User talk:NikoSilver

NikoSilver is currently working his ass off in real life and has decided that it is about time his long RealLifeBreak in favor of WP was interrupted. He will make frequent brief RealLifeBreaks, but you won't see him as much as you may be used to. (Yeah, he knows you're better off!)

NikoSilver would like to thank everybody with an opinion about The TruthTM on this page, undeterred about those monitoring this page and uniting to prevent its enforcement. Keep sending that valuable feedback please.

Archives
1  •  2  •  3  •  4  •  5  •  6  •  7  •  8  •  9  • 10 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20

Remarks

1. I will post responses below your comment right here, so "watch" my page (or select to watch whatever you edit in your prefs). Same I will expect from you when I message you. Otherwise, continuity is completely lost.
2. You can spy if you want... Only morons don't use e-mail when they want to conspire...
3. My e-mail application actually has a bell thingy. I'll read them faster if you don't message me as well that you sent me one. Actually, it'd be more alarming to send me an e-mail, telling me you've left a message in my talk! :-)
4. This talk is being automatically archived. All comments that are older than 10 days are removed and placed in the respective archive. In the rare case I don't respond to a comment, please remind me so.
5. Sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) that produce your name and the datestamp. The automatic archive doesn't work if it doesn't see a timestamp!

Δε θα κάνεις archive το talk page σου ποτέ; Telex 1 3 : 0 5 , 2 M a y 2 0 0 6 ( U T C )

Μπα! :NikoSilver: ^{(T) @ (C)} 1 3 : 1 8 , 2 M a y 2 0 0 6 ( U T C )

---

Kosovo etc.

whole discussion merged here...

Name discussion move

I suggest that you look at the first templated notice on Talk:Republic of Macedonia. -- ChrisO (talk) 22:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I suggest you abstain from administrative actions in the dispute because you are evidently an involved party. As for the template, you will notice that I have supported it myself over the years to avoid bickering (because this is its purpose), but this last post is the only coherent one for ages and it is a policy based proposal which shouldn't be buried along with the rest of the bickering shit in that page. It should be advertised and discussed to gain the maximum extent of consensus. NikoSilver 22:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Ela file

thelo ligo βοiθεια ado:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Brazilian_passport

ευχαριστώ πολύ file mou.

Reaper7 (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Near-vandalism

Niko, I reverted your last edit with an edit summary of "near-vandalism", and I mean it. Appealing to "unverifiable" about the naming issue is logically outrageous at the best of times (and no, I am not going to explain to you again why, because you evidently are not interested to understand), but doing so when the very source cited in that entry actually uses "Macedonia" pure and simple is the height of impudence. As for the main article, no, I'm not going to have more talk. We've had all the talk there was to be had on this topic, more than has been good for anybody. All has been said, now it just needs to be seen through. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

For the small issue: Hadn't checked the source. I had cited three reasons. The other two were "confusing" and "precedent". lol I acknowledge your kindness to add "near"... NikoSilver 14:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

For the main article: So in essence "you will do what you like because you say so and you don't care what everybody else thinks because you are the ultimate authority". Got it. BTW, I was very much interested to understand, but seeing that your position is me to understand, and you not, well... I'm inclined to follow your example. Last time you had given a very obscure ultra-elaborated wiki-lawyering interpretation on why you thought that articles related to Greece should be treated differently from those dealing with EU, UN, NATO etc. And then you are accusing everybody else that their opinions are not worth replying to. Please calm down, because you are losing it. I'm telling you because I consider you my friend also. You seem like you are obsessed with this. Really. NikoSilver 14:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

You telling me to calm down? Re, you've got some nerves. Says the person who was ranting on about how our wikipedia editorial decisions were putting millions of lives at risk... (As for "obscure ultra-elaborated interpretations", the only ultra-elaborated bit back in that argument was where I was trying to salvage your exception for the other cases. The basic argument against all these is extremely simple and if you can't see that I really cannot help you. It's very basic logic. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Gligorov

Is not dead. BalkanFever 01:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Ugh! Thanks! Correcting! NikoSilver 01:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Well well. Thanks for confirming that you guys are watching Greece day and night (and still not voting). Weird things...--Avg (talk) 01:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)