User talk:Texcarson

Your RFA

is not going well. You might want to consider withdrawal for now. In the future, once you've taken aboard any constructive criticism, you might try again. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 16:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Your recent RfA

I am sorry, but I have closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, you only have 1600 edits on Wikipedia; while your edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards by which they judge RfA candidates, this particular RfA was all but assured of not passing.

I am sorry about this, and I hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I am confident that you would be able to submit a successful RfA in the future. You may wish to consider applying for an evaluation by other Wikipedia editors for feedback on how to obtain the necessary experience. Once you are ready to request adminship again, there is a great admin coaching program available, as well as a guide to requests for adminship.

If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:27, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Rfa

Well, now i need the huggle application to cheat and amass an absurd amount of edits in a short span of time. Texcarson (talk) 18:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I made 1,000 reversions a month for many months by hand. (There has been a bias against Huggle recently. I don't know which way that trend will go. I don't recommend Huggle for that reason.) If like me, you have a physical condition that makes typing difficult, you can always copy some of the vandal warnings fromWikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace#Multi-level_templates to text file and then use it to copy/paste warnings to vandal pages, tailoring them as needed. I use twinkle myself. It does not go so fast that I can't prevent mistakes and has a nice selection. I recommend avoiding animation until you have a clear understanding of the relevant policies and a reputation for having that understanding. My first animated tool was VandalProof. I had to apply for that and had already made thousands of reversions when I got it. Be sure to not neglect article building-- that is valued by the community. There are still many article that need improvement. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 18:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

You know, you really can't expect anyone to trust you with the tools when you make unconstructive edits like this. Dlohcierekim 19:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Atlantic Records, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gpia7r (talk) 19:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Constant Vandalism

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Gpia7r (talk) 19:20, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Userpage relatiation

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User:Gpia7r. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Gpia7r (talk) 19:28, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for vandalism for 72 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 19:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Texcarson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

for great justice and epic lulz

Decline reason:

No. EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment on block request

LULZ seems to be the problem and the reason for your block. Would suggest some serious rethinking on your part before you are permanently blocked. Recusing myself from officially denying unblock. Dlohcierekim 21:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

YOU FUCKERS, i asked for rollback to test Huggle, Malinaccier gave me rollback months ago, why are you making this so difficult? Texcarson (talk) 21:21, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Texcarson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Rollback you retards

Decline reason:

Insults are a poor way to request an unblock. EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What do you hope to achieve by acting out after your recent RfA? I can understand why you might feel slighted, but this sort of behavior isn't going to make you any friends, and it definitely isn't going to enhance your standing with the community if you hope to try again at a later date. Remember that everything you say on the internet is liable to be recorded permanently for anyone to use or quote -- or even cherry pick -- at their own leisure. Reputation is very difficult to build, but very easy to damage or destroy. Please, for your own sake, try to find a slightly less public means of venting your frustrations. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

But if JzG can call other people "cunts", why can't i insult people when i feel like to? Texcarson (talk) 22:33, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Does JzG make a habit of vandalizing articles, throwing temper tantrums, and calling uninvolved users "YOU FUCKERS" when they try to help? – Luna Santin (talk) 22:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

But Gurch does vandalize, for example. Texcarson (talk) 22:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)