Talk:Judas O: Difference between revisions
m moved Talk:Judas 0 to Talk:Judas Ø: Per use in article |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Maybe this should be [[Judas Ø]], seeing as that's what it says on the disc itself.--[[User:HamYoyo|[[User:HamYoyo|HamYoyo]] [[User talk:HamYoyo|(Talk)]]]] 16:20, Jun 3, 2004 (UTC) |
Maybe this should be [[Judas Ø]], seeing as that's what it says on the disc itself.--[[User:HamYoyo|[[User:HamYoyo|HamYoyo]] [[User talk:HamYoyo|(Talk)]]]] 16:20, Jun 3, 2004 (UTC) |
||
:Well, the CD case says [[Judas O]]. --[[User:Dbenbenn|Dbenbenn]] 22:49, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
:Well, the CD case says [[Judas O]]. --[[User:Dbenbenn|Dbenbenn]] 22:49, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
||
::I agree, the way I see it, people title it ''Judas Ø'' because it looks neat to have an unusual character in the title of an album. It is called ''Judas O'' on both the back of the CD case and in the booklet. It seems reason enough to use an O instead of an Ø. Perhaps the title of this article can be "Judas O", and have a note in the introduction paragraph like "(also known as '''Judas Ø''')"[[Special:Contributions/124.177.104.225|124.177.104.225]] ([[User talk:124.177.104.225|talk]]) 14:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
I don't understand why [[Rotten Apples]] and [[Judas 0]] have two separate pages. It would be like separate pages for ''Dawn to Dusk'' and ''Twilight to Starlight''. --[[User:Dbenbenn|Dbenbenn]] 22:49, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
I don't understand why [[Rotten Apples]] and [[Judas 0]] have two separate pages. It would be like separate pages for ''Dawn to Dusk'' and ''Twilight to Starlight''. --[[User:Dbenbenn|Dbenbenn]] 22:49, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:12, 29 May 2009
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Albums Redirect‑class | ||||||
|
Template:WikiProject Smashing Pumpkins
Maybe this should be Judas Ø, seeing as that's what it says on the disc itself.--[[User:HamYoyo|HamYoyo (Talk)]] 16:20, Jun 3, 2004 (UTC)
- Well, the CD case says Judas O. --Dbenbenn 22:49, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I agree, the way I see it, people title it Judas Ø because it looks neat to have an unusual character in the title of an album. It is called Judas O on both the back of the CD case and in the booklet. It seems reason enough to use an O instead of an Ø. Perhaps the title of this article can be "Judas O", and have a note in the introduction paragraph like "(also known as Judas Ø)"124.177.104.225 (talk) 14:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand why Rotten Apples and Judas 0 have two separate pages. It would be like separate pages for Dawn to Dusk and Twilight to Starlight. --Dbenbenn 22:49, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Judas 0 was a limited edition release. It's not a given that every copy of Rotten Apples also contains Judas 0, as is the case with MCIS. Pumpkingrrl 07:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Most limited edition bonus discs are put on the same page as what they were released with, but in this case, it seems like Judas 0 had enough of a life on its own. I wouldn't be against the combination, but I like the current separation. Folkor 16:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- This is true. Most limited edition bonus discs usually have either not many tracks on them, or are live recordings; alternate cuts; etc...
- I consider this disc substantial enough to be it's own album. 125.238.16.70 00:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Judas 0, Judas O, Judas Ø...?
Does anyone have a definitive answer as to which variation is the correct one? Zero, O without Stroke, O with Stroke? -- Christopher C. Parker t c 19:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Smashing Pumpkins Greatest Hits album cover.jpg
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Smashing Pumpkins Greatest Hits album cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.