User talk:Quiddity: Difference between revisions
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs) →The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010: new section |
Arborsculpture |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Single|Single-page]] · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] · [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 21:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)</div> |
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Single|Single-page]] · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] · [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 21:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)</div> |
||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0023 --> |
<!-- EdwardsBot 0023 --> |
||
==Arborsculpture== |
|||
Thanks for commenting on the "arborsculpture" debate. I agree that [[User:SilkTork]]'s comments at [[Talk:Tree shaping]] make sense as an isolated analysis. I'm not sure if you are aware that [[User:Blackash]] is the Pooktre mentioned in the article and they have stated very plainly that they have a real life agenda not to have a word coined by a professional rival (Reames) applied to their work. Because of this blatant [[WP:COI]] editors should be looking very, very carefully at the views that [[User:Blackash]] is trying to push and why. I've left some specific info at the bottom of the [[Talk:Tree shaping]] that might help editors realize |
|||
arborsculpture is a generic term and the only one in the world who seems hell bent on making it otherwise is Pooktre/Blackash. Peace and respect. --[[Special:Contributions/208.59.93.238|208.59.93.238]] ([[User talk:208.59.93.238|talk]]) 22:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:02, 7 February 2010
and hurry off as if nothing ever happened." - Winston Churchill
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24 |
(est. 2005) |
small bag of holding
- I usually watchlist talkpage threads for a few days, so please reply in original threads.
- If you leave a new message here, I will probably reply here, unless requested otherwise.
Classical composers time-line
I just userfied it to my page per the general concensus. Hope that's ok? I asked Kleinzach to cleanup the redirects. --Jubilee♫clipman 03:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- For sure. We can always move it to a subpage of Talk:List of classical music composers at a later time, or elsewhere, if that becomes useful. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arborsculpture
Thanks for commenting on the "arborsculpture" debate. I agree that User:SilkTork's comments at Talk:Tree shaping make sense as an isolated analysis. I'm not sure if you are aware that User:Blackash is the Pooktre mentioned in the article and they have stated very plainly that they have a real life agenda not to have a word coined by a professional rival (Reames) applied to their work. Because of this blatant WP:COI editors should be looking very, very carefully at the views that User:Blackash is trying to push and why. I've left some specific info at the bottom of the Talk:Tree shaping that might help editors realize arborsculpture is a generic term and the only one in the world who seems hell bent on making it otherwise is Pooktre/Blackash. Peace and respect. --208.59.93.238 (talk) 22:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)