Forced marriage: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:35, 6 December 2009

Forced marriage is a term used to describe a marriage in which one or both of the parties is married without his or her consent or against his or her will. A forced marriage differs from an arranged marriage, in which both parties consent to the assistance of their parents or a third party (such as a matchmaker) in identifying a spouse, although the difference between the two may be indistinct. The practice of forced marriage was very common amongst the upper classes in Europe until the 1900s, and is still practiced in parts of South Asia, East Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. Forced marriages now in Western Europe and North America are generally committed within these migrant communities. In most but not all forced marriages, it is the female (rather than the male) who is the involuntary spouse.

Forced marriages are generally made because of family pride, the wishes of the parents, or social obligation. For example, according to Ruqaiyyah Waris Maqsood, many forced marriages in Britain within the British Pakistani community are aimed at providing British citizenship to a member of the family currently in Pakistan to whom the instigator of the forced marriage feels a sense of duty.^[1]

The United Nations views forced marriage as a form of human rights abuse, since it violates the principle of the freedom and autonomy of individuals. The Roman Catholic Church deems forced marriage grounds for granting an annulment — for a marriage to be valid both parties must give their consent freely. Many Christian denominations consider forcing a person to marry someone a sin.

In response to the problem of forced marriages among immigrants in the UK, the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007 was passed, which enables the victims of forced marriage to apply for court orders for their protection.

Historically, forced marriage was used to require a captive (slave or prisoner of war) to integrate with the host community, and accept his or her fate. One example is the English blacksmith John R. Jewitt, who spent 3 years as a captive of the Nootka people on the Pacific Northwest Coast in 1802-1805. He was ordered to marry, because the council of chiefs thought that a wife and family would reconcile him to staying with his captors for life. Jewitt was given a choice between forced marriage for himself and capital punishment for both him and his "father" (a fellow captive). "Reduced to this sad extremity, with death on the one side, and matrimony on the other, I thought proper to choose what appeared to me the least of the two evils" (p154)^[2]

Shotgun wedding

A shotgun wedding is form of forced marriage that is necessitated to avoid embarrassment, solely due to an unplanned pregnancy. Some religions consider it a moral imperative to marry in such a situation. The phrase is an American colloquialism, though it is also used in other parts of the world.

It is based on a hyperbolic scenario in which the pregnant woman's father, almost by accepted custom, resorts to coercion (such as threatening with a shotgun) to ensure that the man who impregnated her marries her, sometimes even following the man to the altar to prevent his escape. (The use of violent coercion to marry is no longer socially accepted or common in the United States, although many anecdotal stories and folk songs record instances of such intimidation in the 1700s and 1800s.)

Purposes of the wedding include recourse from the male for the act of impregnation and to ensure that the child is raised by both parents. In some cases, as in early American and Middle East cultures, a major objective was the restoring of social honor to the mother. The practice is also a loophole method of preventing the birth of illegitimate children or, if the marriage occurs early enough, to conceal that conception occurred before marriage.

Shotgun weddings have become less common as the stigma associated with out-of-wedlock births has declined and the number of such births has increased; the increasing availability of birth control and abortion has also reduced the perceived need for such measures.

In some cases, a woman who marries while already pregnant is also referred to as a "shotgun bride".

In Japan, the slang term 出来ちゃった結婚 dekichatta kekkon (a marriage necessitated by an unplanned pregnancy) emerged in the late 1990s with a very similar meaning, although the etymology of the term in Japanese does not imply the same threat of physical violence that the English idiom "shotgun marriage" does. The term dekichatta kekkon can be loosely translated as an "oops marriage" or an "it's-already-happened-marriage".^[3]

Compensation Marriage

Compensation marriage, known variously as vanni, swara and sang chatti, is the traditional practice of forced marriage of women and girl children in order to resolve tribal feuds in parts of Pakistan and Afghanistan. Although illegal in Pakistan, it is still widely practiced in Pakistan's North-West Frontier Province.

Compensation marriage is also practiced in Sub-Saharan Africa and some parts of the Middle East.

In Pop Culture and Academia

The British movie East Is East shows the practice of forced marriages: A Pakistani father (married to a British woman) forces his oldest son into marriage and, after the son's escape, tries to do the same to the two next eldest sons.

The Japanese TV series Dekichatta kekkon is a romantic comedy about a couple forced to marry due to the woman's unplanned pregnancy.

Conversely, the American TV series The Office makes reference to shotgun weddings on two different occasions, both of which were coincidentally opening episodes of a season. The first mention came in "Weight Loss" of the fifth season, in which central character Michael Scott asks the audience of his business meeting what the cause is of the most annual American deaths. Dwight Schrute immediately responds that the biggest killer is shotgun weddings, implying to the viewers that he has grossly misinterpreted the meaning of the term.

The second reference came in "Gossip" of the sixth season. Jim and Pam joke about the fact that she has become pregnant out of wedlock and yet her father is not going to be pushing Jim down the aisle with a shotgun. This, of course, implies that they have correctly interpreted the term, which is consistent with the first reference in the show, when Jim informs Dwight that he is wrong without offering the correct connotation at that time.

Aaron Wildavsky once stated that "the shotgun marriage between policy analysis and budgeting should be annulled." ^[4]

References

^ British Council Handout - The forced-arranged marriage abuse
^ A Narrative of the Adventures and Sufferings of John R. Jewitt, only survivor of the crew of the ship Boston, during a captivity of nearly three years among the savages of Nootka Sound: with an account of the manners, mode of living, and religious opinions of the natives.digital full text here
^ Haruna Kashiwase, "Shotgun Weddings a Sign of the Times in Japan," Population Today, July 2002 [1]
^ Wildavsky, Aaron. "Rescuing Policy Analysis from PPBS." Public Administration Review (1969).

External links

European Immigrants Continue to be Forced Into Marriage World Politics Watch 31 January 2007
Forced Marriage, Another Perspective
Interview with Serap Cileli World Politics Watch 1 February 2007
Forced Marriage Among Europe's Immigrants: Hülya Kalkan's Story World Politics Watch 8 February 2007
BBC News story: Forced marriage 'could be banned'
The UK Government's joint Home Office/Foreign & Commonwealth Office Forced Marriage Unit: Forced Marriage Unit
Akhtar Amin (November 13, 2006). "Swara practised with impunity in tribal areas". Daily Times. Retrieved 2008-06-05.
Declan Walsh (June 5 2008). "15 child brides used to settle Pakistan feud". The Guardian. Retrieved 2008-06-05. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
Ashfaq Yusufzai (April 1). "Blood Feuds Trap Girls in 'Compensation Marriages'". Inter Press Service. Retrieved 2008-06-05. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
"Swara---A Bridge over troubled waters". Ethnomedia. Retrieved 2008-06-05.
"Virtual Slavery: The Practice of "Compensation Marriages"". United Nations Population Fund. Retrieved 2008-06-05. (Microsoft Word document)

[1] British Council Handout - The forced-arranged marriage abuse

[2] A Narrative of the Adventures and Sufferings of John R. Jewitt, only survivor of the crew of the ship Boston, during a captivity of nearly three years among the savages of Nootka Sound: with an account of the manners, mode of living, and religious opinions of the natives.digital full text here

[3] Haruna Kashiwase, "Shotgun Weddings a Sign of the Times in Japan," Population Today, July 2002 [1]

[4] Wildavsky, Aaron. "Rescuing Policy Analysis from PPBS." Public Administration Review (1969).

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 A shotgun wedding is form of forced marriage that is necessitated to avoid embarrassment, solely due to an unplanned [[pregnancy]]. Some religions consider it a [[moral imperative]] to marry in such a situation. The phrase is an [[United States|American]] [[colloquialism]], though it is also used in other parts of the world.
-It is based on a [[hyperbole|hyperbolic]] scenario in which the pregnant woman's father, almost by accepted custom, resorts to coercion (such as threatening with a [[shotgun]]) to ensure that the man who impregnated her marries her, sometimes even following the man to the altar to prevent his escape. (The use of violent coercion to marry is no longer socially accepted or common in the U.S., although many anecdotal stories and folk songs record instances of such intimidation in the 1700s and 1800s.)
+It is based on a [[hyperbole|hyperbolic]] scenario in which the pregnant woman's father, almost by accepted custom, resorts to coercion (such as threatening with a [[shotgun]]) to ensure that the man who impregnated her marries her, sometimes even following the man to the altar to prevent his escape. (The use of violent coercion to marry is no longer socially accepted or common in the [[United States]], although many anecdotal stories and folk songs record instances of such intimidation in the 1700s and 1800s.)
 Purposes of the wedding include recourse from the male for the act of impregnation and to ensure that the child is raised by both parents. In some cases, as in early American and [[Middle East]] cultures, a major objective was the restoring of social [[honour|honor]] to the mother. The practice is also a [[loophole]] method of preventing the birth of [[illegitimate children]] or, if the marriage occurs early enough, to conceal that conception occurred before marriage.