Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 May 18: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Magooeymagoo (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
*What his mugshot looked like is not important to the article. There are free images of the subject, this non-free one is not required. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 19:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
*What his mugshot looked like is not important to the article. There are free images of the subject, this non-free one is not required. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 19:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep''' [[User:Sumanch|Sumanch]] ([[User talk:Sumanch|talk]]) 04:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
* '''Keep''' [[User:Sumanch|Sumanch]] ([[User talk:Sumanch|talk]]) 04:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep''' There is nothing wrong with keeping this image. |
|||
* '''Delete''' - seeing the screenshot doesn't help to understand the article. --[[User:Damiens.rf|Damiens<small>.rf</small>]] 04:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
* '''Delete''' - seeing the screenshot doesn't help to understand the article. --[[User:Damiens.rf|Damiens<small>.rf</small>]] 04:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 17:18, 20 May 2009
May 18
- Decorative non-free image. Unverifiable source. Damiens.rf 12:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Source is American Broadcasting Company. Image is of this fictional couple at their wedding, noted within the article. Flyer22 (talk) 22:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Furthermore, it currently has the wrong licensing. It is a simple screenshot of two fictional characters, and therefore should have a screenshot license. Flyer22 (talk) 22:52, 18 May 2009
- Went ahead and changed it to appropriate license. Flyer22 (talk) 22:56, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Furthermore, it currently has the wrong licensing. It is a simple screenshot of two fictional characters, and therefore should have a screenshot license. Flyer22 (talk) 22:52, 18 May 2009
- Keep The source is now clear and the picture is illustrative of a defining moment in their story. AniMatedraw 01:52, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Non-free image that does not significantly increase the readers' understanding. We don't need an image to understand that two characters got married. Jay32183 (talk) 05:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Per AniMate. - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:01, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Animated gif that is a severe violation of the minimal use element of the NFCC. A long animation is absolutely not needed- if anything is required, it is a single frame. J Milburn (talk) 18:28, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep A still frame can not capture the dynamic of the hit. The propaganda said that one of the immolators has died on the scene because of the flames. One death was required to make the whole story believable as being serious. This short animation, contains the most minimum of frames, where it shows how the victim actually falls from being hit. It also shows how heavily the alleged self immolators where dressed up. These kind of heavy gears are used for fire protection, see [1]. --HappyInGeneral (talk) 23:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. A still absolutely cannot convey the information currently conveyed by the clip. The gif contains the absolute minimum number of frames needed to convey that. Kindly see the fair use rationale.
- Dilip rajeev (talk) 05:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- WP:OI? Stifle (talk) 10:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Nope. The clip is a capture from the "False Fire" documentary[2].
- Dilip rajeev (talk) 19:52, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep on the condition that the caption for the image is composed of cited material. The length is not sufficient to exceed fair use. -- Earle Martin [t/c] 12:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Delete unnecessary animation--PCPP (talk) 05:52, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Dilip rajeev and HappyInGeneral - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Very high resolution, shows a large number of non-free elements, many of which are clearly replaceable. J Milburn (talk) 18:30, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep 3 of the 4 pictures presented are screen captures, of low resolution, fair use rationale is presented for these. The 4th picture is a text book presentation of the correct hand gesture, there is no copyright on that part of the image. --HappyInGeneral (talk) 23:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. These are screen captures - and the captures were not done from a high resolution video. 796 × 1,200 is just the size or dimension of the composite image - not the resolution of original images. Six images together being just 796 × 1,200 implies individual resolution is very low.
- Dilip rajeev (talk) 11:41, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. The composition and labelling of the image are original research. -- Earle Martin [t/c] 12:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Kindly note that the statements in the image are not orignal research. The stills are from the "False Fire" documentary. The statements as well as the composition is bsed on and can be sourced to the same documentary. The context in which the image is used and its caption make the sourcing clear. There is nothing of an OR nature in the labels/comments.
- Dilip rajeev (talk) 19:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete require better sourcing and rewrite of added captions.--PCPP (talk) 05:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have made clear the source and that the info can be directly sourced to the documentary. Could you please be a little less vague and specify what exact info you are looking for? It could as well be added now to the image description page.
- Dilip rajeev (talk) 06:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Dilip rajeev and HappyInGeneral - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:46, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Asdfg12345 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image is simply not required. It adds little to the article, and the use of a non-free image in this instance is not justified. J Milburn (talk) 18:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep This image shows yet another inconsistency in the story presented by the Chinese government. This image shows head to head, the person who was claimed by the government to have been identified and the self imolator. This way the difference is obvious. So in my opinion this image is needed. --HappyInGeneral (talk) 22:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Please note that it supports commentary in the section it is used.
- Dilip rajeev (talk) 19:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete image should be written in English.--PCPP (talk) 05:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Dilip rajeev and HappyInGeneral. Also, English is not a requirement for images. - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Copyrighted image used without adequate nonfree use rationale: image is from the film Raiders of the Lost Ark, but used to illustrate the San Francisco City Hall article. Building was constructed in 1915; free licensed images of the structure should be available. Its use as a film location carries slight importance within the article. DurovaCharge! 19:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- David Foster (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- What his mugshot looked like is not important to the article. There are free images of the subject, this non-free one is not required. J Milburn (talk) 19:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Sumanch (talk) 04:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep There is nothing wrong with keeping this image.
- Delete - seeing the screenshot doesn't help to understand the article. --Damiens.rf 04:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Alecsdaniel (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- I know I7 but I'm not sure whether to delete this file. It's longer than is generally allowed and is usage looks purely illustrative here, but I think we should have some discussion in case someone can justify its usage. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Note: WP:ANI discussion on deletions
Deletions below proposed by User:Damiens.rf are the subject of an Administrators' Noticeboard for Incidents discussion thread Wikipedia:ANI#Deletion nominations of images valid within articles. There has been some discussion that they are possibly disruptive but no consensus to remove them or box the sections below as yet. Interested parties are recommended to discuss meta-implications there and only comment on specific nominations below. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 06:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free poster. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:11, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The article already has one fair use image, File:CliffNina.jpg, which already serves the purpose of illustrating the couple. There is no commentary in the article explaining why this specific image is important to the subject or relevant to illustrate some specific point or other. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not decorative. Kiss between two fictional characters. Unless the reader knows what a young Tad and Dixie looked like, it does add to the article in a way that helps the reader understand that point in time.
- Note: This user is on a crusade against almost any image I have uploaded, when most are perfectly valid within the realm of fictional characters. Flyer22 (talk) 22:46, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. I also feel that I offered actual justification above for why this image should stay. Flyer22 (talk) 18:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Rather than re-copying my response again, I'll note that I was responding to your note, and that the note has nothing to do with whether to keep the image or not. Further, assuming bad-faith does not bring anything to the table that is useful to the debate. If you have issue with Damiens, take it up elsewhere. Here is not the place. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- I disagree. Flyer22 (talk) 23:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Rather than re-copying my response again, I'll note that I was responding to your note, and that the note has nothing to do with whether to keep the image or not. Further, assuming bad-faith does not bring anything to the table that is useful to the debate. If you have issue with Damiens, take it up elsewhere. Here is not the place. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. I also feel that I offered actual justification above for why this image should stay. Flyer22 (talk) 18:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete redundant with fair use File:TadandDixieMartin.jpg which is already at the top of the article and illustrates the same topic a bit better. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, gives commentary to article, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free banner. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete This fair use advertisment has no commentary on the article Tad Martin and Dixie Cooney that justifies why it is needed there. If there is something special to it, then explain it on the article and add a note here so it can be looked at. (It's also placed in the middle of the storyline section for no apparent reason, as if it was a decoration, so it should be moved to a relevant section when an explanation is added). --Enric Naval (talk) 15:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- We don't need to see this non-free magazine cover to understand the long-and-unnecessary non-free magazine quotations it's being used to decorate. Damiens.rf 20:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep It illustrates how the wedding was notable enough to be covered by those magazines in their front cover. The article does have too many fair use images, but this one should be ok. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with Enric for the same reasons he noted. Flyer22 (talk) 18:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Per Above. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Non-free image that does not significantly increase the readers' understanding. This issue of Soap Opera Digest can be cited as a source without actually uploading any of the content. Do that and we've achieved the same understanding without any non-free content. Jay32183 (talk) 05:53, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Enric Naval - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete decorative purpose.... seems to be there just to illustrate the storyline :P There is already a better fair use image illustrating the topic at the top of the article. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:29, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - No reson for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not decorative. Image depicts a significant moment between two fictional characters, backed up by critical commentary in the Cultural impact section.
- Note: This user is on a crusade against almost any image I have uploaded, when most are perfectly valid within the realm of fictional characters. Flyer22 (talk) 22:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. Flyer22 (talk) 18:48, 19 May 2009
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I moved it to the part of the article where the critical commentary and I made clear in the caption that the commentary exists.
- Some advice: for the people placing the pictures, please don't place them where they will look pretty, place them right next to the place where their importance is commented with sources, add a summary of the commentary in the caption so people will see more easily that the commentary exists. Reuse the relevant sources if necessary.
- For the people nominating, please don't put a "|" character between the caption and the deletion template because then the caption does not appear on the page, I had to look at the source code to read it. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - No Reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Enric Naval and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free magazine cover. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete There is a similar image where I !voted Keep because it illustrated how the wedding moment had been illustrated in the front covers. However, this one cover does not seem to illustrate anything specific, it just illustrate that the series reached the front cover, but all soap operas with a certain audience level will eventually be covered in the front cover of these magazines. This should be replaced with an image of a cover calling them "first black supercouple", which would actually be relevant for the text in the article. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not decorative. Image is used as a reference for the dates of the birth and death of a fictional character.
- Note: This user is on a crusade against almost any image I have uploaded, when most are perfectly valid within the realm of fictional characters. Flyer22 (talk) 22:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. Flyer22 (talk) 18:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22 and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:11, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free poster. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free magazine cover. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:18, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:13, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:13, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:14, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free magazine cover. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:14, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:20, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not decorative. Unless the reader can envision their first meeting, then it does add to the article.
- Note: This user is on a crusade against almost any image I have uploaded, when most are perfectly valid within the realm of fictional characters. Flyer22 (talk) 22:30, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. Flyer22 (talk) 18:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22 and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:15, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:20, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not decorative. Significant first kiss between two fictional characters, noted within the article, and not otherwise conveyed through text alone.
- Note: This user is on a crusade against almost any image I have uploaded, when most are perfectly valid within the realm of fictional characters. Flyer22 (talk) 22:33, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. Flyer22 (talk) 18:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22 and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free crop of magazine cover. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not decorative. The specific imagery is noted within the article. Unless the text can convey exactly what it means by that image cover, it does add to the article in a way that helps the reader understand the point.
- Note: This user is on a crusade against almost any image I have uploaded, when most are perfectly valid within the realm of fictional characters. Flyer22 (talk) 22:36, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. Flyer22 (talk) 18:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22 and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:19, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free magazine scan. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not at all decorative. This kiss is the subject of much criticism and controversy, very much noted within the article. The imagery of these two kissing became famous and was reported within several valid and world-wide sources. It is also placed in a section in which discusses the kiss. This imagery is not conveyed through text alone, and does enhance the reader's understanding of this very much-publicized kiss.
- Note: This user is on a crusade against almost any image I have uploaded, when most are perfectly valid within the realm of fictional characters. Flyer22 (talk) 22:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. Flyer22 (talk) 18:57, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. The picture is of a critical moment which is discussed at length in the article; in my opinion, the section would be incomplete without an image of this kiss. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. With these last 6 images up for deletion, it almost seems as if Damiens.rf has something against LBGT images on Soaps pages. Just sayin'. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:15, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Concur with FisherQueen & NeutralHomer. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 20:41, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22, FisherQueen and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- A non-free magazine cover for a cover that is not discussed on Soap Opera and is barely mentioned in Doug Williams and Julie Olson. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Damiens.rf 20:28, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Non-free magazine covers are not to be uploaded just to show who was on the cover. The issue can be cited as a source without using any image. Jay32183 (talk) 06:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:21, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free magazine cover. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Provides valid commentary to John nolonger being on the show - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- This non-free image is decorative in Luke and Laura Spencer and there are free alternatives available for Supercouple. Damiens.rf 20:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- The fact is...it is not decorative in the Supercouple article, in which it is used as the main image. This is the couple who started the term supercouple, which is very much sourced and commented on within the article. There is no free alternative image to use for this couple at their wedding (which started the initial supercouple era), and using any other couple as the lead (intro) image in the article simply because that image is free would be ludicrous. A free image of a celebrity supercouple as the lead image will not do, when taken into consideration that celebrity supercouples did not define the term and came after soap opera supercouples (at least when referencing the term supercouple).
- If the image has no significant purpose in the Luke Spencer and Laura Webber article, then remove it from there. But it has huge significance in the Supercouple article.
- Note: This user is on a crusade against almost any image I have uploaded, when most are perfectly valid within the realm of fictional characters. Flyer22 (talk) 23:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. Flyer22 (talk) 18:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22 and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free poster. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:36, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:25, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not decorative. Significant moment of the two characters saying goodbye at an airport, noted within the article. Flyer22 (talk) 22:07, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Also not a screenshot so much as a fan taken photo (hence crew/equipment visible), so it may be not "non-free".86.162.108.112 (talk) 23:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm, then, on second thought, I am not against this image being deleted at all. Flyer22 (talk) 23:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22 and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:25, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - image illustrates information in text and thus is relevant —added by Magooeymagoo (talk • contribs) 11:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:26, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep- illustrates points in article and is relevant
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - [[User:Neutralhomer|NeutralHomer]
] • Talk • 20:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:26, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - illustrates point in article and is totally relevant.
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:39, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - The image is more than decorative. It adds a visual depiction that enhances the understanding of a location shoot discussed in the article. Rocksey (talk) 06:25, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer and Rocksey - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:39, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the articles. Damiens.rf 20:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Unless the reader can envision what Todd and Blair's wedding looked like, along with the fact that this was before Todd's plastic surgery, then it does add to the article and helps the reader in understanding that moment. Flyer22 (talk) 21:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22 and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:28, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free poster. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free magazine cover. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:31, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:31, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not decorative whatsoever. Unless the reader can actually picture what Miller's Falls looks like, it does add significantly to the article. The image is of a significant moment of fictional character who has been led to his death, noted within the article. Image is absolutely valid.
- Note: This user is on a crusade against almost any image I have uploaded, when most are perfectly valid within the realm of fictional characters. Flyer22 (talk) 21:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. Flyer22 (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22 and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:31, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free magazine cover. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:32, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not decorative. This is an image of two fictional characters making love, which is not conveyed through text alone.
- Note: This user is on a crusade against almost any image I have uploaded, when most are perfectly valid within the realm of fictional characters. Flyer22 (talk) 21:47, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. And the above actually does offer justification for keep. Flyer22 (talk) 19:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22 and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:33, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:33, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not decorative. Image displays the expression of a fictional character upon believing that his wife is dead, noted within the article, which is not otherwise conveyed through text alone.
- Note: This user is on a crusade against almost any image I have uploaded, when most are perfectly valid within the realm of fictional characters. Flyer22 (talk) 21:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. And the above actually does offer justification for keep. Flyer22 (talk) 19:06, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22 and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:34, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:34, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free magazine cover. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not decorative. Though magazine covers are mainly allowed for use only in an article about that magazine cover, this cover is noted within the article and cannot be conveyed through text alone.
- Note: This user is on a crusade against almost any image I have uploaded, when most are perfectly valid within the realm of fictional characters. Flyer22 (talk) 21:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. And the above actually does offer justification for keep. Flyer22 (talk) 19:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22 and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Only because it's a poor quality screenshot. - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Radiantbutterfly (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Decorative non-free banner. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free magazine cover. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:20, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:53, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Todd Manning is a fictional character who has had his faced changed due to plastic surgery within the series. The image is illustrative of what Todd Manning currently looks like now, as portrayed by Trevor St. John, in his interaction with fictional character Téa Delgado. Flyer22 (talk) 19:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:20, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22 and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:53, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not decorative. It depicts a sexual encounter between two fictional characters, which is noted as significant and has critical commentary to back it up in the Téa Delgado Impact section. The imagery of these two having sex for the first time was rampant all over soap opera websites and within soap opera magazines due to its significance at the time.
- Note: This user is on a crusade against almost any image I have uploaded, when most are perfectly valid within the realm of fictional characters. Flyer22 (talk) 21:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I explained at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Damiens.rf as to why I could not assume good faith in this case. And the above actually does offer justification for keep. Critical commentary and significant moments spent between fictional characters that are discussed within articles, such as is the case with Todd and Téa on that deserted island, is always justification for keep for images displaying what is being commented on and or discussed. Flyer22 (talk) 19:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: The above note violates WP:AGF and offers no actual justification to keep. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:20, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Flyer22 and NeutralHomer - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Carly Greene (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Decorative non-free screenshot. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:53, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:20, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - This image provides a visual depiction of the second actress to play the role of the female lead in the fictional couple the article is about. It is just as important as the top image on the page and not at all just for decoration.
- It should also be noted that this was the same issue with the Thad and Adrianne mid-show promo 2006.jpg which Damiens.rf also nominated. The difference is, when I brought up that point with that article he rescinded the nomination. When I brought up that this one had the same type of purpose in a different article, not only did he not cancel that nomination, he didn't even bother to reply and engage in discussion. Rocksey (talk) 05:57, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer and Rocksey - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:39, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decorative non-free picture by some unidentified papparazzo. Helps nothing in understanding the article. Damiens.rf 20:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - The image is not just decorative as it gives a visual depiction of the filming of a location shoot that added significantly to the fiction, was spotlighted in the press, and noted within the article. The nominators description of the image as a "non-free picture by some unidentified papparazzo" is inaccurate. The source for the image was clearly given as a magazine. I reiterated it on the images page just to make sure it's clear what it is and where it came from. Rocksey (talk) 06:11, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per NeutralHomer and Rocksey - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:39, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Kekkomereq4 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Recursive source and no evidence of PD. Damiens.rf 21:22, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- See here and here, I've found the source.Kekkomereq4 06:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- The second link just credits "wikipedia". The first one credits no one specific, but has the generic bottom-of-the-page note "©RealNetworks, Inc. All rights reserved." and "©Copyright 2009 Rolling Stone;" --Damiens.rf 14:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- See here and here, I've found the source.Kekkomereq4 06:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Good image, no reason for deletion. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:20, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. --Silvestris (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete No source, no license. - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 06:40, 20 May 2009 (UTC)