User talk:Nanami Kamimura

File:Chinese Division Table.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chinese Division Table.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 08:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Accordion v2.jpg

File:Accordion v2.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Accordion v2.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Accordion v2.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

SPP

Ok, I'll try. I'm not a summary person, just an editor. Thanks anyway for the responsibility. Am I the only one you've given the message to???--Ja 1207 (talk) 10:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

BB Housemates

Hello, Nanami Kamimura. You have new messages at Template talk:Big Brother housemates.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

It should be fixed now. Let me know if there is still a problem. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:34, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

SPP

The problem is that it is the first time in survivor history that the use of the hidden immunity object led to a tiebreaker and in the tiebreaker, two people changed votes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.105.251.54 (talk) 16:14, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

On PBB Chronology of Events

I just got confused with this: How come in the third week of Pinoy Big Brother Teen Edition Plus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinoy_Big_Brother:_Teen_Edition_Plus#Week_3), the last entry says "Jieriel became the first person to be evicted from the house". It has been there ever since, so I got confused on what to follow. Perhaps you can give me a nudge on which is right, to put it, and therefore my first revert was correct, or it's wrong, and therefore this line from Teen Edition Plus should be removed? Thanks. LordBelly06 (talk) 03:38, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Now it's clear :) LordBelly06 (talk) 04:19, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I have a question about Pinoy Big Brother Season 2 Chronology of events. The separate article seemed to have been deleted. Is there any way for the data included there to be included in this article? LordBelly06 (talk) 13:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

I understand. I guess it will be difficult to choose the right events. But maybe we can do what has been done in the 2nd celebrity edition and 2nd teen edition? I don't know who did those, but I guess that format can be followed so that we can put the section up again in the main article. LordBelly06 (talk) 15:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

There has been one article of Big Brother, I think that of the UK version, which actually used a table for the events, which they can choose to hide. I don't know if this will help with making the article more encyclopedic and still retain the chronology portion. I guess your version is pretty much sound and correct, as evidencedy by what you've been doing in the past and current articles of PBB. I suggest that there be a move for it to be added again, if it is not too much to ask? Thank you, by the way, for answering my queries. LordBelly06 (talk) 15:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: Question regarding MythBusters (2009 season)

Re your message: Long time, no see! Glad to see that you are still around. To answer your question, I think you can write it up as Wikipedia doesn't contain spoilers. If it aired somewhere, then it's fair game. You might want to note in the Talk page that the episode aired outside of the U.S. and have a reference available that it already aired because somebody might doubt you and claim you are making stuff up. Better to counter that with citations or a note on the talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Pinoy Big Brother: logo replacement

Hello. I was wondering if it was okay that I replaced the old logo file PBBdoubleUP to PBBdUP. I did this because the old file malfunctioned, and thought it would be alright to start fresh, and upload a new logo. All the original rationale and licensing is there, like in the old file. I hope this is okay. If I missed doing something to the file, or anything I did wrong, feel free to fix anything. Sorry, I'm new to this kind of scenario! --Dude (talk) 23:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

TVRI

Hi. I have requested semi-protection for TVRI because of the IP vandalism. You and I are spending a lot of time reverting it... Regards Davidelit (Talk) 08:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I saw that. But the IP has been blocked for 31 hours... Davidelit (Talk) 11:54, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Survivor Philippines Palau...

Hehehehe. I'm just curious, since you've been the editor of Survivor Philippines articles since it started. What is your stand in this season? How do you feel about everything that happened since start to finish? Kasi, ako, I express myself in other websites, and am happy that my initial bet, won, Amanda. Well, just wanna know. Thanks.--Ja 1207 (talk) 15:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Ah, that's OK. I just thought that since you also watch these things, you also react with what you saw and heard. That's OK.--Ja 1207 (talk) 16:10, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

PBB Double-Up

There has been an edit by a user which he keeps on reverting back. It's about the color of the bar beside the names in the nominatuion history. He keeps on changing it to their original house, even though what we agreed on is that it should reflect the house in which the person was living in before the eviction. Can you please help? Edit: I did not edit it back. I tried talking to that user but he seems to be not listening. Can you please do the final edit? LordBelly06 (talk) 01:33, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your edits. I just don't know how to deal with those situations here in Wikipedia. Now that Survivor Philippines: Palau is over, I hope we get to work more in The PBB Double Up article. LordBelly06 (talk) 01:55, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

I will check about the nominations when I'm home, but so far it looks correct. What do you think of the edits with the Housemates section, specifically, the editing of the table you made? The order has been mixed up, and I don't think it should be done, but it's your call. LordBelly06 (talk) 03:17, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

I have an idea to better suit the nomination table. There was one time when PDA and American Idol song lists were divided into two columns, so as to shorten the article itself. In effect, there are 2 invisible columns. Could this be done instead of the current revision wherein the saved from eviction names are put in two obvious columns? I don't know how to phrase it better, so I hope I was clear. LordBelly06 (talk) 15:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey Nanami. I have done an edit and asked for comments in the talk page. This is about my edit of combining the nomination totals with the nomination table itself. What do you think of it? I would have wanted to completely immitate Big Brother UK's version with the background color of the totals same as that of the housemate's eviction, but with the red font for House B, it seems unlikely to do so. What do you think of it? LordBelly06 (talk) 09:36, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

I have spoken to the admin who deleted my photo and argues my case. It is up to them to put it back or not. When the image is put back up, I will revert your edit. Honestly, I don't get their point of deleting my photo. I made that photo through paint, and spent time looking at one forumers screenshots to be able to make that. LordBelly06 (talk) 11:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Game of the Generals pieces.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Game of the Generals pieces.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Game of the Generals pieces.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Game of the Generals pieces.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Game of the Generals pieces.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Game of the Generals pieces.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Game of the Generals pieces.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 01:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Edit filter help

I'm trying to get something done with the edit filter we discussed in the past. I'm willing to do it myself, though I'm clueless as I haven't done one before. See my post with some mixed responses here. Essentially I figured out a trigger phrase that would activate the edit filter for three of the Digimon articles he targets. I'd hope you could go through the other articles and his edits and find other phrases that could be used to devise a suitable filter for them as well? I'm busy and could use your help, as you brought this to my attention in the first place. See the linked to post to see what phrases I came up for and for what three articles. Use a similar process to discover other key phrases. We can give our findings to the pro's who will hopefully help to devise a suitable filter(s) that will prevent this from happening al together in future. Cheers, NJA (t/c) 20:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Note that I'm aware that more articles are vandalised, but we must take it step by step. I need keyword triggers that would help trigger the filter. Your help in that would be appreciated, but that's really all for now. NJA (t/c) 07:01, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Nanami Kamimura. You have new messages at Ged UK's talk page.
Message added 14:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GedUK  14:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Digimon vandal

List as many IPs as you can that this guy uses. I can see if some range blocks can be performed to get rid of this guy.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 11:30, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Could you sort the list numerically?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 11:39, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Blocking doesn't look possible. If you could gather a bunch of diffs from the pages that he most often hits, maybe an edit filter can be produced to prevent him from even editing the pages he always hits without having to protect the pages.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 12:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, all I can suggest now is presenting some evidence to WP:FILTER. This way, the pages can be monitored for the bad edits and the specific edits that add the false information can be denied from being made like the spam blackfilter does to links.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 12:34, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

• Unsure of how helpful it will be, but I blocked this range for six months. NJA (t/c) 13:25, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: Problem with Bclrocks10

Re your message: Yes, I'm aware of him. Several of us are. What really made me pay more attention was his behavior towards Meaghan. I think he generally means well with the Survivor articles, just doesn't get that what he has been changing isn't correct. Depending upon his behavior over his next few edits, a discussion about him on WP:ANI might be appropriate. Since I edit the same Survivor articles as he does, I don't think I should do any administrative actions against him without consulting others since I could be looked at as "involved". However, if his behavior towards Meaghan doesn't change, then I have no problems taking administrative action on that. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Come on, fine, be aware of me. You can just be that way, i do those edits becuz many ppl do the wrong frickin edits. And the Survivor Guatemala page has been vandilized and that wuz not frickin my edit. So do not block me. (talk) 11:42, 19 March 2010 (EST)