Jump to content

Talk:Video Electronics Standards Association: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Chinese version: worth discussing here.
Line 12: Line 12:


所謂的視訊電子標準協會'''Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA)''' 乃是一個國際性的團體, 成立於1980年代的後期由 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEC_Corporation NEC Home Electronics]以及八個視訊顯示器adaptor製造商所聯合發起的. 起初的目標為制定一個標準提供給解析度為 800x600 SVGA 的視訊顯示器使用. [[User:Andypongtw|Andypongtw]] ([[User talk:Andypongtw|talk]]) 17:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
所謂的視訊電子標準協會'''Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA)''' 乃是一個國際性的團體, 成立於1980年代的後期由 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEC_Corporation NEC Home Electronics]以及八個視訊顯示器adaptor製造商所聯合發起的. 起初的目標為制定一個標準提供給解析度為 800x600 SVGA 的視訊顯示器使用. [[User:Andypongtw|Andypongtw]] ([[User talk:Andypongtw|talk]]) 17:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
:Probably. --[[Special:Contributions/76.254.85.70|76.254.85.70]] ([[User talk:76.254.85.70|talk]]) 19:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


== "Coordinated Video Timings" redirects here ==
== "Coordinated Video Timings" redirects here ==

Revision as of 19:23, 26 July 2009

DisplayPort

Add DisplayPort to the list of VESA standards? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frap (talkcontribs) 17:08, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean

I'm not a fan of how this is phrased.

VESA had been criticized for holding miserable track record when it comes to digital interface standards.[2]

-216.138.38.86 20:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it. The linked criticism wasn't a reliable source. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 20:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese version

所謂的視訊電子標準協會Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) 乃是一個國際性的團體, 成立於1980年代的後期由 NEC Home Electronics以及八個視訊顯示器adaptor製造商所聯合發起的. 起初的目標為制定一個標準提供給解析度為 800x600 SVGA 的視訊顯示器使用. Andypongtw (talk) 17:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably. --76.254.85.70 (talk) 19:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Coordinated Video Timings" redirects here

IMO it's noteworthy enough to warrant its own article, as a very large number of monitors (especially LCDs) use CVT-based custom resolutions.24.106.24.122 (talk) 20:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]