Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gender studies: Difference between revisions
DJ Clayworth (talk | contribs) →sex segregation: new section |
|||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
This article seems to have got way off track. While it says it's about the separation of people along gender lines, someone seems to have added stuff about every form of sex descrimination, making it a (bad) fork of [[sexism]]. Comments and assistance in cleaning it up would be welcome. [[User:DJ Clayworth|DJ Clayworth]] ([[User talk:DJ Clayworth|talk]]) 02:34, 21 March 2010 (UTC) |
This article seems to have got way off track. While it says it's about the separation of people along gender lines, someone seems to have added stuff about every form of sex descrimination, making it a (bad) fork of [[sexism]]. Comments and assistance in cleaning it up would be welcome. [[User:DJ Clayworth|DJ Clayworth]] ([[User talk:DJ Clayworth|talk]]) 02:34, 21 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
:See also related proposal to rename {{Cat|Sex segregation}} to {{Cat|Gender segregation}} at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 March 12#Sex_segregation]]. --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|<span style="color:#996600; cursor: not-allowed;">Brown</span>HairedGirl]] <small>[[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</small> 11:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:05, 21 March 2010
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Gender studies page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
I need the help of an administrator!!I need the help of an administrator on an article involving a women's health issue. A male doctor is deleting the info provided by female doctors. If there is an administrator who can help, please contact me Drzuckerman 02:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Possessive Terminology?I'm not sure how using the terms wife/husband is necessarily possessive. It's noun describing a relationship. If I'm someone's sibling, parent or friend, I am not their property. Why does marriage necessarily indicate ownership? Certainly, the expression "man and wife" does suggest ownership, but "husband and wife" (or "husband and husband" for that matter) does not, does it? - TheMightyQuill 22:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm not as far off the guide as you might think Neitherday, when I said ""styling" or characterizing of a subject tends towards POV because it does not focus on the subject's own notability" I am including "referring to someone as the wife of (or husband of)". In the line: "A is married to B" such a POV or privelaging does not take place - that in my interpretation is the essence of the guideline. Just a BTW the gudielines have been moved to a new department for "countering systemic gender bias"--Cailil 13:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
|
Template:WikiProject Gender Studies Navigation
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none
parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:11, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced living people articles bot
Your project uses User:WolterBot, which occasionally gives your project maintenance-related listings.
User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects provides a list, updated daily, of unreferenced living people articles (BLPs) related to your project.
Here is an example of a project which uses User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects:
There has been a lot of discussion recently about deleting these unreferenced articles, so it is important that these articles are referenced.
The unreferenced living people articles related to your project will be found here: /Unreferenced BLPs.
If you do not want this wikiproject to participate, please add your project name to this list.
Thank you. Okip 08:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
This article seems to have got way off track. While it says it's about the separation of people along gender lines, someone seems to have added stuff about every form of sex descrimination, making it a (bad) fork of sexism. Comments and assistance in cleaning it up would be welcome. DJ Clayworth (talk) 02:34, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- See also related proposal to rename Category:Sex segregation to Category:Gender segregation at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 March 12#Sex_segregation. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)