Jump to content

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 116: Line 116:
Example: [[Charles, Prince of Wales]]
Example: [[Charles, Prince of Wales]]


However, try to avoid ''punctuation marks'' in article names as much as possible. It appears best to see page names as a "navigation utility" exclusively, not as a "tag" with which to pass on subliminal or other messages regarding the person who's name is on top of a page: punctuation marks are usually not of great help in navigation. This kind of qualifiers and descriptions is more suitable in the body of the article where it's easier to treat them in a [[NPOV]] way, and can be supported by a host of other techniques, for example [[Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and series boxes|Categories, lists, and series boxes]].
However, try to avoid ''punctuation marks'' in article names as much as possible. It appears best to see page names as a "navigation utility" exclusively, not as a "tag" with which to pass on subliminal or other messages regarding the person who's name is on top of a page: punctuation marks are usually not of great help in navigation. This kind of qualifiers and descriptions is more suitable in the body of the article where it's easier to treat them in a [[NPOV]] way, and can be supported by a host of other techniques, for example [[Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and series boxes|Categories, lists, and series boxes]]. Styles, like for instance "[[HRH]]", are ''not'' used in page titles of articles on people.


Qualifiers like ''Saint'' are only used as the first word for a page name if this epithet in itself is the most effective disambiguator. So there is:
Qualifiers like ''Saint'' are only used as the first word for a page name if this epithet in itself is the most effective disambiguator. So there is:
Line 126: Line 126:
*[[Louis IX of France]]: the regnal name disambiguates better than the "Saint" epithet (see [[Saint Louis]] disambiguation page).
*[[Louis IX of France]]: the regnal name disambiguates better than the "Saint" epithet (see [[Saint Louis]] disambiguation page).


Similarly, "King", "Queen", "Blessed", "Mother", "Father", "Doctor", "Dr." or any other type of qualifier is generally avoided as first word for a page name of a page on a single person, unless for ''disambiguation'' or ''redirect'' purposes. For example [[John Forrest (friar)]] is preferred as the name of the page where the content is, above [[Blessed John Forrest]], which is a ''redirect'' page. This is rather a practical than a principal rule, so the general principle of "the unambiguous name a person is best known by" easily takes precedence:
Similarly, "King", "Queen", "Blessed", "Mother", "Father", "Doctor", "Mister", or any other type of qualifier is generally avoided as first word for a page name of a page on a single person, unless for ''disambiguation'' or ''redirect'' purposes. For example [[John Forrest (friar)]] is preferred as the name of the page where the content is, above [[Blessed John Forrest]], which is a ''redirect'' page. This is rather a practical than a principal rule, so the general principle of "the unambiguous name a person is best known by" easily takes precedence:
*[[Mother Teresa]]
*[[Mother Teresa]]
*[[Father Damien]]
*[[Father Damien]]
*etc...
*etc...

''If'' a qualifier is used in the title of a page where the content is, it is never abbreviated (apart from Jr./Sr. as described above), so: "Saint", not "St." nor "St". Also here, for redirect pages there is no problem to use an abbreviated form, example: [[Dr. Livingstone]] is a viable redirect to the [[David Livingstone]] article.


===Qualifier between brackets or parentheses===
===Qualifier between brackets or parentheses===
Line 138: Line 140:
*[[Lucius Cornelius Balbus (maior)]] and [[Lucius Cornelius Balbus (minor)]] - see above: for these two Romans the "the Elder"/"the Younger" epithets are not commonly used.
*[[Lucius Cornelius Balbus (maior)]] and [[Lucius Cornelius Balbus (minor)]] - see above: for these two Romans the "the Elder"/"the Younger" epithets are not commonly used.


Some standardisation of the bracketed disambiguator is possible: "(musician)", "(politician)", etc are all very recognisable. Try to avoid anything capitalised or containing numbers (apart from where more specific guidelines specify particular exceptions to that), and also try to limit to a single, recognisable and highly applicable word regarding the person at hand.
Some standardisation of the bracketed disambiguator is possible: "(musician)", "(politician)", etc are all very recognisable. Try to avoid abbreviations or anything capitalised or containing numbers (apart from where more specific guidelines specify particular exceptions to that), and also try to limit to a single, recognisable and highly applicable word regarding the person at hand.


Sometimes a little extra creativity is needed: for example, "Engelbert Humperdinck (musician)" would still be two persons, so requires a split, like:
Sometimes a little extra creativity is needed: for example, "Engelbert Humperdinck (musician)" would still be two persons, so requires a split, like:

Revision as of 15:50, 16 December 2005

General Wikipedia Naming Conventions start from easy principles: the name of an article should be "the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things". This boils down to the two central ideas in Wikipedia article naming:

  1. the name that is most generally recognisable
  2. the name that is unambiguous with the name of other articles

Several general and specific guidelines further specify that article names preferably:

  1. don't add qualifiers (like "King", "Saint", "Dr.", "(person)", "(ship)", etc), except when this is the simplest and most NPOV way to deal with disambiguation;
  2. are in English;
  3. are not insulting;
  4. etc.

For people, this quite often this leads to an article name in the following format:

<First name> <Last name> (examples: Billy Joel, Margaret Thatcher, etc)

The remainder of this guideline is about what happens in these cases when this format is not obvious, or for one or another reason is not followed.

Scope of this guideline

In general this guideline deals with the naming of articles where a single article is devoted to a single person, although there's a special cases section below that deals with several persons with the same name on the same page and with multiple pages for a single person.

This guideline does not deal with:

The present guideline gives the general principles. In some cases more specific guidelines also apply, for example: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ancient Romans), Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Western nobility), Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Western clergy), Wikipedia:Naming conventions (government departments and ministers), several naming conventions of non-Western cultures, etc... (see list on Wikipedia:Naming conventions)

When it seems difficult to follow the "<First Name> <Last Name>" format

Very often the "<First Name> <Last Name>" format doesn't apply. First of all, the overwhelming majority of all human beings that dwell (and dwelled) the earth don't have a name in that format. Most of these are not problematic, unless from a viewpoint of orthography: these specifics are treated in naming conventions guidelines about these languages, and not further considered in this guideline.

Below, each of the options for choosing something else than the "<First Name> <Last Name>" format are treated in the same way: first some obvious examples are given, followed by tips whether it is advisable to use this alternate type of formatting for disambiguation purposes (that is, in the case this wouldn't be the "most commonly used version" of the name).

Single name

Sometimes, mostly for names of antiquity, a single word is traditional and sufficient to indicate a person unambiguously.

Examples: Aristotle, Livy, Plutarch, Charlemagne...

More recent examples include (Far East, including South East Asia): Sukarno and Suharto (Indonesia); Hirohito (Japan)

Using exclusively a last name, for which the first name is known, as title of a page on a single person is discouraged, even if that name would be unambiguous, and even if that name consists of more than one word. The unambiguous parts of the last name are usually redirects: for example Ludwig van Beethoven is a content page to which Van Beethoven redirects. Beethoven has however ambiguity with Beethoven (film).

Exceptionally the use of a single name without any other qualifier as article title helps in disambiguation, for example Tacitus (the author) is seldom confused with the emperor with the same name; more often it doesn't help, for example Homer, Prince,... all mean more than the name of a single person

Middle names - abbreviations of names

Examples: John F. Kennedy, Gilbert Keith Chesterton, Annie M. G. Schmidt

For abbreviated names (if these are the most used) every abbreviation is followed by a point, and every point is followed by a single space. Punctuation marks are generally discouraged in article names (see below): if the version with the first and middle names written in full is used nearly as often as the version with abbreviated names, prefer the version with these names written in full.

An abbreviation of a first or last name (or omitting punctuation marks and spaces as described above) is only possible if this can be considered as a well established and generally used subject's name or nick name, see section about pen names, nick names and cognomens below.

Adding middle names, or their abbreviations, merely for disambiguation purposes (that is: if this format of the name is not the commonly used one to refer to this person): not advised.

People with two last names - maiden name and/or last name of husband?

Some Western cultures use a "double last name" format, either the last name of the mother is added, or the name of the spouse, examples:

Similarly, depending on time, region and habits or exceptions, women might exchange their last name by birth to that of their husband:

In all these cases: Apply the general rule of the form of the name that is most common for referring to the person in question, so (each with an opposite example of the same region and time):

Disambiguation aid is rarely to be expected from adding or subtracting a second last name artificially, or swapping the orginal last name and that of the spouse: Josep Puig i Cadafalch (architect) and Josep Puig i Boix (politician and renewable energy supporter) both have the mother's last name because it is usual, not for helping wikipedia to disambiguate.

"<First name> of <Location>" format

Occurs most often for monarchs (whose last names are often less remembered). Try to use the most commonly used "Location" for this person's name, and only in the case this format is more often used than the usual "<First name> <Last name>" format.

Example: Jeanne of Flanders and Jeanne of Constantinople both refer to the same person. The first version is slightly more used, so that's the preferred article name.

Note that for conventuals also the format "<First name> of <something else than Location>" exists. If a variant with a <Location> exists, that is the version of the name that is preferred as Wikipedia page name:

  • Teresa of Avila, not "Teresa of Jesus" (translation of "Teresa de Jesús", the way she signed her letters and was known in her convent);
  • John of the Cross, translation of "Juan de la Cruz", no "of <Location>" available.

Disambiguation purposes: for several monarchs and saints this is a great help to disambiguate; in other cases the ambiguity appears to persist, see for example: Elisabeth of Bohemia (disambiguation)

Ordinals

Examples:

Disambiguation: only when naming the ordinal explicitly is the commonest way to refer to the person.

Senior and junior

Senior/junior (or for Latin names: maior/minor; or "the Elder"/"the Younger") is only used when this is the usual way for differentiating a person from another with the same name, for example:

For names of Antiquity "the Elder"/"the Younger" is preferred (with that capitalisation) instead of maior/minor (avoid in any case "major", which is not the English translation of maior).

In the case of senior/junior the most common format, that is, adding ", Sr." or alternatively ", Jr." after the name, is preferred.

Using this as a disambiguation technique is not advised, except for those names where the practice is well established, e.g. Martin Luther King, Sr. disambiguates naturally with Martin Luther King, Jr. (and at the same time with Martin Luther, with Michael King, with Martin Luther King III and with any "King"-monarch)

Nick names, pen names, stage names, cognomens

The most used name to refer to a person is generally the one that Wikipedia will choose as page name, even if this sounds awkward for those seeing the name the first time: Alfred the Great is the name most used in literature to refer to this person. Changing the name to Alfred-not-so-Great-after-all or whatever would be more POV than using the name that is most commonly used. It is best to remember that Wikipedia does not make reality: Wikipedians note down what is the closest to facts they can find, in this case that the name "Alfred the Great" is most often used to refer to a certain person.

However, King Billy can be a redirect, but not the article name for William III of England: there's no reason to use the short name in this case.

If people published under one or more pen names and/or their own name, the best known of these names is chosen.

Further examples:

Better not use this for disambiguation, unless it's the name by which this person is known best. For example, B. G. James the politician and BG James the wrestler need explicit disambiguation (for example by a top of the page disambiguation notice on both pages): "implicit" disambiguation by using one format of the abbreviation for the one, and another abbreviation format for the "B" and "G" initials for the other is not sufficient.

Qualifiers not between brackets

Example: Charles, Prince of Wales

However, try to avoid punctuation marks in article names as much as possible. It appears best to see page names as a "navigation utility" exclusively, not as a "tag" with which to pass on subliminal or other messages regarding the person who's name is on top of a page: punctuation marks are usually not of great help in navigation. This kind of qualifiers and descriptions is more suitable in the body of the article where it's easier to treat them in a NPOV way, and can be supported by a host of other techniques, for example Categories, lists, and series boxes. Styles, like for instance "HRH", are not used in page titles of articles on people.

Qualifiers like Saint are only used as the first word for a page name if this epithet in itself is the most effective disambiguator. So there is:

Similarly, "King", "Queen", "Blessed", "Mother", "Father", "Doctor", "Mister", or any other type of qualifier is generally avoided as first word for a page name of a page on a single person, unless for disambiguation or redirect purposes. For example John Forrest (friar) is preferred as the name of the page where the content is, above Blessed John Forrest, which is a redirect page. This is rather a practical than a principal rule, so the general principle of "the unambiguous name a person is best known by" easily takes precedence:

If a qualifier is used in the title of a page where the content is, it is never abbreviated (apart from Jr./Sr. as described above), so: "Saint", not "St." nor "St". Also here, for redirect pages there is no problem to use an abbreviated form, example: Dr. Livingstone is a viable redirect to the David Livingstone article.

Qualifier between brackets or parentheses

Examples:

Some standardisation of the bracketed disambiguator is possible: "(musician)", "(politician)", etc are all very recognisable. Try to avoid abbreviations or anything capitalised or containing numbers (apart from where more specific guidelines specify particular exceptions to that), and also try to limit to a single, recognisable and highly applicable word regarding the person at hand.

Sometimes a little extra creativity is needed: for example, "Engelbert Humperdinck (musician)" would still be two persons, so requires a split, like:

As for all other articles: try to avoid this type of disambiguation where possible (use disambiguation techniques listed above if these apply more "naturally") - but if no other disambiguation technique comes naturally, this type of disambiguation is the most preferred one.

Special cases

Articles treating several persons with the same name on the same page

"<First name> <Last name>" format

Even if strictly spoken not a "First name" followed by a "Last name", for people that share such name, and are best known by it, it is adised to follow this Rule of thumb: better make it a disambiguation page, and give each of the persons a separate article.

Exceptions at the moment of writing this guideline include:

  • Julia Caesaris, six persons treated on the same page. This might be converted to a disambiguation page over time.
  • Nicci French is the pen name for an author duo — there seems to be no problem in treating both persons on the same page in such case. Similar example: Ellery Queen.

Family name only

Example: Peruzzi, a family as an entity that transcends its individuals (who may have separate entries)

See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (identity) for guidance.

For family names that are used across such identification of a group of related people, do as with articles on separate first names: disambiguation page and/or separate article about the etymology of the name. See for example Katz: although this last name has a Jewish origin, it does not define a particular "subset" of the Jewish community, so the Katz page is rather a disambiguation page than an "identity"-defining page.

First name only

Example: Peter

Best to make it a disambiguation page. If info is added about the etymology of the name that takes more than a short introductory paragraph, better make separate "description" and "disambiguation" pages, for instance: John (name) and John - in this case John (disambiguation) redirects to the last of these pages. Jean only has a disambiguation page, but the introduction of this page links to John (name) for the etymology.

Several articles treating the same person

The essentials of a person's life and significance can generally be summarized in less than 30/32 kb. If additional encyclopedic content seems justified, the Isaac Newton article structure can be followed: split the article on the person in sections: each section giving a summary of another article detailing a specific part of that person's life stage or significance in history. Best to make a link to such other articles in the {{Main|<sub-article name>}} format, immediately under the title of level "==" sections. A similar style with {{Details|<sub-article name>}} templates can be followed, as explained at Wikipedia:Summary style.

See also