User talk:Ragib

Welcome to Ragib's Talk Page
Reply policy: Unless there is a special need, I would reply in your talk page.

Happy Holidays

		Greetings of the Season
		A merry good morning I wish you, My friends both great and small. When the world, for his fare, shall press you, may you n'er go to the wall. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:27, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ragib! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 694 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Habibur Rahman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Kamal Hossain - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Biman Bangladesh Airlines. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Mjroots (talk) 17:56, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Sure, I won't edit the article for the time being. Please check the note I put at ANB. Thanks. --Ragib (talk) 17:56, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

I've fully protected the article for 24h to give you both time to discuss the issue and prevent either of you from being blocked for breaking the 3 revert rule. Concentrate on the issue, not who has the opposing opinion and keep it civil please. Mjroots (talk) 18:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

That's the right approach, thanks for that. Again, I was not going to edit the article anyway, and I think Zaps and I are reaching a way out in the discussion on his talk page. But thanks for your work. --Ragib (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

The article was already indefinitely move protected. I did not alter that. All I did was edit protect it for 24h, a perfectly reasonable action to get both sides in a dispute to talk to each other via the article talk page. Mjroots (talk) 18:14, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I seem to have misread the infinite-move protection to be infinite-edit protection. Sorry about that. Your action is fine and reasonable, thanks for that. Have a nice day. --Ragib (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Help on Continual Edit

Ragib Bhai, I have created a page on Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin. Though I've not completed, the contents of this article is being changed repeatedly by someone. I think, I've given enough references supporting the content. I've undone the changes. But I'm afraid my IP will be blocked/I'll be punished for continual edits/undo's on the same content. What should I do now? I'm confused. Should I leave the article to that person who is changing the content as soon as I add any information? I need help. Thanks. NasrinatWiki (talk) 16:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for the useful links and also for the editing that you have done for Ferdausi Rahman's page. I would like to upload a picture of her, but finding it difficult. I need to thru the tutorial and help pages .. I guess.

Thanks.

Bhabona (talk) 17:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi - Please help needed for clean up

Hi Ragib, Can you please help clean up this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonia_Ahmed Thank you .

--Sonisona 10:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonisona (talk • contribs)

You have removed a complete section here, these were interviews done on all major newspapers around the world, Plus there were quotes mentioned by this person. Can you explain why this has been done, and if so, instead of deleting it... add them in the reference section.

An entire section is deleted, and they were important. --Sonisona 22:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonisona (talk • contribs)

Please refer to WP:NOT. --Ragib (talk) 04:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

I did refer - but those are important news and quotes... where do you think that will come under....? All those were important links to show that the news papers have carried articles about the company and the president as well as the beauty queens...--Sonisona 08:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC) --67.204.3.201 (talk) 08:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, but you added the huge list of links to the point of spamming the page. Once again, please read WP:NOT once again, in particular, the section Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files. Also, it will be a conflict of interest in your part to continue editing the article. Please don't edit the page, rather make your suggestion in the talk page. --Ragib (talk) 08:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Biman Bangladesh Airlines

Hi Ragib,

Could you give me a hand with this article. Having difficulty explain to some of the new editors what FA means.

Thanks. → AA ^(talk) — 13:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

a little more help needed

first of all, i am extremely sorry for my words, i didn't know that you are a moderator and it's your job to clean up unnecessary additions from wiki. Secondly, I thank you for removing the controversial paragraph from the starting section of North South University. But I still have something to say: Keeping the referenced section named "2009 student rape controversy" just because it is referenced and wikipedia allows to add referenced controversy doesn't make any sense. You must be aware that millions of students around the worlds searches for universities in the Wikipedia before they search it in google. Some controversies shouldn't always be praised just because they are referenced. If you are Bangladeshi, then you must be aware that a lot of public universities have such controversial news about them. But can you show me a single university whose wiki page shows those controversies? NSU is a reputed private university of Bangladesh and that's why some people find it as their duty to spread every single controversial news around the world. And about the references, the newagebd's article also writes the same news for Dhaka University. So why don't we post the news in that wiki page too. So, please just think about it!

—Nsuuser 3:15, 27 February 2010 (BD)