User talk:OlYeller21: Difference between revisions
OlYeller21 (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
Hey, I meant that your findings that the six you checked were notable regardless of the star indicated that the star was generally being given to notable people and not just willy-nilly. Like in the British honors system, some of the recipients may not be well known outside of their field. [[User:Drawn Some|Drawn Some]] ([[User talk:Drawn Some|talk]]) 11:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
Hey, I meant that your findings that the six you checked were notable regardless of the star indicated that the star was generally being given to notable people and not just willy-nilly. Like in the British honors system, some of the recipients may not be well known outside of their field. [[User:Drawn Some|Drawn Some]] ([[User talk:Drawn Some|talk]]) 11:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Ya but you forgot that I mentioned that only 10% of the recipients have Wiki articles. That doesn't imply that they aren't notable but it's a pretty good indication that at the VERY least, 50% of them are not. [[User:OlYeller21|<font style="color:#827839;">Ol<font style="color:#FBB117;">Yeller</font></font>]]'''<sup>[[User_talk:OlYeller21|<font style="color:#827839;">Talktome</font>]]</sup> 13:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
:Ya but you forgot that I mentioned that only 10% of the recipients have Wiki articles. That doesn't imply that they aren't notable but it's a pretty good indication that at the VERY least, 50% of them are not. [[User:OlYeller21|<font style="color:#827839;">Ol<font style="color:#FBB117;">Yeller</font></font>]]'''<sup>[[User_talk:OlYeller21|<font style="color:#827839;">Talktome</font>]]</sup> 13:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
==Comedian Jay Dee== |
|||
Can we bring this article back to life now? There is now another news source. Before you just needed one more news source and here it is: http://www.tulsapeople-digital.com/tulsapeople/200906/?u1=texterity [[Special:Contributions/208.191.26.53|208.191.26.53]] ([[User talk:208.191.26.53|talk]]) 18:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:06, 28 May 2009
Welcome! Feel free to leave comments, critiques, etc., below. Unless you specifically request that I answer on your talk page, I'll be answering here, as I prefer to keep as much of the conversation in one place as possible. I'm very new to Wikipedia so if I do something wrong, please let me know and give me as much information as possible so that I can make sure that I don't make the same mistake again. Thanks!
Please add all new material to the bottom of the page or click here.
1 |
Are you from the Ohio area? A Wikipedian meetup is taking place on July 18, 2009 in Columbus. If you are interested in coming or would like more information, see the first Ohio meetup page. |
Thanks! --Rkitko (talk) 22:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
~ mazca t|c 21:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
When? :)
I don't think you meant WP:NOTNOW in AfD... maybe you meant WP:CRYSTAL? Gigs (talk)
Personal Attack
I was personally attacked yesterday at Signs (Bloc Party song) by a user who I won't name. It sort of hurt my feelings so I'm going to take a short break. I'm not crying about it or anything but I realized that if Wikipedia editing effects my life outside of Wikipedia, it's probably time for a break. Just an FYI for anyone who may be looking for me. OlYellerTalktome 14:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Now another editor is saying that I have a personal vendetta against an article. I couldn't care less about a single article being deleted or not. I need more break time. OlYellerTalktome 03:27, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, OlYeller, you shouldn't take the personal attacks at Talk:Signs (Bloc Party song) too seriously. All I see is a user who is frustrated that his article was tagged for deletion. I've been attacked before; see here and here. I wasn't offended either of those times because I could see how frustration of the users when their articles were deleted. Maybe I have a thick skin. Anyways, you shouldn't let anything on Wikipedia get too personal because it's just not worth it. If editing the deletion areas of Wikipedia is too stressful, I would recommend writing on something random that you have never heard of before (see Wikipedia:Recent changes article requests for ideas), or just take a short wikibreak. Best, Cunard (talk) 08:16, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Delboy deletion
How can a band be notable without the members themselves being notable? A band is it's members.--DunkinDonutBoy (talk) 05:45, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- The same way that not every soldier in an army is notable. Is an army not its members? OlYellerTalktome 13:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Matt Pawlowski Deletion
Hello. I was wondering why the heck you would put this article up for deletion? Why would you do such a thing? Seriously? It has credible sources. Everything's legit. Care to explain? (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC).
- I explained in the AfD and on your talk page (see here). OlYellerTalktome 03:06, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Shadowjams (talk) 07:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Added another message. Sorry if my previous response was snappy. I didn't mean for it to be that way. Shadowjams (talk) 20:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Just so you know...
[1] - you're replying to a year-old thread. Maybe you knew, but I reckon a new section might be appropriate. Fritzpoll (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Lol, touche. I wonder what the best way to reevaluate this proposed guideline would be. Any ideas? OlYellerTalktome 15:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- New section, think about a rewrite. Then advertise... Fritzpoll (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- It might even go over better if it's presented by an ARS member as opposed to a non-member (if all the us vs them beliefs are true). OlYellerTalktome 15:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm. Not sure how well that will go down. Fritzpoll (talk) 15:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- With the supporters or non-supporters of the current ARS? OlYellerTalktome 15:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm. Not sure how well that will go down. Fritzpoll (talk) 15:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- It might even go over better if it's presented by an ARS member as opposed to a non-member (if all the us vs them beliefs are true). OlYellerTalktome 15:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- New section, think about a rewrite. Then advertise... Fritzpoll (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Dank (push to talk) 15:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Lessie Wei
Hey, I meant that your findings that the six you checked were notable regardless of the star indicated that the star was generally being given to notable people and not just willy-nilly. Like in the British honors system, some of the recipients may not be well known outside of their field. Drawn Some (talk) 11:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ya but you forgot that I mentioned that only 10% of the recipients have Wiki articles. That doesn't imply that they aren't notable but it's a pretty good indication that at the VERY least, 50% of them are not. OlYellerTalktome 13:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Comedian Jay Dee
Can we bring this article back to life now? There is now another news source. Before you just needed one more news source and here it is: http://www.tulsapeople-digital.com/tulsapeople/200906/?u1=texterity 208.191.26.53 (talk) 18:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC)