User talk:MadeYourReadThis: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Re: The Crystal Caravan question: new section |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
I am intrigued that you are so quick to jump on an article in progress, just commenced, about a school halfway round the world which is notable in being a pioneering example of a specific type of school education in Oceania, when there are numerous examples of [[List of high schools in North Carolina|schools in North Carolina]] which are smaller or less notable in being dime-a-dozen in their region and whose websites haven't been progressed beyond the most embryonic form in months. Random examples include [[New Garden Friends School]], [[Hugh M Cummings High School]] or [[Cape Fear Academy]]. Had you chosen to add the sort of tag applied to North Carolina's [[Charlotte Christian School]] I would have understood; but to jump on an article which is so obviously a new article and a work in progress with reasonably heavy-handed tags such as those applied seems a little over-zealous. I would ask you to kindly reconsider. I have, by the way, based my structure on that of my own city's [[Presbyterian Ladies' College, Perth]] -- [[User:Ishel99|Ishel99]] ([[User talk:Ishel99|talk]]) 16:27, 19 August 2009 (UTC) |
I am intrigued that you are so quick to jump on an article in progress, just commenced, about a school halfway round the world which is notable in being a pioneering example of a specific type of school education in Oceania, when there are numerous examples of [[List of high schools in North Carolina|schools in North Carolina]] which are smaller or less notable in being dime-a-dozen in their region and whose websites haven't been progressed beyond the most embryonic form in months. Random examples include [[New Garden Friends School]], [[Hugh M Cummings High School]] or [[Cape Fear Academy]]. Had you chosen to add the sort of tag applied to North Carolina's [[Charlotte Christian School]] I would have understood; but to jump on an article which is so obviously a new article and a work in progress with reasonably heavy-handed tags such as those applied seems a little over-zealous. I would ask you to kindly reconsider. I have, by the way, based my structure on that of my own city's [[Presbyterian Ladies' College, Perth]] -- [[User:Ishel99|Ishel99]] ([[User talk:Ishel99|talk]]) 16:27, 19 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Re: The Crystal Caravan question == |
|||
I play in the band. All facts here are taken from third part sources such as magazines, AllMusic and news papers. Are there more sources and footnotes you need? |
|||
[[User:Swumpf|Swumpf]] ([[User talk:Swumpf|talk]]) 16:27, 19 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:27, 19 August 2009
I am not an admin, I'm an editor like you. I did not delete your page and I cannot restore it. If you are here to comment on a page I marked with maintenance concerns or for deletion please read the following first and click on the link in the yellow box below to leave me a message if you have additional questions:
- for all articles, please refer to WP:V, WP:RS and especially WP:N
- for articles about bands, musical artists, albums and songs: WP:BAND WP:NSONGS
- for companies and organizations: WP:CORP
- for radio stations: WP:WPRS
- for articles tagged with copyright concerns: Wikipedia:Copyright violations
- for articles about you, your band, your company, or your club: WP:COI and WP:AUTO
If you would like to comment on the speed that I and other New Page Patrollers tag newly created articles, consider creating the page under your user space first or at least adding the {{underconstruction}} tag to let us know you haven't posted an incomplete, unsourced article for others to finish. How else are we to know? With that out of the way....
Hi RadioFan. I think Eleanor Catton is on OK shape now for you to remove the cleanup tag? NBeale (talk) 13:39, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- The cleanup tag has been removed but it was replaced by a refimprove tag. There are a number of external links appear to be references but are not cited.--RadioFan (talk) 15:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Autoreviewer
I'm not an editor, I'm an admin like me. I've granted you autoreviewer access following a request from User:Ironholds. Please be gentle! Mahalo, Skomorokh 02:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appreciate the vote of confidence and shall do my best to use it well.--RadioFan (talk) 11:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- No problem - keep writing the good articles! Ironholds (talk) 11:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Your JL Naudin deletion nomnination
Like I said RadioFan, have patience, and stop straining for fame over your assumptions. And did you notice the page was just created? You're being stupid.Serpentdove (talk) 12:00, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- The article is being discussed for deletion among all editor, please comment there and please avoid the personal attacks, it's not helpful.--RadioFan (talk) 12:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
I am trying to create an entry for Destiny Online and I have no idea why its being marked for deletion. Also I can't upload images or screenshots to make the entry more informative. Please help me. If need be, please email me at wwwescape@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwwescape (talk • contribs) 12:39, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- It was marked for deletion (and was recently deleted) because it does not meet notability guidelines. Also if you click on the Upload File link in the toolbox to the left, you'll be able to upload screenshots. See Wikipedia:Images for more information including some things you need to know about permissions and tagging the image to reflect those permissions. Without that, the images are likely to be deleted.--RadioFan (talk) 12:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
The Crystal Caravan
Hello!
The facts in the article about The Crystal Caravan are based around many third part sources. I cant see why this has been nominated to deletion. Please let me know so I can deal with these possible issues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swumpf (talk • contribs) 16:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- These references confirm the existence of the group but dont do much to establish it's notability. Allmusic is frequently referenced in articles about bands but the entry for this band in allmusic has little content, only mentions the one album and includes a tracklist. The reliability of the other items referenced is not clear. If this band or the album it produced has been reviewed in a mainstream music magazine or newspaper, that would do a lot to help establish its notability. See WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG for more info.--RadioFan (talk) 16:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
I am intrigued that you are so quick to jump on an article in progress, just commenced, about a school halfway round the world which is notable in being a pioneering example of a specific type of school education in Oceania, when there are numerous examples of schools in North Carolina which are smaller or less notable in being dime-a-dozen in their region and whose websites haven't been progressed beyond the most embryonic form in months. Random examples include New Garden Friends School, Hugh M Cummings High School or Cape Fear Academy. Had you chosen to add the sort of tag applied to North Carolina's Charlotte Christian School I would have understood; but to jump on an article which is so obviously a new article and a work in progress with reasonably heavy-handed tags such as those applied seems a little over-zealous. I would ask you to kindly reconsider. I have, by the way, based my structure on that of my own city's Presbyterian Ladies' College, Perth -- Ishel99 (talk) 16:27, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Re: The Crystal Caravan question
I play in the band. All facts here are taken from third part sources such as magazines, AllMusic and news papers. Are there more sources and footnotes you need?