Jump to content

Clemson–South Carolina football brawl: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jober14 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
→‎The consequences: despite what some believe, USC is not "reserved" for exclusive use by So Cal
Line 59: Line 59:
The ACC's policy on players serving suspensions permitted Clemson to punish the players during the season, and not an immediate penalty during the Tigers' first game of 2005, against [[Texas A&M Aggies football|Texas A&M]]. Some of the offending players were involved in the crucial game, which resulted in a Tigers win in the final seconds of the game. The penalties were served, based on a case-by-case basis, in midseason games against the winless [[Temple Owls football|Temple]] and one game winner [[Duke Blue Devils|Duke]].
The ACC's policy on players serving suspensions permitted Clemson to punish the players during the season, and not an immediate penalty during the Tigers' first game of 2005, against [[Texas A&M Aggies football|Texas A&M]]. Some of the offending players were involved in the crucial game, which resulted in a Tigers win in the final seconds of the game. The penalties were served, based on a case-by-case basis, in midseason games against the winless [[Temple Owls football|Temple]] and one game winner [[Duke Blue Devils|Duke]].


The SEC's policy forced South Carolina to punish its players for the Central Florida game, the first game of the ensuing season.
The SEC's policy forced USC to punish its players for the Central Florida game, the first game of the ensuing season.


Some believe if the schools had allowed postseason play, the penalties would have been stiffer with more justice, as the seniors involved in the brawl would have faced suspensions like the non-seniors, at postseason games likely against [[Minnesota Golden Gophers football|Minnesota]] (South Carolina) and [[Boston College Eagles|Boston College]] (Clemson). Furthermore, the games during which the players would have served their suspensions would have been against higher caliber opponents.
Some believe if the schools had allowed postseason play, the penalties would have been stiffer with more justice, as the seniors involved in the brawl would have faced suspensions like the non-seniors, at postseason games likely against [[Minnesota Golden Gophers football|Minnesota]] (USC) and [[Boston College Eagles|Boston College]] (Clemson). Furthermore, the games during which the players would have served their suspensions would have been against higher caliber opponents.


==External links==
==External links==

Revision as of 13:43, 31 August 2009

The South Carolina-Clemson brawl was an on-field altercation during an NCAA game between football players from the University of South Carolina and Clemson University. The incident took place on November 20, 2004 at the Memorial Stadium in Clemson, South Carolina. This disturbance led to serious repercussions handed down for those involved from the SEC (South Carolina's conference) and the ACC (Clemson's conference).

The disturbance

Prior to the contest, a few South Carolina players congregated at the bottom of "the Hill" at Memorial Stadium. As the Clemson team ran down the hill into the stadium some of the Gamecocks taunted them and some shoving occurred.

Later, a massive fight resulted during the after two Clemson players hit a South Carolina wide receiver on the helmet after an incomplete pass with 5:56 left to go in the fourth quarter [2][3]. Some players on the field from both teams engaged in shoving and punching and both benches practically cleared as chaos erupted on the field. State Troopers, as well as other local law enforcement officers, entered the field to restore order. No fans ever entered the field. Play was suspended for six minutes.

The fight overshadowed the last game Lou Holtz participated in as Carolina's head coach, as he retired at the end of the season. Holtz quoted that he "is going to be remembered along with [former Ohio State coach] Woody Hayes for having a fight at the Clemson game". Holtz then handed the coaching reins to Steve Spurrier. Clemson won the game 29-7.

The following year (2005), in a showing of sportsmanship which was coordinated by both schools' athletic departments and administrations, both teams met at midfield at Williams-Brice Stadium at the University of South Carolina and shook hands.

The consequences

The ACC and SEC reviewed the tapes of both incidents before handing out proper punishments to players. However, both schools imposed a punishment of their own on November 22, by saying that neither team would be permitted to play in a bowl game because of the brawl.

Both the SEC and ACC suspended players from each school, with the SEC's penalties effective for South Carolina's first game of the 2005-06 season, against Central Florida, while the ACC allowed Clemson to stagger the suspensions for their offending players at various games during the 2005-06 season.

The ACC's policy on players serving suspensions permitted Clemson to punish the players during the season, and not an immediate penalty during the Tigers' first game of 2005, against Texas A&M. Some of the offending players were involved in the crucial game, which resulted in a Tigers win in the final seconds of the game. The penalties were served, based on a case-by-case basis, in midseason games against the winless Temple and one game winner Duke.

The SEC's policy forced USC to punish its players for the Central Florida game, the first game of the ensuing season.

Some believe if the schools had allowed postseason play, the penalties would have been stiffer with more justice, as the seniors involved in the brawl would have faced suspensions like the non-seniors, at postseason games likely against Minnesota (USC) and Boston College (Clemson). Furthermore, the games during which the players would have served their suspensions would have been against higher caliber opponents.

External links

References

  1. ^ "Box Score".
  2. ^ http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=1929371 ESPN - Both teams were bowl eligible - College Football]
  3. ^ Clemson, South Carolina Reflect On Past Brawl :: Two teams had plenty of time off between games after ugly brawl

See also