual hacker's action. We need REAL justice in wikipedia! Nishkid, are you of Slavic roots? It is very strange that you ADD even two other names to the accusation (Againstantism and Right2).--DuilioM (talk) 18:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anwar saadat

Hey,

A user you blocked recently has returned causing more trouble and after failing to win an argument has put me up for trial at [1].

I feel that this User: Anwar saadat has decided to pursue a case after understanding what he has been doing is wrong. You may check his recent edit history, where he has altered GAs and long-term stable articles causing edit wars involving several users. Furthermore what comes as a shock, is that he is going against Wikiproject:Indian cinema and deleting whole sections of GA articles, claiming they "are unneccessary to him".[2] More recently, he has been stalking my edits and has been trying to frame me out in every single way possible through images. I find it shocking, how this can continue!

In a personal claim, I find it quite shocking to see why he is still editing, looking at his edit history - he has been BLOCKED twenty one times and has been allowed to continue to stay on and edit inconstructively. [3] Moreover in his time, he has been blocked for : disruption, stalking, WP:3RR, gross violations, racist abuse, trolling, anti-Hindu remarks in extremist favour of Islam, [4] straight reverting and sockpuppetry. I cannot believe, why he is still editing.' I'm sure that racism alone is enough to get one permanently blocked, and with over 20 blocks, I'm very shocked. Hopefully you could help, get rid of him once and for all.

Moreover, I think this edit sums this character up. Here, try not to laugh!!!

Cheers. Universal Hero (talk) 15:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up re: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brunodam - two more accounts

Hi Nishkid, further to this SPI case that you CU'd yesterday, a corresponding CU at itwiki [5] has confirmed your results, and also turned up two other accounts that also exist here at enwiki. They are User:Mrs.Maria and User:Duilmodena. At enwiki, so far, Mrs.Maria is (very marginally) active - with a couple of amusing talk page posts, [6] and [7] - while Duilmodena is a sleeper. Should I wait for either of them to edit again and file a new SPI or is there enough there for them to be nuked? Regards, AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 16:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:20, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Rochelle discussion notice

New Rochelle problem discussion notification: I've opened a new discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Long-running problem with respect to New Rochelle area articles.

This relates to the 4 part proposal i opened on March 26, which was closed on March 27 and archived at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive187#Proposal for unban, apology, amnesty for Jvolkblum and related others, and topic ban for Orlady.

This is a courtesy notice to all parties who had more than a one word comment in the previous discussion. I think it is a problem that won't go away, and I hope that you will be part of the solution, whether or not you and I have agreed previously. I hope that we can at least clarify the problem, if not immediately agree upon a solution. If anyone thinks this is inappropriate canvassing, I am sure they will express that. I don't anticipate too many separated discussions on this topic, but if this one is closed and a new one opens, I'll probably notify you again, unless you ask me not to. doncram (talk) 03:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for arbitration - Unjustified ban of users

I have filed a request for arbitration regarding recent bans of user accounts from which no activities could be found that dispupt Wikipedia. The arbitration request can be found here: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Block of editors related to sockpuppet Jvolkblum You are not mentioned as an involved party, I send you this message as a courtesy for your information, and I hope that your opinion there can contribute to solve the issue. Thank you! doxTxob \ talk 23:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FAR Dhaka

Hi Nishkid, can you please take a look again and comment? We have fixed almost all the issues raised by the reviewers, so let us know if you have any other issues. If there are, please point them out at the FAR page so that we can fix them. Thanks in advance. --Ragib (talk) 23:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I'll try getting on that when an open block of time frees up in my schedule. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 17:41, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser

Hi,

Regards the ResearchEditor checkuser, previous RCU turned up accounts I hadn't flagged, but were by the same sockmaster. I've only seen this the one time, does RCU turn up all these accounts and it's legit to report them, or was it a one-time error? If this is standard, does this mean no more sock accounts were active? Thanks, WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 17:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you check both reports of the last sock investigation, on Feb 15th I reported 12 but got conclusions on 25; for the March 2nd report, I reported only Mmerct and Henry James Fan, but Kanonkas gave conclusions on three accounts (the above 2 plus Evetin). So I guess I lied, it happened twice. Basically I'm wondering if the RFCU now always reports all accounts used in a specific time period. Thanks, WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 17:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lovely, thanks. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 20:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Old sock back?

Hi Nishkid...remember this very prolific sock account that you helped me with? I'm suspecting that User:Gercekkaynarca might be a reappearance of this guy, based on some similar edits. Might I trouble you for a confirmation? Many thanks! AKRadeckiSpeaketh 18:05, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article needing feedback

Since you got 1926 World Series to FA status, do you think you could take a look at 2004 World Series at some piont. I am hopful I can get it to FA status also. Thanks for any help in advance. BUC (talk) 11:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sock of User:Hkelkar

Hi, I am having a problem with an IP who appears to be "Hkelkar." The IP is 72.179.41.129 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), which geolocates to Austin, TX. I noticed that his editing is similar to User:Vacuumloops, who you blocked as Hkelkar. Sure enough, many of suspected sockpuppets of Hkelkar also point to Austin, TX.

If you agree, can you please block? Chedorlaomer (talk) 22:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 22:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Another: Theycrashed (talk · contribs). What's wrong with this guy? He appears to have a thousand sockpuppets. Chedorlaomer (talk) 17:30, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also Lightmilitary (talk · contribs). Chedorlaomer (talk) 17:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Another Sixtynotes (talk · contribs). Thanks for all of your help with this, by the way. Chedorlaomer (talk) 20:52, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Query on block

Hello. I saw that you did a {{checkuserblock}} on 64.107.220.166 (talk · contribs · block log) for one year. Having previously dealt with this IP as being used by the sockmaster Qwertgb (a la Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Qwertgb), I was wondering if your block was related to this vandal, or someone else? Thanks, — Kralizec! (talk) 18:42, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, can you move the article New York City from full protection to its previous semi-protection state, since an agreement was successfully reached?

I'd be glad if you could. User Loodong and I finally reached a consensus on how to word the disputed sentence, but after concluding our thoughts, we now have found enough common ground to properly render the sentence. However, to do so, you first have to remove the article's full protection, and instead place back its semi protection. That way, we'll be able to edit it. By the way, I like the picture of your user page. I have a passion for photography! --Pgecaj (talk) 21:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Advice for adminship

Hi

I was wondering if you could give me advice for becoming an administrator. What I mean is that what should I do to be worthy of being an administrator? Carabera (talk) 22:13, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nishkid64&oldid=281783380"