Jump to content

Talk:GameTZ.com: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 30: Line 30:
I am looking at the November 2007 issue of EGM right now and I can't find the listings of the top 5 trading sites. Is there a page number to look at? Page 40 as cited is an ad. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.100.254.216|68.100.254.216]] ([[User talk:68.100.254.216|talk]]) 15:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I am looking at the November 2007 issue of EGM right now and I can't find the listings of the top 5 trading sites. Is there a page number to look at? Page 40 as cited is an ad. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.100.254.216|68.100.254.216]] ([[User talk:68.100.254.216|talk]]) 15:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Page 40 seems to be accurate. See [http://images.kenyonhill.com/tz/egm.jpg] for example. [[User:Dstumme|dstumme]] ([[User talk:Dstumme|talk]]) 19:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
:Page 40 seems to be accurate. See [http://images.kenyonhill.com/tz/egm.jpg] for example. [[User:Dstumme|dstumme]] ([[User talk:Dstumme|talk]]) 19:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
:I will add that link in with the piece, but I removed the issue date, as it is definitely not November 2007.

Revision as of 01:16, 5 May 2009

WikiProject iconVideo games Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Template:Multidel

EGM mention

I added refs for the EGM mention. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Creator

If anything, Osborne's name should be removed, not Marrs'. Osborne had nothing to do with GameTZ as it exists today. His site consisted of him maintaining user lists by hand, and more little resemblance to GameTZ. What you're proposing is like saying Dave Thomas didn't create Wendy's, because McDoanld's existed first. Stop trolling and go back to GameTZ, CaptColon.... Dstumme (talk) 11:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's just the same guy that has a personal vendetta against GameTZ. Here's what'll happen: He'll delete references, he'll nominate it for AFD, he'll be shocked to find out that while administrators are not too bright, they will notice the history of bad faith noms and shut it down immediately, then he'll leave in a huff after the article is protected for a month. There's no reasoning with an obsessed child. 216.37.86.10 (talk) 14:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not so sure. At least some of this is coming from members of the site, playing pranks, not the AfD-obsessed troll we had before. Dstumme (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Top 5 Trading Sites?

I am looking at the November 2007 issue of EGM right now and I can't find the listings of the top 5 trading sites. Is there a page number to look at? Page 40 as cited is an ad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.254.216 (talk) 15:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page 40 seems to be accurate. See [1] for example. dstumme (talk) 19:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I will add that link in with the piece, but I removed the issue date, as it is definitely not November 2007.