Talk:Islamic views on oral sex

Do not merged into Islamic views of oral sex

Do not merge.--Rana Ammar Mazhar (talk) 12:02, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Article is extensively sourced

Article is extensively sourced. Deletion should only take place after discussion at AFD. If some scholars disapprove, then the subject IS controversial, & so seems noteworthy.

Rana Ammar Mazhar 01:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

--61.5.138.29 18:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Keep

very important topic, if one can read Urdu & Arabic text in image. Thanks.

first check about the copyright status of the image, and then include a translation or, if too long, a link to a translation.

WTF?

Also, The existence of concept of oral sex is as old as Hudaibiya Treaty as is cited by the most precious Sahih books. At the time of Hudaibiyah treaty, Abu Bakr said to Urwa bin Masud Thaqafi as given below: Is this supposed to make any sense whatsoever?

Arabs Knows Oral Sex

Ammar 01:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

This shows that the arabs at the time of Prophet were familiar with the idea.

> Sorry but I think this subtitle is a little bit discriminatory... I don't know why we should assume that Arabs didn't know oral sex in the first place, it's not like if occidental people invented all sex practices or anything... that should be rewrited

Irrelevant

Why does it mention North American women and circumcision yet not talk at all about it in Islamic tradition?

This needs to be rewritten.

Work must be done

Have to say, this is a really great article, although it's a bit madcap. Let's work to tame it, format and style-wise. Pablosecca 11:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

This is not a great article. This is one of the worst articles I've read. It needs a complete rewrite to even come close to resembling most articles on Wikipedia. This article doesn't flow and just makes no sense at all to read. Timneu22 17:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

There's plenty of good material here, and lots of referances, the problem is the structure is absolutly awfull, it seriously needs a rewrite and a good structure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.89.173 (talk) 20:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

> Yeah, this article surely needs a lot of work and especially, the terminology should be explained or changed, cause the casual reader won't understand everything. For example: "The Shafie madhabs said that the sperm of the male is pure, but pre-ejaculate, or "mazi liquid", is najasa. The partners in fact might be licking the mazi liquid which is najasa before the ejaculation is completed. Hence it could be understood if this is the case then oral sex is makruh but certainly not haram because there is no evidence to say so." I have NO IDEA what this is about. What is najasa , makruh and haram? If you dont speak Arabic... you don't get it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.202.107.106 (talk) 21:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Clean-up

It seems that certain sections of this article would be good candidates for clean-up due to poor Wikipedia style. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Kalivoda (talk • contribs) 21:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)