Talk:Enquiry Concerning Political Justice: Difference between revisions
DYK |
→"Piracy": new section |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{philosophy|class=start|importance=|literature=yes|modern=yes}} |
{{philosophy|class=start|importance=|literature=yes|modern=yes}} |
||
{{dyktalk|25 April|2008}} |
{{dyktalk|25 April|2008}} |
||
== "Piracy" == |
|||
"Piracy," as applied to unauthorized copying of creative works, means just that: "unauthorized copying of creative works." But its use in this sense is controversial because, for one thing, it equates unauthorized copying with robbery at sea. Thus, for an encyclopedia to use "piracy" in place of "unauthorized copying" when the latter is in fact what is meant, is for that encyclopedia to take the controversial position that such unauthorized copying is in fact on par with robbery at sea. Since there is no imperative for an encyclopedia to take such a position, there is no need of it, and indeed it should be avoided. I made an edit to this effect, which was reverted by [[User:Ottava_Rima]] with the summary "nope." I've reverted the reversion and invite the reverter to provide a better explanation here, or else leave my good-faith and (I hope) well-reasoned edit intact. |
Revision as of 05:36, 25 May 2009
![]() | Books Start‑class | ||||||
|
![]() | Philosophy: Literature / Modern Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Enquiry Concerning Political Justice appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 April 2008 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/April. | ![]() |
"Piracy"
"Piracy," as applied to unauthorized copying of creative works, means just that: "unauthorized copying of creative works." But its use in this sense is controversial because, for one thing, it equates unauthorized copying with robbery at sea. Thus, for an encyclopedia to use "piracy" in place of "unauthorized copying" when the latter is in fact what is meant, is for that encyclopedia to take the controversial position that such unauthorized copying is in fact on par with robbery at sea. Since there is no imperative for an encyclopedia to take such a position, there is no need of it, and indeed it should be avoided. I made an edit to this effect, which was reverted by User:Ottava_Rima with the summary "nope." I've reverted the reversion and invite the reverter to provide a better explanation here, or else leave my good-faith and (I hope) well-reasoned edit intact.
- Start-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Unknown-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class philosophical literature articles
- Unknown-importance philosophical literature articles
- Philosophical literature task force articles
- Start-Class Modern philosophy articles
- Unknown-importance Modern philosophy articles
- Modern philosophy task force articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles