User talk:SkagitRiverQueen: Difference between revisions
→Johnny Behan: response |
|||
Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
== [[Johnny Behan]] == |
== [[Johnny Behan]] == |
||
You have reverted several of my changes, saying that parenthetical statements are discouraged. Please provide a citation from the MoS. All I see is [[wp:MOS#Brackets_and_parentheses|this]], so {{fact}}. Speaking of which, if you see something that needs a citation, put in a {{fact}} tag, don't remove the info. Behan's grave is in fact lost, according to Boyer. Find-a-grave says this also (there is a memorial placque, but not at the gravesite). [http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=6682341]. The article now states he contracted syphilis while in Tombstone, but that is an inference from the "30 years" date on the death certificate, and should be stated as such. These things are rarely accurate, and info here was provided by his son Albert, who would not expected to know exactly when and where his father contracted syphilis. Albert is also off by a year on his father's entrance into Arizona, by comparison with records. Furthermore, Albert possibly got his father's year of birth wrong and his age wrong (they also are off by a year from other records). Lastly, although I cannot give you reference now, the term "arterial sclerosis" did not mean in 1912 what it does today. What it probably meant in 1912 was the Behan was demented, a condition then thought due to "hardening of the arteries." [[User:Sbharris|<font color="blue">S</font>]][[User:Sbharris|<font color="orange">B</font>]][[User:Sbharris|H]][[User:Sbharris|arris]] 02:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC) |
''You have reverted several of my changes, saying that parenthetical statements are discouraged. Please provide a citation from the MoS. All I see is [[wp:MOS#Brackets_and_parentheses|this]], so {{fact}}. Speaking of which, if you see something that needs a citation, put in a {{fact}} tag, don't remove the info. Behan's grave is in fact lost, according to Boyer. Find-a-grave says this also (there is a memorial placque, but not at the gravesite). [http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=6682341]. The article now states he contracted syphilis while in Tombstone, but that is an inference from the "30 years" date on the death certificate, and should be stated as such. These things are rarely accurate, and info here was provided by his son Albert, who would not expected to know exactly when and where his father contracted syphilis. Albert is also off by a year on his father's entrance into Arizona, by comparison with records. Furthermore, Albert possibly got his father's year of birth wrong and his age wrong (they also are off by a year from other records). Lastly, although I cannot give you reference now, the term "arterial sclerosis" did not mean in 1912 what it does today. What it probably meant in 1912 was the Behan was demented, a condition then thought due to "hardening of the arteries." [[User:Sbharris|<font color="blue">S</font>]][[User:Sbharris|<font color="orange">B</font>]][[User:Sbharris|H]][[User:Sbharris|arris]] 02:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)'' |
||
:On the parenthesis: I can't find it right now but I'm pretty sure the avoidance of parenthesis is mentioned somewhere. However, assuming it is, if someone adds information in parenthesis, that alone doesn't make the information any less viable. It's just been styled in a less-than-ideal way, and should be reformatted, rather than reverted, if anything. <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Equazcion|<span style="color:#000080">'''Equazcion'''</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Equazcion|'''<sup>(<span style="color:#007BA7">talk</span>)</sup>''']]</small> 03:00, 13 Feb 2010 (UTC)</font> |
|||
:Please find my point-by-point replies below: |
|||
::''You have reverted several of my changes, saying that parenthetical statements are discouraged. Please provide a citation from the MoS. All I see is [[wp:MOS#Brackets_and_parentheses|this]], so {{fact}}.'' |
|||
:I don't have a citation, just what I have learned through my years here at WP. As a general rule, parentheses *are* discouraged - but I don't think it's a "rule" per se. There are certainly other ways of writing what needs to be included without using parentheses - and I still believe they are to be avoided in WP. Of course, if you really don't agree that parentheses should be avoided, you could always ask a seasoned editor or administrator and get their opinion. |
|||
::''Speaking of which, if you see something that needs a citation, put in a {{fact}} tag, don't remove the info.'' |
|||
:Well...I think it's really personal preference. Some editors are real strict about unreferenced statements being left in an article. I personally prefer putting a {{cn}} in place and will usually do so in order for time to be allowed to get a ref in place. In all honesty, I was probably having a bad day and rather than do what I should have (placing a cite needed tag), I just removed the statement. |
|||
::''Behan's grave is in fact lost, according to Boyer.'' |
|||
:(a) Boyer has a questionable reputation as a historian who isn't exactly known as a reliable source regarding Arizona and Earp history (I know that from having lived in Arizona for quite a while and having spoken with a number of state history experts), and (b) where's this reference from Boyer? Have you included it in the article previously? Or is this all original research? |
|||
::''Find-a-grave says this also (there is a memorial placque, but not at the gravesite). [http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=6682341].'' |
|||
:Find-a-grave isn't considered a reliable source for WP articles. |
|||
::''The article now states he contracted syphilis while in Tombstone, but that is an inference from the "30 years" date on the death certificate'' |
|||
:Yes, it is. Since the only reference found for Behan's syphillis is his online death certificate, that's all we have to go on and refer to. Anything else would be original research. |
|||
::''and should be stated as such.'' |
|||
:I guess. |
|||
::''These things are rarely accurate,'' |
|||
:According to whom? A death certificate is an official record. |
|||
::''and info here was provided by his son Albert, who would not expected to know exactly when and where his father contracted syphilis. Albert is also off by a year on his father's entrance into Arizona, by comparison with records. Furthermore, Albert possibly got his father's year of birth wrong and his age wrong (they also are off by a year from other records).'' |
|||
:And without another reliable reference available, it's all speculation that means nothing in the scheme of editing the article. |
|||
::''Lastly, although I cannot give you reference now, the term "arterial sclerosis" did not mean in 1912 what it does today. What it probably meant in 1912 was the Behan was demented, a condition then thought due to "hardening of the arteries."'' |
|||
:More speculation (and seemingly, original research) that, without another reliable reference, means nothing in the scheme of editing the article. Of course, if you are able to come up with reliable references that meet WPs referencing guidelines, you're welcome to include any (or all) of it. --[[User:SkagitRiverQueen|SkagitRiverQueen]] ([[User talk:SkagitRiverQueen#top|talk]]) 03:10, 13 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:10, 13 February 2010
Current discussion | ||||||||||||
Always remember - first assume good faith... Wikipedia is meant to be a work in progress; there are no deadlines here... and...Jimbo is watching you!
The hows-and-whys of this talk pageBecause this is my own user talk page, I have certain rules and standards as to how I like to maintain it.
Thanks for your understanding - may your Wikipedia edits be correct, well-referenced and relevant and may you have a great Wikipedia day! Barnstar
Userboxes
Mantle décor
Random commentGotta say, I'm impressed by your userboxes -- there are a few in there I wouldn't have expected to see on the same page. :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:49, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
MessageMessaged the user regarding his harassment. I've also reported the incident to be reviewed by other editors. Happy editing! Netalarmtalk 06:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
WashingtonThanks for your post. I wholeheartedly agree that Washington is one of the most beautiful places on earth. There are some pretty nice parts of the East, like the White Mountains in New Hampshire, but they don't compare. I've been to Israel, too, and that's another one of my favorites :). When I was in Washington I took a whale watching trip that specifically went to the places the Orcas like to go. They are amazing animals. I take it that you also like watching birds. I wish I knew more about birds than I do, given that Central Park and other parks in New York are major stops along the bird migration routes and we get some very interesting ones. And BTW, I think you were right about "incensed" and "posited." Take care, AFriedman (talk) 22:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC) Happy Monday! --AFriedman (talk) 18:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC) has extended an olive branch of peace. Route description on WA 20Please read WP:USRD/STDS; a substantial route description is expected in a road article. See California State Route 78 for an example. I do agree that some of the details were unnecessary, and the formatting was a bit off, but it should have been revised, not blindly reverted. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:37, 24 December 2009 (UTC) Merry Christmas!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Thanks for your note and holiday greetings. And BTW, I don't know if you saw the earlier message I posted on my Talk page, but I apologize for offending you. Here is a little "present" for you. --AFriedman (talk) 19:13, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
DinosI don't think he's heard of 3rr or other WP policies before. I put a welcome template on his talk page. We'll see how it goes. Best, Ameriquedialectics 21:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC) To our newest RollbackerI have just granted you rollback rights because I believe you to be trustworthy, and because you have a history of reverting vandalism and have given in the past or are trusted in the future to give appropriate warnings. Please have a read over WP:ROLLBACK and remember that rollback is only for use against obvious vandalism. Please use it that way (it can be taken away by any admin at a moment's notice). You may want to consider adding {{Rollback}} and {{User rollback}} to your userpage. Any questions, please drop me a line. Best of luck and thanks for volunteering! ❄ upstateNYer ❄ 07:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Congratulations!Congrats on becoming a Rollbacker! Here is this.
Thanks, AFriedman! Karel articleGood job so far. Looking forward to working together to improve as we go along. JoyDiamond (talk) 04:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC) ArchivesMy talk page archives are located here[1]. You have reverted several of my changes, saying that parenthetical statements are discouraged. Please provide a citation from the MoS. All I see is this, so [citation needed]. Speaking of which, if you see something that needs a citation, put in a [citation needed] tag, don't remove the info. Behan's grave is in fact lost, according to Boyer. Find-a-grave says this also (there is a memorial placque, but not at the gravesite). [2]. The article now states he contracted syphilis while in Tombstone, but that is an inference from the "30 years" date on the death certificate, and should be stated as such. These things are rarely accurate, and info here was provided by his son Albert, who would not expected to know exactly when and where his father contracted syphilis. Albert is also off by a year on his father's entrance into Arizona, by comparison with records. Furthermore, Albert possibly got his father's year of birth wrong and his age wrong (they also are off by a year from other records). Lastly, although I cannot give you reference now, the term "arterial sclerosis" did not mean in 1912 what it does today. What it probably meant in 1912 was the Behan was demented, a condition then thought due to "hardening of the arteries." SBHarris 02:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
|