Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DraXsiS: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m SD
m fix link
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''Speedy''' per A7. Very little sourcing on Google, no evidence given that verifiable sourcing might exist offline. I just declined a speedy tag because of this existing AfD, but I really don't see any grounds for keeping it.--[[User:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan]] ([[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|talk]]) 16:16, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
*'''Speedy''' per A7. Very little sourcing on Google, no evidence given that verifiable sourcing might exist offline. I just declined a speedy tag because of this existing AfD, but I really don't see any grounds for keeping it.--[[User:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan]] ([[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|talk]]) 16:16, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', but not speedy delete. The article claims more than one album released, and determining whether the label is important enough for that to pass [[WP:MUSIC]] criterion 5 requires examination of sources, so needs scrutiny at AfD rather than unilateral deletion. On looking through the [http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=DraXsiS&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a Google web results] I can't see anything that looks to me, as a non-expert in this field, to be an independent reliable source, and [http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&q=DraXsiS&cf=all Google News] finds nothing. [[User:Phil Bridger|Phil Bridger]] ([[User talk:Phil Bridger|talk]]) 21:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', but not speedy delete. The article claims more than one album released, and determining whether the label is important enough for that to pass [[WP:MUSIC]] criterion 5 requires examination of sources, so needs scrutiny at AfD rather than unilateral deletion. On looking through the [http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=DraXsiS&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a Google web results] I can't see anything that looks to me, as a non-expert in this field, to be an independent reliable source, and [http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&q=DraXsiS&cf=all Google News] finds nothing. [[User:Phil Bridger|Phil Bridger]] ([[User talk:Phil Bridger|talk]]) 21:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete''', per SarekOfVulcan. I was hoping [www.witchschool.com/friends/DraXsiS this link] would provide some evidence of significance, but was sorely disappointed. :( --[[User:Kuzaar|Kuzaar]]<sup>-[[User talk:Kuzaar|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Kuzaar|C]]-</sup> 12:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete''', per SarekOfVulcan. I was hoping [http://www.witchschool.com/friends/DraXsiS this link] would provide some evidence of significance, but was sorely disappointed. :( --[[User:Kuzaar|Kuzaar]]<sup>-[[User talk:Kuzaar|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Kuzaar|C]]-</sup> 12:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:42, 10 June 2009

DraXsiS

DraXsiS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:BAND. A google search for notability brings back no significant hits. Zero hits on google news. Article has no references. The band is unsigned and haven't released any albums on any major labels. -- Darth Mike (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. I think it's unbecoming of any editor, let alone an administrator, to call for deletion of an article, let alone speedy deletion, without reading the article properly. If someone can take the time to write an article then the least courtesy that we can pay is to take the time to read it. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy per A7. Very little sourcing on Google, no evidence given that verifiable sourcing might exist offline. I just declined a speedy tag because of this existing AfD, but I really don't see any grounds for keeping it.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:16, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, but not speedy delete. The article claims more than one album released, and determining whether the label is important enough for that to pass WP:MUSIC criterion 5 requires examination of sources, so needs scrutiny at AfD rather than unilateral deletion. On looking through the Google web results I can't see anything that looks to me, as a non-expert in this field, to be an independent reliable source, and Google News finds nothing. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete, per SarekOfVulcan. I was hoping this link would provide some evidence of significance, but was sorely disappointed. :( --Kuzaar-T-C- 12:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]