Talk:Ignatius Piazza: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:19, 27 October 2009

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ignatius Piazza redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Scientology Redirect‑class Low‑importance

	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography Redirect‑class

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Importance tag

Nothing in the article is supported by secondary sources. The two notes are just links to websites of projects mentioned in the article. Steve Dufour 16:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fixed. :) --shift6 20:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm impressed. :-) Steve Dufour 03:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for a job well done! --Tilman 16:13, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality?

I added a POV tag in here. There are references to his Front Sight community in glowing terms, and the positive media coverage about its creation. There's a brief mention under a litigation section but without followup, e.g., [1] . The controversy and the subject should be in the same area, not separated throughout the article. Out-of-date descriptions used in the present tense by no one should not occupy several times the space of a legal settlement involving some $8 million, if I'm reading this article correctly. It seems much of the neutrality problem is from word choice and PR material, and the rest is from how facts are structured. Or maybe I'm wrong. --Thatnewguy (talk) 02:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TNG, did you intend to add the POV tag to the talk page or to the actual article? E^robson (T^alk) 15:45, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this article has major POV issues. It also has no mention of Piazza having his assets seized in May of 2009 as according to this news article: http://www.pahrumpvalleytimes.com/2009/May-15-Fri-2009/news/28773367.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.135.238.55 (talk) 15:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Piazza didn't have his assets seized, Front Sight Firearms Training Institute did. See my question/note below. Ashton.Sanders (talk) 05:19, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Include Front Sight?

The law suit against Front Sight is included on this page about Ignatius Piazza, but there is a much more thorough description of it on the Front Sight Firearms Training Institute page. Shouldn't Front Sight details be on the Front Sight Page? It's linked to enough in the article. Ashton.Sanders (talk) 20:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 I agree that this article has major POV issues.  It also has no mention of Piazza having his assets seized in May of 2009 as according to this news article: http://www.pahrumpvalleytimes.com/2009/May-15-Fri-2009/news/28773367.html  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/192.135.238.55|192.135.238.55]] ([[User talk:192.135.238.55|talk]]) 15:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+Piazza didn't have his assets seized, [[Front Sight Firearms Training Institute]] did. See my question/note below. [[User:Ashton.Sanders|Ashton.Sanders]] ([[User talk:Ashton.Sanders|talk]]) 05:19, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 ==Include Front Sight?==