Talk:Automatic train operation: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Jstcyr - "" |
→Haxor rulez: new section |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Perhaps this should be included (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expo_Express) "The Expo Express was the first fully-automated rapid transit system in North America" ? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jstcyr|Jstcyr]] ([[User talk:Jstcyr|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jstcyr|contribs]]) 04:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Perhaps this should be included (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expo_Express) "The Expo Express was the first fully-automated rapid transit system in North America" ? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jstcyr|Jstcyr]] ([[User talk:Jstcyr|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jstcyr|contribs]]) 04:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Haxor rulez == |
|||
Has there ever been a hacker or cyber-attack incident on completely driverless lines? Underground railway No.4 is going to be total driverless here in Budapest, Hungary and I'm worried about safety. If anyone evil pries open a control box and attaches a laptop, he could theoretically send trains into each other. I think there should be a man and a dog left "in the loop", like on our existing Metro Line 3, not just electronics. The article does not say if anything like hacking has ever happened yet? [[Special:Contributions/91.82.32.254|91.82.32.254]] ([[User talk:91.82.32.254|talk]]) 22:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:18, 11 March 2010
Business Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Trains: in London Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Semi-skilled Driver"?
I'm wondering what this text means: "Most systems elect to maintain a Driver, or at least a Train Operator (who may have the status of a semi-skilled Driver)[.]" I know that driver is the standard UK term, and it's also used in Australia IINM, but most North American systems use "train operator" to mean what "driver" means in the UK. Thus, "a Driver, or at least a Train Operator," sets up a contrast that makes no sense (or else is misleading) to a North American reader. --Tkynerd 00:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Since nobody's commented in three months, I'm changing the text. --Tkynerd 19:28, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Let's merge these two? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.18.83.20 (talk) 13:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
List split?
Should we have a separate List of driverless train file? Tabletop (talk) 11:08, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps this should be included (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expo_Express) "The Expo Express was the first fully-automated rapid transit system in North America" ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jstcyr (talk • contribs) 04:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Haxor rulez
Has there ever been a hacker or cyber-attack incident on completely driverless lines? Underground railway No.4 is going to be total driverless here in Budapest, Hungary and I'm worried about safety. If anyone evil pries open a control box and attaches a laptop, he could theoretically send trains into each other. I think there should be a man and a dog left "in the loop", like on our existing Metro Line 3, not just electronics. The article does not say if anything like hacking has ever happened yet? 91.82.32.254 (talk) 22:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Unknown-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class rail transport articles
- Mid-importance rail transport articles
- Start-Class London Transport articles
- Low-importance London Transport articles
- WikiProject London Transport articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages