User talk:Wyklety

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome Wyklety! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 23:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Bialystok

I noticed in editing this article that you added an excellent paragraph to the article about industry in Bialystok, but in that paragraph you referred to the 19th century as the "XIX" century. You might not realize that in English, Roman numerals are never used to describe centuries. Centuries are in all instances given either in words or in Arabic numerals (e.g. "the ninth century" or "the 9th century", never "the IX century"). Knowledge of Roman numerals is so poor in the English-speaking world that some readers may not even be able to figure out what century you're referring to, since the only places we see them are on clocks and on old inscriptions on buildings (and once in a while in a copyright notice in an old book).

Anyway, I liked your additions to Bialystok but thought you'd appreciate the information. Cheers! --NellieBly (talk) 02:08, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Jan Dzierzon

Imie i nazwisko Dzierzona zostalo zmieniona na Johann Dzierzon, to jest pisownia niemiecka. Britanica podaje Jan Dzierżoń (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/175400/Jan-Dzierzon) i tak powinno byc. Rowniez tu (http://bees.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=bees;idno=5017629) angielskie tlumaczenie pracy Dzierzona podaje Dzierżon, Jan. Czy skontaktowales sie z museum w Kluczborku, albo przeczytales dowody i fotokopie w podanych pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka? Pomijanie zrodel polskich jest niedopuszczalne. Ci ktorzy chca zmieniac artykul powinni uznac wage zrodel polskich wage a nie lawirowac na drugorzednych przekladach i niepelnych zrodlach. Podane tez sa wspolczesne artykuly w prasie polskiej i napisane przez Polakow. Trzeba je wniesc do tekstu. Niech chociaz bedzie widoczne ze spoleczenstwo polskie ma silne zdanie na ten temat. Podaje Ci e-mail jezeli chcesz powaznie pracowac bez udzialu szpiegow: erudra@hotmail.com. --Soujdspo (talk) 22:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

---

Bierz zawsze pod uwage ze: 1) w okresie Bismarck'a zniemczano imiona celowo 2) Poszukiwania liczbowe zapisu imion na internecie sa falszywka - autorzy wtedy i dzisiaj powtarzaja to co zostalo zniemczone i wprowadzone w pismie, clowo, przez nieuwage lub niewiedze. Jedyna droga czy jego imie powinno byc pisane Jahann czy Jan jest stwierdzenie ze Dzierzon uwazal sie za Polaka i kultywowal polskos, i tak jest zgodnie z dokumentami opisanymi w pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka etc. --Soujdspo (talk) 02:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC) --Soujdspo (talk) 02:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Polsoclogo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Polsoclogo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ╟─TreasuryTag►consulate─╢ 18:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oxford University Polish Society

A tag has been placed on Oxford University Polish Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 18:04, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi Wyklety, I've declined the speedy deletion tag for this article, as your recent edits added a weak assertion of notability (oldest Polish student group in UK). To be absolutely sure that the article won't be deleted through a deletion discussion, you should make sure to include independent, reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the subject. This could mean newspaper or magazine articles or books that discuss the club (beyond just mentioning its existance). Many websites don't qualify as reliable sources because they are self-published. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page. Karanacs (talk) 18:42, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Rationales

Hi Wyklety, I've added rationales to a couple of logos you've uploaded using the {{logo fur}} template. Hope this is ok. PhilKnight (talk) 18:28, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

mCPBA

Hi Wyklety. I just wanted to let you know that though your expansion of the mCPBA article is appreciated, the reaction mechanism image you provided is unclear. The mechanism itself occurs in more than one step, and your image seems to combine all steps into a single image/step, which is unclear and also incorrect. Also, you described the electron density transfers in the image as "curly arrows", which is not what they are meant to be known as. I reverted your edit to the previous version due to these factors (even though you did build the article further, your addition was haphazardly done--at least from a chemist's point of view). If you have the textbook available (that you cited) with a more thorough description of the reaction mechanism, it should be delineated in the article, and you should also refrain from describing electron-density directorial arrows as "curvy" arrows. So to reiterate, your contribution is definitely appreciated, but without further explanation, really doesn't explain anything pertinent to the article. Let me know if you have any questions. Elbreapoly (talk) 07:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Map of EU showing GDP per capita

File:655px-European Union GDP per capita w text.png

655px-European Union GDP per capita w text.png

Maybe it is an optical illusion but to my eye, Sicily is shown as having a higher GDP per capita than the rest of Italy. If so, then surely it is is an error. Since you have been a recenty editor of the image, could you verify and correct if needed, please? --Red King (talk) 13:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC)