Jump to content

Talk:Typhoon Gay: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Potapych (talk | contribs)
→‎Intensity: new section
→‎Typhoon What?!: new section
Line 37: Line 37:


I pulled this from IBTrACS[http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ibtracs/index.php?name=data-access]. I thought this needs to be fixed as it would be too confusing for readers to say that the 1999 one and Gonu were both stronger than this storm. However, 960 is a great deal higher than 898. These sources aren't New Delhi either, unlike the [[1991 Bangladesh cyclone]] I already changed. [[User:Potapych|Potapych]] ([[User talk:Potapych|talk]]) 15:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
I pulled this from IBTrACS[http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ibtracs/index.php?name=data-access]. I thought this needs to be fixed as it would be too confusing for readers to say that the 1999 one and Gonu were both stronger than this storm. However, 960 is a great deal higher than 898. These sources aren't New Delhi either, unlike the [[1991 Bangladesh cyclone]] I already changed. [[User:Potapych|Potapych]] ([[User talk:Potapych|talk]]) 15:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

== Typhoon What?! ==

This Typhoon has the stupidest name ever.Oh,Have a joke for ya:

Why was The Typhoon named Gay?:

Because it killed "Gay" People!

GET IT?

Revision as of 22:15, 6 December 2009

WikiProject iconIndia Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Template:Hurricane

WikiProject iconThailand Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Class of article

This has enough info to be a B, but I left it as start because I think the organization is inferior and I'm sure there's more info to be found on the India impact. Jdorje 03:06, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, how about now? íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 15:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Now the main problem is lack of information. Hurricanehink (talk) 17:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've dropped this to a stub. The infobox states over 1000 casualties of which 69 were in India and 91 further casualties are identified. I would not a few deaths were in an unknown location, but 85% of Gay's deaths are unaccounted for. Where were they and how come that location is not mentioned in the article at all?--Nilfanion (talk) 20:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually according to the PDF it were only 39 in India. The ones missing were those in Chumphon (458) as well as about 600 fishermen in the Gulf of Thailand. I have added these into the text. andy 20:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the black and white pictures are pretty, and need replacements. Here is a shot of the storm before its Thailand landfall, though the Indian landfall might be a little hard. Hurricanehink 20:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Went back to start class, since over half the deaths are accounted for now, and we have inline references now. Thegreatdr (talk) 00:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Intensity

37073 10/31/1989 M=11 76 SNBR=3988 GAY         XING=0 SSS=3                          
37074 10/31*0000000   0    0*0000000   0    0*0721052   0 1008*0751048   0 1008*
37075 11/01*0731036  24 1007*0761033  24 1006*0771029  26 1006*0791025  28 1005*
37076 11/02*0811023  33 1001*0821020  35  997*0861019  37  995*0891017  43  994*
37077 11/03*0921015  51  990*0981011  60  983*1011008  70  978*1031003  75  975*
37078 11/04*1060998  81  968*1080990  74  978*1120980  61  980*1120976  66  985*
37079 11/05*1140968  72  985*1170959  75  985*1210948  72  990*1240937  69  990*
37080 11/06*1250925  69  990*1300913  72  985*1340901  74  980*1370891  77  975*
37081 11/07*1390881  84  970*1420871  89  965*1450861  93  960*1460850  93  965*
37082 11/08*1460838  93  970*1460826  92  980*1470815  89  985*1480804  87  995*
37083 11/09*1500791  60 1000*1510779  35 1005*1580765  31    0*1660755  22    0*
37084 11/10*1760746  18    0*1810740  13    0*0000000   0    0*0000000   0    0*
37085 HR SRC=jtwc_wp:tokyo:hko  S/N=1989305N07105

I pulled this from IBTrACS[1]. I thought this needs to be fixed as it would be too confusing for readers to say that the 1999 one and Gonu were both stronger than this storm. However, 960 is a great deal higher than 898. These sources aren't New Delhi either, unlike the 1991 Bangladesh cyclone I already changed. Potapych (talk) 15:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon What?!

This Typhoon has the stupidest name ever.Oh,Have a joke for ya:

Why was The Typhoon named Gay?:

Because it killed "Gay" People!

GET IT?