Talk:Erasmus Mundus: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:16, 2 March 2010

Europe Unassessed

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Education Unassessed

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Recreated

This article has been RECREATED and watched by the member signed below to emphasize the complete difference between the programme subject of this article and the sister programme presented in the article titled ERASMUS programme. over the next few months this article can be extended and edited and added to it the necessary information and updates. Regards. Mazim82 13:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC) )[reply]

Just remember that this is an encyclopedia, not a recruitment facility. I excised a lot of uneccessary stuff from the original, but it is coming along OK. Just a hint, we don't type words all in caps, as you did within the article, and above with ERASMUS which is a redirect to Desiderius Erasmus anyway. I have removed your actual name from your post here. We only sign with our real name if that is our username. In your case, you sign with Mazim82 as above. Cheers. Moriori 19:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IS IS APPROPRIATE ?

There are 103 EM programs (2004-2008) as evidenced from Ref.1. I think it is inappropriate that there is a section dedicated to two of them in this page. I suggest REMOVING these sections. Also the whole SEE ALSO section refers to Institutions related to these two programs and should be removed. The article should be about the Concept, not about its Instances!

--Ronchet (talk) 14:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yeah maybe those should be put on seperate pages, with more emphasis on the programme and how it works here --Juxi (talk) 07:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree Juxi. It's better to separate before it makes big mess. I think the article should be in convenience and demand. Wikipeida is already working as entrance gate to all information exist on Internet, which can be edited by anyone.Idea of Concept - Instance is clear in programming language. But, on wiki, I assume we can't say which is concept or instance as far as it exist in the real world and in our brain.

Yes its really important to have a separation of the specific masters description from the Erasmus Mundus page.

Euro Aquae

I'm suggesting merging Euro Aquae into this article because it seems that there are not enough third-party sources of Euro Aquae to justify its own article under Wikipedia's notability policies. If the articles are merged, then Euro Aquae can be put into context; if enough material surfaces to justify splitting the article, that can be done as well.

If the number of programmes is a concern, perhaps a page like List of Erasmus Mundus programmes might be a way to consolidate coverage without having tens of stub articles without much potential for expansion. --Gimme danger (talk) 18:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone add IMMIT program to this article? www.immit.eu 61.17.252.110 (talk) 22:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Title

We should standardize the title naming convention, by de-capitalize the "Erasmus" word. --Guybrush1979 (talk) 08:23, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The request to rename this article to Erasmus Mundus has been carried out.

If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag.

ERASMUS Mundus → Erasmus Mundus — Naming convention. Should be "Erasmus Mundus" instead of ERASMUS Mundus. Guybrush1979 (talk) 02:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Also, I followed links on the page and ended up at SOCRATES programme. Should that be moved also?

Revision as of 05:58, 23 February 2010 edit 70.29.210.242 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:16, 2 March 2010 edit undo Zuiver jo (talk \| contribs) 134 edits →Requested move Next edit →
Line 41:		Line 41:

	[[:ERASMUS Mundus]] → [[Erasmus Mundus]] — Naming convention. Should be "Erasmus Mundus" instead of ERASMUS Mundus. [[User:Guybrush1979\|Guybrush1979]] ([[User talk:Guybrush1979\|talk]]) 02:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)		[[:ERASMUS Mundus]] → [[Erasmus Mundus]] — Naming convention. Should be "Erasmus Mundus" instead of ERASMUS Mundus. [[User:Guybrush1979\|Guybrush1979]] ([[User talk:Guybrush1979\|talk]]) 02:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

			*'''Support'''. Also, I followed links on the page and ended up at [[SOCRATES programme]]. Should that be moved also?