Talk:Libertarian Party (United States): Difference between revisions
→Libertarianism vs. Right-Libertarianism: new section |
Estrill5766 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
I realize that in discussions concerning the "left" or "right" label as they apply to the two dominant parties that the attaching of qualifiers or spectrum positions to a party is a contentious issue; I'm not referring to an overall assignment of a spectrum position, just something that indicates this party's more or less minarchist-capitalist and propertarian stance within the broader context of libertarian philosophy. |
I realize that in discussions concerning the "left" or "right" label as they apply to the two dominant parties that the attaching of qualifiers or spectrum positions to a party is a contentious issue; I'm not referring to an overall assignment of a spectrum position, just something that indicates this party's more or less minarchist-capitalist and propertarian stance within the broader context of libertarian philosophy. |
||
I will, of course, wait for feedback before adding anything, and anything I might then add will be reputably sourced. Not a big deal really, just thought I'd bring it up for specificity's sake. --[[User:Apjohns54|Apjohns54]] ([[User talk:Apjohns54|talk]]) 05:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC) |
I will, of course, wait for feedback before adding anything, and anything I might then add will be reputably sourced. Not a big deal really, just thought I'd bring it up for specificity's sake. --[[User:Apjohns54|Apjohns54]] ([[User talk:Apjohns54|talk]]) 05:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
:I would agree that the party is not representative of the whole of libertarian thought. As of now, I would agree that minarchist is the best term for the party. They have been moving more and more towards the libertarian-conservative train of thought lately, especially with the nomination of Bob Barr and the victory of the reform caucus. But I can tell you for a fact that most party members will flip shit if you apply a left or right label. --[[User:Estrill5766|Estrill5766]] ([[User talk:Estrill5766|talk]]) 01:17, 3 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:17, 3 March 2010
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Libertarian Party (United States) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
Libertarian Party (United States) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
United States C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Template:WikiProject Political Parties
Politics C‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Libertarianism C‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Organizations C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Libertarianism vs. Right-Libertarianism
Given the wide variety of currents comprising modern libertarianism, shouldn't some qualifier be added to "Libertarian" in the ideology box? While it might be generally implied that this party advocates a laissez-faire/propertarian form of libertarianism by the mention of classical and economic liberalism further down the list, it nevertheless stood out as a potentially misleading statement to just refer to the general idea of libertarianism when there quite a few strains of libertarianism quite different than the sort advocated by this party (libertarian socialism, social ecology, etc.) I realize that in discussions concerning the "left" or "right" label as they apply to the two dominant parties that the attaching of qualifiers or spectrum positions to a party is a contentious issue; I'm not referring to an overall assignment of a spectrum position, just something that indicates this party's more or less minarchist-capitalist and propertarian stance within the broader context of libertarian philosophy. I will, of course, wait for feedback before adding anything, and anything I might then add will be reputably sourced. Not a big deal really, just thought I'd bring it up for specificity's sake. --Apjohns54 (talk) 05:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- I would agree that the party is not representative of the whole of libertarian thought. As of now, I would agree that minarchist is the best term for the party. They have been moving more and more towards the libertarian-conservative train of thought lately, especially with the nomination of Bob Barr and the victory of the reform caucus. But I can tell you for a fact that most party members will flip shit if you apply a left or right label. --Estrill5766 (talk) 01:17, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Old requests for peer review
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Libertarianism articles
- High-importance Libertarianism articles
- C-Class organization articles
- Low-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles